redeeman

7 ms·

61.
by redeeman 5mo ago
what kind of thinking process is this? do you for real think any KDE project member has thought "yeah, I want to hurt some of our users". this is not how it works. They have actual real data from real users about how many use wayl
62.
by redeeman 5mo ago
what is arrogant? that some features matter to some users? or that developers that work for free have things that matter to them in trying to develop better code?
63.
by redeeman 5mo ago
a great many people use external displays. besides, even without using that, for the vast vast majority of users, there is no pain, they dont even realized they've switched to wayland, their distributions simply did it. and people ARE
64.
by redeeman 5mo ago
I guess things like HDR support, high bitdepth, per-screen refreshrate/scaling, and all those things are just "no apparant advantage" to you. Thats okay, just understand that it DOES matter to some people. what also matters i
65.
by redeeman 5mo ago
remind me again which country it is that has invaded so many countries in the last few decades that you may not know the answer offhand? was it china? also, fyi, chinese businesses can also speak english
66.
by redeeman 5mo ago
but does EU really? EU has, even without the UK, the second biggest military in the world. Are we seriously saying that this is not enough to defend EU? if not, why not? also, the numbers for ukraine support are not comparable like that, mu
67.
by redeeman 5mo ago
lol, its ridiculous to think this is happening, this is one of the stupidest things trump is saying
68.
by redeeman 5mo ago
bullshit, email exists outside of gmail, and email would continue to exist without it. many would have to get a new account somewhere, but that would be not a problem. there are shitloads of providers that would be quite happy
69.
by redeeman 5mo ago
with lossy compression
70.
by redeeman 5mo ago
or maybe just maybe its time for people to realize that the EU is an enemy of the people, and hold the people pushing for this personally responsible.
71.
by redeeman 5mo ago
way to misrepresent what i said. you can do that from the cheapest secondhand phone. What do you think most of these people have?
72.
by redeeman 5mo ago
and what iphone model do these americans have? I would be very very surprised if there were not adjustments that could be made that would significantly uplift these peoples situation
73.
by redeeman 5mo ago
and anyone that considers this to be the case for sqlite, should probably have their reasoning skills examined. if the unfortunate bus incident happens to sqlite developers, there is exactly ZERO chance that it will not be very well maintai
74.
by redeeman 5mo ago
someone tries to scam, steal, beat you up. they then make efforts to stop doing that, and their trust would rise skyhigh? what does someone have to do to earn that kind of loyalty? would you apply this to anything else?
75.
by redeeman 5mo ago
"i hate how the current system is, i see some other guys have something that doesnt have these issues, what the other system needs to do is make their system exactly like my current, so that I dont need to spend ANY effort myself"
76.
by redeeman 5mo ago
> Microsoft spent literal decades rehabilitating their reputation. TRYING to rehabilitate. only fools fell for it
77.
by redeeman 5mo ago
easy choice. also, thats just BS, remember how SOMEHOW the same was said for playback of music on computers, yet somehow a certain now-dead CEO was able to say "fuck you" and it happened anyway?
78.
by redeeman 5mo ago
i am not entitled, however, you are still punishing real users to catch those that are not your users. even more, your false sense of security here makes it WAY worse, we just saw how someone was able to find a service you didnt catch in al
79.
by redeeman 5mo ago
> Why 0.1% false positives are acceptable: Disposable email signups are low-quality. A false positive means one legitimate user retries with a different address — a minor inconvenience. False negatives (letting disposables through) are t
80.
by redeeman 5mo ago
other countries are also looking at many other things other countries are doing, and somehow doesnt arrive at some kind of semi-census in a very short time of eachother.
81.
by redeeman 5mo ago
i am sure many people support it, but then they suddenly had a breakthrough all over the world at the same time?
82.
by redeeman 6mo ago
are you for real suggesting that this is just countries that just so happen to look at eachother than then all go "wow, gotta get that age verification going" ? its blindly obvious that this is an agenda that SOMEONE is pushing EV
83.
by redeeman 6mo ago
your comment says more about you than it does me. how exactly is this a gendered thing at all? people can make whatever decisions they want, INCLUDING lena when she chose to make this photo public to the entire world, for people to consume.
84.
by redeeman 6mo ago
isnt it just a little bit funny that all this age verification is coming everywhere all at once
85.
by redeeman 6mo ago
> for example IEEE has banned it yeah, so that tells us a lot about the yes-men at IEEE. I wonder what other current-thing they will follow when it suddenly becomes politically convenient.
86.
by redeeman 6mo ago
nothing wrong with using that photo, some people just have to chill out. its like people crying snot over master branches
87.
by redeeman 6mo ago
and yet this is clearly not what has happened. you COULD make any decision hostage, but thats not what anyone does, as such, the veto has a very important purpose, and removing it would be betraying the terms that the union was based on, ju
88.
by redeeman 6mo ago
"one last chance to reform", i dont buy it. these things happen, and will happen again. people have been predicting doom for thousands of years, but this time its truly the last!
89.
by redeeman 6mo ago
haha, a miracle happened, people voted someone out, but its NOT a democracy. why is it so needed to try paint it as not a democracy when it has CLEARLY proven that it is such
90.
by redeeman 6mo ago
> Everyone has veto is literally a system where everyone must think the same, else nothing will happen. thats not true, it just means that everone must not be extremely opposed to something for it to happen.

More ›