redcobra762

7 ms·

31.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Ah yes, this is what I presumed was taking place, I just needed you to say it. Race is absolutely real, in that it is a social construct. Race is not, as you say, a biological concept. There are no sets of genetic traits that mark someone a
32.
by redcobra762 2y ago
They absolutely deny race exists, you just seem to want to equate genetic heritability with race. Which genetic markers constitute a black person? Which constitute a white person? You clearly think such is the case, so I’m curious to unders
33.
by redcobra762 2y ago
The NIH is not a scientific source? The Human Genome Project isn't a scientific source? The journal literally called Science? Duke University? Science Direct? The American Medical Association? The Experimental Physiology Journal? That&
34.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Which race? Black people? Nope, Indian and Arabian people get it too. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4822363/ The "asleep" lie is that "black" means anything genetically. Every trait
35.
by redcobra762 2y ago
> In 2003, Phase 1 of the Human Genome Project (HGP) demonstrated that humans populating the earth today are on average 99.9% identical at the DNA level, there is no genetic basis for race, and there is more genetic variation within a ra
36.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Various studies, thinking, arguments etc. That race isn't biological isn't really up for debate, scientifically. You can believe that scientific consensus is too "woke" or has a systemic bias against the idea or whatever
37.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Right, because "care about" doesn't mean "agree with".
38.
by redcobra762 2y ago
It's not a White America thing to reject race as a biological concept, it's consistent with scientific study.
39.
by redcobra762 2y ago
https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/availability-heuristic You've remembered two examples of this (arguably) happening, so you attempt to draw a conclusion based on the ease with which you came up with those example
40.
by redcobra762 2y ago
And you suppose the Trump administration can be trusted to supply those facts? Because that's the source you're citing, if I understand Kyle Cheney's tweet correctly (I may not!).
41.
by redcobra762 2y ago
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2025/02/04/elon-musk...
42.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Is it? Committing criminal acts maybe, but it’s relatively rare for mere existence, absent any other fact, to be illegal.
43.
by redcobra762 2y ago
You say bad faith, but then you equivocate all "change" like any difference is good, or that Congress ought not be involved in the decisions related to how to spend government money, which is wildly unconstitutional.
44.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Eh, OP isn't stopped from talking politics, Gemini('s owner, Google) is merely exercising its right to avoid talking about politics with OP. That said, the restriction seems too tight, since merely mentioning Obama ought not count
45.
by redcobra762 2y ago
No they cannot, not legally, and certainly not in a timely manner. There are simply no mechanisms in place to do what you're saying, nor does there appear to be any willingness to correct errors, given the desire to cut spending. Mis
46.
by redcobra762 2y ago
The question is fine; once you stop interpreting the words literally, you can clearly infer the question to be about substance rather than numerical identity. > How is this (meaningfully) different from Wikipedia’s own “random article” f
47.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Probably some version of this (with threats instead of drugs): https://xkcd.com/538/
48.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Concern over even a low possibility of a catastrophic event is hardly alarmist. And what if your assumption about printing checks is wrong? I find no basis for that assumption, by the way.
49.
by redcobra762 2y ago
It won't say on the tin what the negative consequences of breaking what's in the tin will be, it's never that simple in my experience. There are substantially better ways to solve this problem, so the fact that those better m
50.
by redcobra762 2y ago
...not when the consequences are "people die of starvation because their EBT didn't go through." Moving fast and breaking things only works when the things you're breaking are low stakes. Grandma not getting her daily pi
51.
by redcobra762 2y ago
TIL, thanks!
52.
by redcobra762 2y ago
It implies neither, as everything that's happened to this submission could be done by users (flagging and vouching are tools available to some users).
53.
by redcobra762 2y ago
I could see a regulatory environment where if a package is personally escorted through commercial flight, it falls under a different set of rules than as a package sent from one place to another. Or not! But I don't think the problem i
54.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Are these laws so inflexible they can’t differentiate between a traveler and a package?
55.
by redcobra762 2y ago
The commenter shared an oddly specific situation where the dots would not print, the knowledge of which implies something I won’t say, but will leave up to you to decipher.
56.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Chinese government being an oppressive regime has nothing to do with the West, it's just the context that comes with news about Chinese companies.
57.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Why do you think anything you've just linked is at all related to this conversation? A system must be perfect to be good? That's an insane bar that is not the actual standard. And if you think a US representative is powerless th
58.
by redcobra762 2y ago
Except you said it was worth caring about! I agree with what you wrote here, but I thought we were talking about this because you had concerns about OpenAI's disrespect for copyright.
59.
by redcobra762 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashida_Tlaib would like a word. She would not be a politician (or even alive) if any of what you claim is true. You claimed that the US government censors people who speak out against Isr
60.
by redcobra762 2y ago
When tools increase a worker's efficiency, it's rare that the job is lost. It's much more common that the demand for that job changes to take advantage of the productivity growth. This is why the concerns from Keynes and Russ

More ›