Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
re-thc
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
61.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> What are you doing where you're getting Sol on XHigh or Max to run out on the $200 plan? Real work. $200 looks good on the outside until the essence of it, e.g. the models lie. I gave a list of spec to Sol and Sol decided some ite
62.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Not sure about the size part, if Kimi K3 achieves SOTA performance at 2.8T parameters, western models being >2x that size would be insanely bad in regards to efficiency. I bet they’re all within the same order of magnitude and below
63.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> This matches my experience with DeepSeek V4 Pro at Max reasoning, That was ages ago (in LLM release timelines). DeepSeek V4 Flash beats it now and a lot cheaper. > On similar tasks, GLM 5.2 at Max reasoning screwed up maybe 20-30% o
64.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Didn’t deepseek recently announce prices will go up significantly? They also previously said prices will go down significantly once they get a hold of the upcoming Huawei chips (later this year). Prices are going up just because they c
65.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> The problem is that they need actual chips tomorrow. They need it today. Best if it was NOW!
66.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> It remains to be seen who is actually willing to pay for it at the prices required to recoup those insane investments. Everyone. Open models are going to keep prices down. A lot of current models are more than usable. Self-hosting woul
67.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> they can replicate or beat the price with rented GPUs They "can" is the caveat here. Rented GPUs are going up in pricing. I recently got an email that DigitalOcean pricing of GPUs were going up. So 1. They have to get a hold
68.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> In the $150/mo range you can get effectively unlimited usage of GPT 5.6 Sol (Pro plan) Not true. Sol on XHigh or Max runs out even on the $200/mo plan. It's not close to effectively unlimited. Maybe at 2x the current all
69.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
The other commenter said it, quoting "Losing Ive was probably a good thing for Apple." So the parent comment would imply that losing Dean is a good thing for Google, which is way less likely here.
70.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Data centers, TPUs Those 2 are definitely NOT Google's strong points. Maybe by means of marketing. Oracle, Amazon, Microsoft, Equinix and many more are in the data center race. As for TPUs... Broadcom, Mediatek and all the other p
71.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> So far even losing Jobs didn’t hurt Apple as it looks. Who knows? Pure speculation? You can also say if Jobs was still around they could have 10x-ed it even further? Apple car could have been a thing? Apple could have been way ahead an
72.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> It's like Apple losing Ive in a way. Are you sure we should compare it like this? Not sure it implies what you think it does...
73.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> People are having a rough time figuring out that good design and fundamentals no longer align with the business side of things. That's not true and wasn't true in the sense that businesses don't care directly but they ar
74.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> The culture is different That's partly. I'd say the other part is it's an open secret they have "illegal" Nvidia GPUs and other "secrets". There's a common understanding not talk about these thin
75.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
Google Frozen v2 chips hardwires the underlying architecture but leaves the weights to be configurable.
76.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> I wouldn't doubt GPT 4.6 Luna being in the top left quadrant's center on the Cost per Intelligence Index is not concerning for Liang Wenfeng. The leaked interview has him saying it doesn't matter... as much as open sourc
77.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> It seems China is already able to do DUV a lot sooner than others expected. That's the media and in particular US KOLs of all sorts driving the wrong impression of China and other places. China and many other places for example ha
78.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Yes but there is a big, big market for subagents to consume lots of tokens cheaply and condense information up to parent agents. That's again not some "intelligence factor" here. Different agents work for different use c
79.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> When model intelligence reliably hits 90%-95% of current day knowledge worker tasks, they are going to burn those weight to silicon Google is already working on a similar idea but more "flexible".
80.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Luna is an extremely strong model. By benchmarks, which sadly is a poor measure. Yes Luna is a good model under certain circumstances. Whether it is great for general usage is another story. Sonnet is definitely better when prompts are
81.
▲
by
re-thc
2mo ago
> Seeing spikes like this makes me question about where the floor really is. You mean they increased the price and then cut it back and now it is amazing? Luna had a price hike vs mini (its previous replacement). The cut now just puts it
82.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> stating no reasons whatsoever It does under reason for reduction, quoting: At the same time, the market in which we operate has undergone profound change over the last 6 months. > giving reasons why there's no need... Patreon’s
83.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> To Nvidia the biggest threat is a capex cut from big tech Not the biggest. Maybe top 3. The bigger issue right now is data center expansion speed. You have SpaceX turning up random generators and doing whatever to get it over the line
84.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> killed Intel’s GPU efforts It doesn't matter anymore. Nvidia's core product isn't "GPUs" anymore. It's a whole AI rack. AMD also announced their own of the same. CPU, GPU, network, etc is all bundled.
85.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> TSMC is at max capacity and they need to fight Apple and others for allocation... Nvidia has (or almost) eclipsed Apple to be the largest customer and definitely has reserved capacity. > Intel now has SOTA fabs on the newest EUV tec
86.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> For me, not using the best model is a huge opportunity cost since my company can afford I But sometimes not using the "best model" is using the best model. Fable isn't the best at everything. Specialization and optimizat
87.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> The irony is the Chinese are being There's no irony. The problem is these generalizations and labelling that's hurting everyone. It's the wrong way to view China and maybe many other places. Just like the definition of A
88.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> the lack of accompanying pro models with these flash releases either means: Rumors say 4) it didn't perform well, especially in coding so has been delayed
89.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
I would prefer they confirm before closing. It's AI / bot anyway. Instead it's just mass keyword zig = close. The bug can still exist post-port. None of it got "fact-checked". In fact a lot of "feature requests
90.
▲
by
re-thc
3mo ago
> that this made bun worse in any measurable way Issues on GitHub was mass closed claiming zig is no longer relevant without fixing the real issues.
More ›