Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
redeeman
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
42 ms
·
361.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
"want to stick with it".. dont misrepresent
362.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
I think footguns are something thats 100% unexpected. I would argue that a user of a database that sees any kind of reasonable size ought to be very aware of how things work, because to be blunt (to use same language as GP), if you are caug
363.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
well either they know the language to some functional degree, or they dont.
364.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
you seriously think the people of EU will accept policies that makes apple leave? the government will lose. People must have their retarded icrap and facebook, its the sedation the governments need to do all the crap they do. take their fac
365.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
sure it does.. just significantly less than ipads
366.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
flipping build switches that upstream provided is "edited your app" ??
367.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
as others said, core functionality that UPSTREAM THEMSELVES decided not to include in default/recommended build instructions?
368.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
true, but can the average person replace the innertube on a bicycle wheel? :)
369.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
and they wont so long as people buy regardless
370.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
how about a conversion path for regular legacy jpeg? and look at cloudinary, jpeg-xl is superior in quality to avif
371.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
anything is insurable, for the right premium
372.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
words matter. That the state does not steal from it does not make it subsidized, it makes it unplundered (or intact, or possibly other words)
373.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
and while we're at it, maybe punish the ones who granted it? perhaps even make the people who did it, and anyone who knew of it, and didnt try combat it PERSONALLY liable for it?
374.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
without knowing what the test did, quick test in no way conveys the same information. Honestly, did you really need to ask them to do that? please dont be that guy on the team (sorry, meant please dont be "that working set of hands on
375.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
unfortunately your ideals isnt compatible with the ongoing epidemic of oppression olympics. add trigger warnings!!!! (im joking)
376.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
i would bet im way more informed than the majority of americans.. how many americans know who the vice president is? how many can even point to DC on a map?
377.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
its very obvious that you are grossly misrepresenting things. If you have an old law that for whatever reason was there, and a newer one is removed, this is how it works. And to suggest that the republicans decided to roll back to 1864 is s
378.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
and then the real world comes knocking
379.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
did they actually reinstate? isnt it just that newer legislation was made illegal, and it DEFAULTED back to this, where there is proposals by republicans to make legislation that in many ways mirrors most EU countries, but that is unaccepta
380.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
thats what both parties say. Those who make blanket statements like this tends to be partisan hacks filled with extremely low levels of information.
381.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
if you're just halfway serious, perhaps its time to seek some medical help
382.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
funny, thats definitely not what it was called when trump issued executive orders, there we had to endure things like the definition of dictator which tends to include "rules by decree" etc, as proof of him being a dictator :) oh
383.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
most definitely, but of course, that might also include deporting illegal aliens that are significantly skewing the seats each state gets, but yeah. I dont care if its inconvenient for one or the other party, it has to be PROPER
384.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
because nobody wants single subject bills, it would semi make them accountable.. remind me, who in congress is for single subject bills, who is against? (and its very few individuals FOR, so not super hard)
385.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
maybe americans should try do sometyhing about the obvious messing with fair elections.. perhaps it could start by copying the EU system of voter ID and paper ballots
386.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
or anywhere else. the kings protection money must be paid, or else. You might call it fancy words to distract, but it is what it is
387.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
yes, sure, its a democracy, but remember the politicians are scummy salesmen essentially LYING to get elected. Even with the relaxed attitude towards false marketing for products, they would have been shut down LONG ago if they were selling
388.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
and that seems to be kindof a problem? in so far as possible, hardware should attempt to be unbrickable
389.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
its almost as if most men are not crazily sexist pigs, that only cares about scantily clad female characters in video games. Its ALMOST as if there is much much to it than that
390.
▲
by
redeeman
2y ago
no, they are simply malicious.
More ›