Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
recursive4
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
61.
▲
by
recursive4
3y ago
Upvote if you actually read the proposal in question.
62.
▲
First NFT Insider-Trading Trial Turns on Art Instead of Stock
(bloomberg.com)
1 points
by
recursive4
3y ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
The Expected Value of Artificial General Intelligence
(willholley.com)
2 points
by
recursive4
3y ago
|
0 comments
64.
▲
by
recursive4
4y ago
Reminds me of https://www.documentjournal.com/2021/01/the-internet-didnt-k...
65.
▲
by
recursive4
4y ago
The author would enjoy Atlas Shrugged lest he move intellectually closer to his purported libertarians.
66.
▲
ElonJet: Violating the Privacy of Celebrities Is Not Free Speech
(willholley.com)
2 points
by
recursive4
4y ago
|
3 comments
67.
▲
Probing Gender Bias in ChatGPT
(willholley.com)
1 points
by
recursive4
4y ago
|
0 comments
68.
▲
by
recursive4
4y ago
A perhaps more interesting (and less controversial) variation on this question is "could blockchain usage catalyze financially sustainable and scalable Open Publishing models".
69.
▲
Ask HN: Non-profit founders, what was your biggest counterintuitive surprise?
2 points
by
recursive4
4y ago
|
1 comments
70.
▲
Tyler Hobbs' new playground for generative art with P5.js
(qql.art)
2 points
by
recursive4
4y ago
|
0 comments
71.
▲
Plural Money, Socially-Provided Goods, and the Principal-Agent Problem
(radicalxchange.org)
1 points
by
recursive4
4y ago
|
0 comments
72.
▲
by
recursive4
4y ago
Some lessons require pain in order to be learned; the difference between investing and speculating is one of them. In parallel, there are communities of builders working on the post-jpeg future. Check out https://partialcommonown
73.
▲
by
recursive4
4y ago
Affording a house in which geographic market?
74.
▲
Klima DAO accumulates $100M of carbon offsets, aims to drive up price
(cointelegraph.com)
2 points
by
recursive4
5y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Good questions. Are they going to lose business because of lower throughput? Ultimately the nature of codifying altruism in the law is that someone must sacrifice for someone else; the sacrificer and as well as the recipient of the sacrific
76.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
I share the objectivist standpoint that, as long as wealth is accrued through fair transactions, having occurred without coercion (including monopoly influence) and because parties provided equitable value to each other, it (and its distr
77.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
This is a straw-man description of the ethics of Pareto efficiency. Even as such, if the second person has nothing the first person desires, what obligation does the first have to share their bread? Why can't the second person make b
78.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
This is my personal opinion. If society decides that a sacrifice should be made in favor of a disabled Uber customer, society should incur that cost and compensate the Uber driver the market rate for their time. Wait fees, in this case, are
79.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Respectfully, I don't think we can say axiomatically that welfare is enhanced in the aggregate by Uber stakeholders ({drivers|employees|shareholders}) sacrificing in favor of the disabled because the Nth degree ethical consequences are
80.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
A few thoughts come to mind: - How should a person with disabilities indicate that they have a disability requiring extra time in a fraud proof manner? - Should all disabilities be treated equally? - Who decides how much time should be gran
81.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Yes; BTC is non-fungible with the majority of your potential trading partners. However, depending on your locality, the same can be said about USD, Renminbi, Euro, et al. You are biased in that you are discounting the shifting Overton Windo
82.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Monopolies assume all forms.
83.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
You’re correct that the insurance policies cover operational risk (again, akin to FDIC) but not default risk.
84.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
There are a few salient points to unpack here: 1. Are these companies breaking the law? 2. Are Nexo and others "tak[ing] advantage of unsuspecting investors"? 3. Does these companies think they're "above the law"? 4
85.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
And GUSD.
86.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Check out multi-sig, which transfigures this point of failure into a cooperation problem.
87.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
For context, I've accepted ~$400k (Eth, USDT, USDC) in payments for physical assets. A few important questions here: - What currencies do your customers hold? – At what price points are you transacting? – What are you selling? – How mu
88.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
Check the bird
89.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
In college I studied both CS and Studio Fine Arts (painting), and subsequently while working in tech (startup SE) showed work – that I had painted "for fun" – in NYC art galleries. From there I became part of the NYC arts communi
90.
▲
by
recursive4
5y ago
This comment is top rated yet misconstrues – in order to advance the author's values – both the argument and the context. Topically, Wenger is a partner at USV (Manhattan) and _The World After Capital_ was published as a Gitbook in or
More ›