redeeman

20 ms·

421.
by redeeman 3y ago
honest question, but... your wife is a developer, why didnt she make this?
422.
by redeeman 3y ago
he did so many atrocious things while at microsoft theres enough subject matter to warrant it
423.
by redeeman 3y ago
uhm, they had different permissions granularized, in some ways worse than apple, some ways better. but i was not talking security
424.
by redeeman 3y ago
then you have chosen the wrong platform. Just be grateful that the mighty apple even deems you worthy of having files
425.
by redeeman 3y ago
that may well be, but for me, I choose no hinting, with AA activated, and if a font does not look good, I simply do not use it. IF i specifically REALLY wanted a font that required hinting to look good, I would make a special config for t
426.
by redeeman 3y ago
if its not an actual algorithm, but merely the thought of compressing the raw data (im not saying it is/isnt, I dont know), then its obviously totally ridiculous, and frankly, anyone that would even presume to think one should apply fo
427.
by redeeman 3y ago
i always disliked hinting aswell, but thankfully one can just disable hinting on linux, and then fonts actually look fairly similar to what osx did(~10-15 years ago)
428.
by redeeman 3y ago
funny, I dont recall 25 year olds forbidden from leaving the US during the last how many years and countless wars? I also dont see a general notice in israel to not leave the country. But even if it happens other places, it does not change
429.
by redeeman 3y ago
that might depend on your definition of unacceptable, if it is something that people do not like, but dont take so much offense to as to make illegal, i would say that it is simply discouraged or looked down upon, but not "unacceptable
430.
by redeeman 3y ago
do elaborate on the needs for antibiotics
431.
by redeeman 3y ago
could be done in denmark
432.
by redeeman 3y ago
i think you're misundersatnding what it is that does not work here
433.
by redeeman 3y ago
its already broken, theres ZERO security argument
434.
by redeeman 3y ago
they are not pro linux desktop usage
435.
by redeeman 3y ago
to downvoters: are you suggesting it was illegal for women to wear pants back then? (and no, the paris decree does not count). There were female marketed "trousers" appearing in the 1850s, so it is clearly completely retarded to s
436.
by redeeman 3y ago
WOULD, not "could"
437.
by redeeman 3y ago
just remember, the shotspotter may well make police come.... AFTER you were shot... why the aversion to getting a gun??
438.
by redeeman 3y ago
i like how i get downvoted for pointing out that private jets are somehow all fine and dandy :)
439.
by redeeman 3y ago
> That's because intra-EU flights are also highly subsidized, especially around taxes for fuel. okay, so by not taking money from them, we are... giving them money?
440.
by redeeman 3y ago
and of course also private jet trips of the same nature? oh...
441.
by redeeman 3y ago
this seems like a purposely malicious take on it. GNU people, and the people who develop the gimp, are on a mission to make things they WANT TO MAKE. How do you get the nerve to prescribe them as some form of missionaries that goes around t
442.
by redeeman 3y ago
it will never be having "usability" like photoshop, because what it seems like people mean with that is "a clone of photoshop"
443.
by redeeman 3y ago
and if they know how it is, they probably are able to make it happen by planning for it over the course of a year. honestly, im not sure i would ever wish to hire someone who couldnt make this happen
444.
by redeeman 3y ago
whether law enforcement is more on edge is their problem. Either you are ACTUALLY threatening, or you're not. A joke between friends in a private channel is NOT a threat.
445.
by redeeman 3y ago
> I mean... joking about bomb threats at an airport is not "not doing anything wrong". in a private message to friends? it most definitely is. also what does airports have to do with anything? are you implying its okay to do if
446.
by redeeman 3y ago
such is life for a great deal of people. Now forgive me if I am wrong, but perhaps you are a littttle bit too sheltered from real life? :)
447.
by redeeman 3y ago
I guess thats kinda implied when thinking burglars should be let out faster than 20 years(or at all). Unless there is a way to garantuee no re-offending
448.
by redeeman 3y ago
oh we do agree that assault should be way higher in ranking. That being said, burglary can quickly turn to violence. I just dont see why we should entertain that normal well behaved people should tolerate even a tiny risk from people who cl
449.
by redeeman 3y ago
its not like you just do it by accident?
450.
by redeeman 3y ago
that is not what he suggested

More ›