rdtsc

13 ms·

241.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> Is this true, or you just can’t discover them anymore because everything else competes for your attention? There is an element of that perhaps: from the past we already have a great number of movies. The more time passes the more great
242.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Many times more is about what it comes out to. There are some companies selling laser defense systems but they are many times more than cheap FPV drones with grenades attached.
243.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
About $18 latest price if we go in the evening, and for a the whole family it adds up. Given the HBO subscription is about $20/month for the whole household, you can see the movie has to be really good to be worth it, and most of them
244.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> Jet airplanes for sure are completely safe from small drones. Until they land then, due to their cost, they become a very juicy target to aim for.
245.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
At some point it itself becomes a target. It has to be able to get almost 100% kills, otherwise the enemy can swarm it with cheap drones, destroy the expensive installation, then continue as before.
246.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
At very short distances and with a lot of power, perhaps. Despite what we see in movies laser beams diverge. And then with distance it’s harder to track moving objects precisely to hit the same spot long enough to melt it. At that point mig
247.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> I am feeling the potential ITAR violations straight through my screen And possibly landing on all kinds of watch lists. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the sellers there are just honeypots. A name like “Ultra-long-range Target Recog
248.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> I would in a heartbeat. $400,000,000 is never-work-again-in-your-life money I general, as in some rich weirdo like Mr. Beast made that deal and you can have your $400m fair and square at the end? Ok that’s a different scenario to one m
249.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
There just aren’t as many good new movies. Most movies we watch at home are from decades ago. If we didn’t have streaming maybe we’d go to the movies more often, but it’s hard to say. A few movies we watched are not worth the money. To stay
250.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> ETS is not a process that responds to messages, you have to wrap it in a process and do the messages part yourself. I didn't say it's implemented as a process but works as if it where logically. Most terms (except literals an
251.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> But an escape hatch is still an escape hatch. These mechanisms bypass the process isolation model entirely. They are shared state outside the process model, accessible concurrently by any process, with no mailbox serialization, no mess
252.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Not just I-Ready. This is the majority of educational software. The stupid repetitive animations. I am sure they sold it to some administrators as being "fun", and "kids are going to love it" because, see, there is a cut
253.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
They are just covering all the market segments. This is for people who didn't want to shell out $1000 for a laptop for their kid, or have another one just to browse the web. Or they have an iphone but not a mac laptop, but now they mig
254.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Yup I don’t see any huge downsides here for these companies, and not much incentive to change. The more it happens the more they can point to each other and say “see, it’s not just us”
255.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> Especially since the article gives evidence that things were stored in the holes They explain it as these holes are at the top of the mountain. Why climb the large mountain to store your grain there just to have haul it back down later
256.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Very nice app, btw. Thank for you creating and sharing it. We have the same issue with our family, we want to stop but don't know what's coming and if we should wait for something better or not. So the non-driving person is in cha
257.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
It’s still one exit but sometimes it’s on the left side. That is, you have to get in the left lane and then exit from there.
258.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Yeah I am wondering how this got on the front page. I am glad the author is discovering the meaning of words and the basics of distributed systems. But yeah partition doesn’t mean sharding or performance, or parfait.
259.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
I didn’t ask them. Did you?
260.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
One doesn’t exclude the other. Do AI providers sell and encourage this kind of use, where AI is anthropomorphized, has a name, and you talk to it like you’d talk to a person. Especially if it encourages users to treat AI as an expert?
261.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Poe’s Law applies here. “This is a pretty good parody of vibe coding” I thought, but then I didn’t see example commits like “update heart pacer firmware and push to users”.
262.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Latest Fedora versions can also be regarded as a more modern, faster moving RHEL. Granted it doesn't come with a support agreement or the ability to get one (I just am guessing) so it may not tick all the checkboxes for corporate use.
263.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
I just wanted to say "thank you". I switched to Ghostty over a year ago and it's been working out great. It's now my default terminal. My favorite features are responsiveness and ease of splitting panes.
264.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
I prefer Linux as well just to get the same tools and architecture like you said. But at work everything corporate is configured for mac by default. So running Linux is a battle to having to keep up with VPN and other stuff they have.
265.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
I take it as part of his act on film and in reality. He does it with a straight face and people are happily buying it and love him for it. Heck, I like him, too! One can still enjoy the stories and not everything is scripted but that’s the
266.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> But after hearing about the book there, I was really put off by some of the things he said and concluded that the book would be a hard pass for me. What are some of those things? I am not trying to be snarky, I like Herzog and I am cur
267.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> Or just do the thing that maximizes his leverage, gratifies his ego, and pleases his boss. It doesn't really work that way. Both parties want something from each other. If he is not "overcome by a sudden good faith" judg
268.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> If they're designated a "supply chain risk", then any company that does any business with the military cannot be a customer. That's not how it works, they'll just have to show how they mitigated the "risk&
269.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
Microsoft is probably not going to use Anthropic they went all in on OpenAI. Amazon gov stuff is already mostly separate. And in general it’s not clear what “supply chain” means for an LLM. Does it include code written by that LLM used on g
270.
by rdtsc 7mo ago
> The container boundary is the hard security layer — the agent can’t escape it regardless of configuration I thought containers were never a proper hard security barrier? It’s barrier so better than not having it, if course.

More ›