redeeman

46 ms·

691.
by redeeman 3y ago
the khtml to webkit to chromium expansion is NOT in any way defensible in contrast to amount of features. I sincerely hope that it is done due to not caring even the tiniest amount about efficiency, because the alternative is not pleasant t
692.
by redeeman 3y ago
so an incalculable effort was spent making chromium just tolerable, but rest assured, still far far far from any kind of random native application, in both speed and memory usage. simply opening a chromium tab with an empty html page uses m
693.
by redeeman 3y ago
Or how about we implement a FAIR tax system. the entire cost of the US is divided up by the count of its citizens equally. its easy to say "tax this tax that" when its other people getting ripped off. If everyone had to personally
694.
by redeeman 3y ago
> those who downvote, what exactly do you disagree with in the above? they believe that taxing someone else more is gonna allow their spendomania to continue. if only we take a little bit more of someone elses money!!!
695.
by redeeman 3y ago
lol please, as if one side is significantly better than the other. the establishment is exactly the same on both sides, and believe me, they do not work for you. stuff like "one side is refusing that" is just ridiculous partisansh
696.
by redeeman 3y ago
imagine if you needed a free ford account to be able to run any backseat you want in your new car
697.
by redeeman 3y ago
im curious which features you find powerful? as email clients go, it seems to be almost as basic as it comes, with many before it having far far more features. unless you mean the extensions?
698.
by redeeman 3y ago
why?
699.
by redeeman 3y ago
except all the practical usage that a lot of linux users have. using your logic, linux on the desktop doesnt exist, and yet it does. Yes, much fewer use it than windows, but those who use it do still use it
700.
by redeeman 3y ago
and now you may learn from them multiple times a day, not in person, but over the internet
701.
by redeeman 3y ago
your right ends where it takes away others. Forcing taxes on people is not that. I cannot violate others, and anyone who would give themselves the rights to do so, are bandits, oftentimes having formed a gang
702.
by redeeman 3y ago
no gang has ever considered themselves to be doing things that shouldnt be done, whether it be the mafia, government, or HOA. They are all illegitimate
703.
by redeeman 3y ago
I pay taxes because a regime with guns says I have to or they will take me away and put me behind bars. This is a crime against me
704.
by redeeman 3y ago
you do not have to be happy with something to not want to personally be responsibility. and to everyone here who thinks otherwise. there are millions of malnutritioned people, including children, in many parts of the world. And i put fourth
705.
by redeeman 3y ago
to my sibling comment, so what you're saying is, mob rule? this is probably defacto how it is, but it does not make it right. Nobody else has any rights to what I own, and I dont have rights to them. this kind of thinking that the &quo
706.
by redeeman 3y ago
yes, so economies of scale
707.
by redeeman 3y ago
i strongly dislike the US system, but some of the things it does is much better than what so called "civilized countries" do
708.
by redeeman 3y ago
to downvoters: how is it wrong? vote for other candidates. No good candidates? become one. the people as a whole has nobody to blame but themselves, this is how it is in a democracy, you have to take (i know i know, BAD) personal accountabi
709.
by redeeman 3y ago
yes, and what can we infer here? the US is more willing to keep criminals that might harm others locked up, contrasting to europe where the holy goal is to collect >50% of peoples entire existence, regardless of the risk to others. And a
710.
by redeeman 3y ago
many of the americans that yearn so hard for the nordic systems have only seen the brochure, and not seen how it actually is. Even most people living in the nordics dont fully grasp just how bad things are unless they are deeply inside it t
711.
by redeeman 3y ago
> The problem is the elected party spaffing countless hundreds of billions on failed projects that are completely irrelevant to cancer treatment or the NHS. thats a funny way to deflect responsibility from the voter. unless you're s
712.
by redeeman 3y ago
and then one considers pretty much all other countries, the ONLY thing making it different here, is that while the US is happy to kill its citizens, the other countries are even more happy to have their tax slaves that they prefer to impris
713.
by redeeman 3y ago
or how about this? what if I choose to never use motorized vehicles for transport, I never fly, I use only lowpower devices, but I want to use a gas range. Isnt it fair that I get to choose what I spend my emissions on?
714.
by redeeman 3y ago
I propose we begin implementing some responsibility for internet actors. If my car leaks oil on the road, that is my responsibility to fix, yet I did not manufacture the car. I propose that we make owners of shitty devices responsible for t
715.
by redeeman 3y ago
didnt they always require shitty DRM? no thanks, they can keep their shit
716.
by redeeman 3y ago
I dont entirely disagree with the principle, but, at the same time, will you spray water on the ground you walk on?
717.
by redeeman 3y ago
but where does it end? what if I personally take a water sprayer with me and spray the ground ahead of me when walking so as to not hurl dust into the air, can I now demand others do so too? this planet is a shared resource, and a great man
718.
by redeeman 3y ago
i personally find it easy to get along with everyone, so long as they just agree to ONLY do things I personally approve of. Why cant everyone be as progressive as me?
719.
by redeeman 3y ago
got any proof of that, or is it just "redneck combustion engine man bad" ?
720.
by redeeman 4y ago
or check? i follow some content creators, and if they were suddenly wiped from a platform, you can bet i would seek them out. if this does not happen, i dont think you can say they have built an audience, they have merely done some things t

More ›