re-thc

39 ms·

691.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Realistically you'd end up chosing between finding the product from another country, trans-shipping or Realistically you'd end up closing shop. It's not like the tariffs on other countries aren't coming back. > j
692.
by re-thc 2y ago
> If I was shipping stuff to the US from china I would just not until this is resolved Most small businesses don’t have enough stock to last.
693.
by re-thc 2y ago
Everything is AI these days. Does it still need convincing?
694.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Struggling to find a definition, but seemingly zonal just means there's a massive instance per cluster. There are a number of zones in a region. Region usually means city. Zone can mean data center. Rarely just means some sort of
695.
by re-thc 2y ago
> The idea would be that different parts of the supply chain would build factories in the US to avoid tariffs. Right, because the US doesn't have diamonds, vanilla, coffee beans or the many other things it needs? How do you avoid ta
696.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Planning tarrifs 90 days out is really stretching the definition Anything that distracts the president from playing golf is an "emergency".
697.
by re-thc 2y ago
> If that happens How does that help? The steel and auto tariffs are still in place. There are plans on tariffs for other industries. You'll be hit 1 way or another.
698.
by re-thc 2y ago
> How are businesses supposed to plan anything in this environment? Plan on relying less on the US market. Grow customers elsewhere.
699.
by re-thc 2y ago
Might need to update this message? The >10% tariffs have been paused for 90 days. So much for stability.
700.
by re-thc 2y ago
0. TSMC, you're not allowed to sell to certain clients like Huawei because we said so.
701.
by re-thc 2y ago
> But I think China's response is a huge gamble It isn't. Trump got the math wrong. China and the rest of the world has a trade deficit with the US not the other around (if we count properly). Does Trump not understand that US&
702.
by re-thc 2y ago
> So they'll raise them until... infinity? We got to follow the formula. So when US no longer has a trade deficit with China, we'll be back to 10%.
703.
by re-thc 2y ago
That 1 is 104% (so far) not 100%.
704.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Why are you suddenly, when faced with data that doesn't fit your narrative, using that word when it was nowhere to be found in the original discussion? The world is always relative. Otherwise if you want it in absolute terms, the
705.
by re-thc 2y ago
> so where are you getting your data? Is this how we came up with the "magical" tariffs formula? Look at some data, interpret it in a random way and off we go? You don't say that [1] shows the average growth was 6.56% in C
706.
by re-thc 2y ago
> US-related businesses are the only buyers of ASML’s most advanced machines. Only because the US requested it i.e. banned China. And who's US-related again? Oh you mean those that have to pay >30% tariffs? Are you sure they&#x27
707.
by re-thc 2y ago
I read the details before it was removed. I think you have some great ideas that can be turned into cool products. Since you've removed it, interested in discussing "offline"?
708.
by re-thc 2y ago
> China made that choice in the late 1970s and early 1980s and has progressed ever since So you're saying that China has grew out of manufacturing because a lot of it is moving out of China. In the same way the US has also moved out
709.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Sure, yes, the fact that the US now is in a weak position built up over decades is just the reality that has to be faced. It's misinformation to say the US is in a weak position. It's not. It's just gone on to do other t
710.
by re-thc 2y ago
> error in terms of who really holds more cards in the trade battle, specifically with China. This isn't 1v1 though. Maybe there was a time when US vs the rest would work, but now? The problem is this isn't about import /
711.
by re-thc 2y ago
> If you’re talking about those, then yes every job in every industry does that. EVERY job in EVERY industry??? Well apparently the penguins have to pay tariffs. Do you know what industry they are in and how they do interviews?
712.
by re-thc 2y ago
> I'm curious, as a software engineer when was the last time you've seriously worked under pressure? Like, 'do this thing now or you're fired/the company goes under' and so forth? All the time. Depends on wh
713.
by re-thc 2y ago
> Why should it? What problems would they solve? We clearly do have a problem. No 1 learns from past mistakes. We keep reinventing the wheel e.g. the land of NodeJs, Javascript, etc. Even within companies there's no learnings passed
714.
by re-thc 2y ago
It has paid off. The market is tanking. /s
715.
by re-thc 2y ago
Apple has a US problem, not a China problem.
716.
by re-thc 2y ago
The CEO better not retire otherwise there wouldn't be a a new CEO hire either.
717.
by re-thc 2y ago
> is closer to traditional craftsmanship and the progression of apprentice-journeyman-master than the “every hacker for themselves”. Let's fix the real problem then? Why can't tech be like this?
718.
by re-thc 2y ago
> What's the logic behind bringing in a junior at 145k? That the senior is at 202k? What logic do you need?
719.
by re-thc 2y ago
> I am worried about AI because it has reduced the entry barriers. Much easier now to write code or atleast build MVP and get traction. There's always been enough people doing it. What difference does / did AI make? Whether it&
720.
by re-thc 2y ago
> It seems Mullenweg has finally discovered that lawyers don't come cheap. He's just not contributing to "open source" Wordpress.

More ›