re-thc

30 ms·

631.
by re-thc 1y ago
> tl;dr -- containers eliminate Java long term Why can't they co-exist? > has eliminated the argument that would favor the JVM This complaint is taking technology definitions too literally. I doubt new adopters of Java or the JVM
632.
by re-thc 1y ago
> Make it easier to unsubscribe than doing a chargeback. Your competitors who do that will have a lower cost and be able to undercut you and you'll go out of business. How do you know people aren't already doing so? It's n
633.
by re-thc 1y ago
> Customers don't want to {blah blah blah} If this is the way it works and the result are chargebacks it just means things cost more in general (cost of business will be factored in). It's not a good thing.
634.
by re-thc 1y ago
Exactly. It's not like Taiwan is the only place with cables damaged. Australia used to be worse.
635.
by re-thc 1y ago
> That doesn't seem compatible with what he stated more recently: Profitable on inference doesn't mean they aren't losing money on pro plans. What's not compatible? The API requests are likely making more money.
636.
by re-thc 1y ago
> But if investment for AI were to dry up everyone would stop throwing so much money at R&D, and if everyone else isn't investing in new models you don't have to either IF. If you do stagnate for years someone will eventual
637.
by re-thc 1y ago
> they sold ownership at market rate No, they did not. The government paid less than Softbank that also just purchased a stake. Unless forced, Intel could have likely gotten a better deal.
638.
by re-thc 1y ago
> Intel failed because the Taiwan government started tsmc Not true. Intel failed because it failed to deliver its own products on its own timelines. TSMC was behind until Intel failed on its own. No government’s involvement changed thing
639.
by re-thc 1y ago
> This way, they get the full amount, and fast. Intel has >20B in the bank. If they really want to they can wait and sell shares for a better deal like with SoftBank. i.e. not the main point.
640.
by re-thc 1y ago
So if I decide so it’s true? I don’t get where you’re going with your comments?
641.
by re-thc 1y ago
Yes, does it matter if there are more reasons? If you want to do something, 1 is enough. The rest are excuses.
642.
by re-thc 1y ago
> fairly routine practice for business owners to let local politicians invest in their business Let? Like this 1? Where if you don't we threaten to fire the CEO and take over the company otherwise? Are you sure it is let? > local
643.
by re-thc 1y ago
> They are now in a position to argue forever that what's good for Intel is good for the federal government What does that even give you? They can argue all they want. Doesn't mean the government will listen.
644.
by re-thc 1y ago
> We can definitely offer subsidies for manufacturing in the US The very subsidies Intel now has to pay with shares for? How is that a subsidy? Companies now and in the future would be very concerned before taking any US subsidies becaus
645.
by re-thc 1y ago
> They're paying the rest of the CHIPS Act money. Overall, they're putting in over $10B into Intel. So taking a scholarship means you're giving a % of yourself to the school? Was this ever mentioned when Intel signed up? D
646.
by re-thc 1y ago
> One can argue how to interpret "financial assistance" broadly, which is exactly what the administration has done You can? So some years later they can change it again? Where's the trust?
647.
by re-thc 1y ago
> was much more confident and convincing with a functional demo versus a hand-wavy figma + guesstimate. Except it also blurs the lines and sets incorrect expectations. Management often see code being developed quickly (without full under
648.
by re-thc 1y ago
> since Rapidus 2nm process is from IBM Unless it has great yields with 0 issues, there's always things to learn from. It's also possible the IBM process isn't what it seems and there's more to it.
649.
by re-thc 1y ago
But he might be right? They are not seeking funding right now. So maybe tomorrow?
650.
by re-thc 1y ago
> A strategic relationship with Cursor might have been enough to accomplish this, but it wasn’t It’s a huge risk as Cursor can get acquired, just like what this news article is about.
651.
by re-thc 1y ago
xAI isn’t young. The brand, maybe. Not the actual history / timeline. Tesla was working on AI long ago. xAI was just spun out to raise more money / fix the x finance issues.
652.
by re-thc 1y ago
> I wonder if Pear AI is dead or pivoted, their open source repos have not been updated since May. They went pear-shaped.
653.
by re-thc 1y ago
> Re-running `cargo install <crate>` will do that. Or install `cargo-update`, then you can bulk update everything. How many developers have npm installed vs cargo? Many won't even know what cargo is.
654.
by re-thc 1y ago
> In aggregate its roughly the same. That's like saying if you pay tax you already pay for everything since your tax dollars is always involved in some part of it. There's no separate section on Twitter or Facebook with said &q
655.
by re-thc 1y ago
> Because with legislative arrangements like Australias, thats what Facebook and Twitter have become No, in this example users using Facebook and Twitter are indirectly paying for this regardless of if they read the news there.
656.
by re-thc 1y ago
> you need a salesforce That's a cloud subscription away!
657.
by re-thc 1y ago
Depends if he will still increase his wealth.
658.
by re-thc 1y ago
Do we just stop all research and development then? This is what we're doing here. If we go back to the Stone Age there will be no pollution!
659.
by re-thc 1y ago
Interesting idea. I wonder how this would compare to native-imaging Gradle or Maven itself.
660.
by re-thc 2y ago
It’s officially deprecated. See: https://opencollective.com/styled-components/updates/thank-y...

More ›