redeeman

50 ms·

781.
by redeeman 4y ago
netflix content is pirated the moment it gets released, so them employing DRM changes nothing
782.
by redeeman 4y ago
google kinda has a track record here
783.
by redeeman 4y ago
and in this far-from-reality-now story, im sure many things will be different.
784.
by redeeman 4y ago
well sure, I have been through this myself, but I have exercised some restraint in my dependency chain, and so should everyone else. Dependencies can be wonderful, or they can be liabilities. nevertheless, I stand by my point, sure, you may
785.
by redeeman 4y ago
> but that's basically unescapable. or you destroy the evidence.. sure, the regime may come after you, but they cant get what they want
786.
by redeeman 4y ago
it is a special(well I wish) kind of thinking where EVERYTHING belongs to the government, so the notion that someone gets to keep more of their own produce can only mean subsidy. It is really quite sick when one thinks about it
787.
by redeeman 4y ago
will they also ask the virusses to be nice since this is a shopping venue and not some lowly street? :)
788.
by redeeman 4y ago
and ALL evidence, of which there is plenty, says they WILL abuse it
789.
by redeeman 4y ago
we should probably also not blow this "problem" out of proportion. If you actively maintain your things, you can probably handle swapping a few strings out that are garantueed to give buildtime errors. If you dont maintain your ap
790.
by redeeman 4y ago
i can say with quite some confidence that huge companies in europe do not get the same level of scrutiny from the tax department as some regular joe does. They will come after the little guy with the full force of the state, with their lack
791.
by redeeman 4y ago
> Infinite power from the sky that’s cheaper than fossil fuels but it isnt though, if it was, it would be happening all over, without massive subsidies and strongarming from government.
792.
by redeeman 4y ago
well i hope you like prison food then
793.
by redeeman 4y ago
because king pooh doesnt spent disgusting amounts of efforts talking about how china is a shiny beacon of light for freedom, how "we are NEVER gonna be like THEM", "that doesnt happen here". the west talks big, but in re
794.
by redeeman 4y ago
no, you hurt your general well being by working very late, too little sleep, being stressed etc.
795.
by redeeman 4y ago
but what kind of logic would be employed then? by this line of reasoning, what would happen if a group of hardcore communists decided that merely talking about how free markets for AI research is a good thing is something that they cannot t
796.
by redeeman 4y ago
what does the "zi" from "nazi" stand for? :) perhaps you should look inwards for similarities. also, in what way does trying to make someone not be able to talk freely stop people from holding morally reprehensible views
797.
by redeeman 4y ago
I very strongly think that you do not know what you are talking about. And this is because the regimes around Europe is lying at all times. We are the good guys, we would NEVER abuse, NEVER EVER.
798.
by redeeman 4y ago
> Many European countries have well-designed, robust hate speech bans that have worked well for decades to protect freedom against those who would destroy it. And we know this because we stopped anyone who disagreed with the system from
799.
by redeeman 4y ago
and then a few moments later they might concievably go "oh wait, this was simply unprovoked violence, and I am now going to be taking steps to protect myself and others from this threat to society"
800.
by redeeman 4y ago
now I might be naive, but I would tend to think that if I hated someone, for whatever reason, and he lobbied the biggest organized crime syndicate(government) to restrict my ability to talk about my hatred with anyone else, it might just be
801.
by redeeman 4y ago
[flagged]
802.
by redeeman 4y ago
> but I object to people spreading objectively false information. "But they couldnt have known back then, the facts only came out later".... This sounds good in theory, unfortunately people lie, and one mans objectively false i
803.
by redeeman 4y ago
> but then I figured out that I live in a world where I'm not always welcome by the "majority" and have seen first hand how these things can go sideways. and if they cannot say what they think, they will simply welcome you
804.
by redeeman 4y ago
its developing into mental illness because everyone is just 100% encouraging and indulging the insanity. Do you honestly think this great new world of never calling people out on their BS, for fear of hurting their fee-fees is helping anyon
805.
by redeeman 4y ago
well of course the image is real in so far as it exists, but it is not the persons real face. ANYONE can be photoshopped to look like anything, industrial strength makeup can perform mostly realworld photoshops. It is quite obvious that tho
806.
by redeeman 4y ago
without knowing the specifics, im gonna make a generic guess: she probably begins to realize that what she focused on during those years are not what she now realizes matters more. And she figures its probably not possible to perform a cour
807.
by redeeman 4y ago
> You may as well be telling heroin addicts to "just don't get addicted bro". that makes no sense, it would be more like telling people that are not yet addicted: "dont get addicted bro". and yes, dont fucking ge
808.
by redeeman 4y ago
"now people have to contend with fake things existing" maybe its time people get a grip and realize photoshopped stuff is not real, movies are not real, cartoons are not real. Get a grip and do not attempt to run into the huge bou
809.
by redeeman 4y ago
i gotta say, if chrome stands out to you as a shining beacon of quality, i'd hate to hear about what software you consider bad
810.
by redeeman 4y ago
yeah, it is so useful to further ally with one of the most corrupt countries in the world, that it far outshadows the near total destruction of a small town in the US itself.

More ›