rdsubhas

35 ms·

361.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Not being apocalyptic and all, but reminds me of this: http://matrix.wikia.com/wiki/Operation_Dark_Storm
362.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
This goes directly against their own versioning policy of abusing cliffs and bringing everyone along: https://reactjs.org/blog/2016/02/19/new-versioning-scheme.ht... Quoting from that page: > Therefor
363.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
beta or tata.
364.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
We tried those flags in the beginning since it was introduced in docker openjdk image[1]. When we dug in further, we find its just not trouble free (i.e. experimental). The default is to use 1/4th of RAM which is entirely inefficient [
365.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Fabric8 has really good base java images[1] with a script that simply sets environment variables with right GC and CPU parameters before launching Java, with nice sane defaults. Heavily encourage anyone running Java in containers to use the
366.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Expected to see TUI (Terminal UI) IDEs here (the likes of DBase/Foxbase/Foxpro/etc). Disappointed, because they were hugely used "programmer interfaces" for a long time and influenced GUIs when they came up. Heck, a
367.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
We have explored GitLab in the past and a lot of our CI/CD is heavily inspired from GitLab. They seem to be consistently taking right decisions at the micro level. Their CI/CD design and execution is way more usable and reliable t
368.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Or React's way of avoiding major version cliffs seems to have grown out of this problem. https://reactjs.org/blog/2016/02/19/new-versioning-scheme.ht... (skip to the major versions and avoiding clif
369.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
It's repeated enough that it's a conscious decision. Google offers good application platform, but locks in the data layer. See AppEngine. Had (and still has) much bigger potential than heroku since the beginning. But where do you
370.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
On the other hand, Their discourse community is very active. ElasticSearch people help out there a lot. They are people in the end, and they can't be everywhere. They are spread thin and they do their best. Open source doesn't mea
371.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
A bit more: * Everyone talks of serverless as FaaS or single-file, but most people are not writing single-file contained applications. They are depending on the ecosystem of the language they are using, which means using npm/maven&#x
372.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
> The other key component of serverless is the pricing scheme: pay for what you use; don’t pay for provisioned capacity. There is another way of looking at it: Pay for a percentage of the traffic, irrespective of how fast your applicatio
373.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Will it be using static whitelist files (and will they be updated separately, or as part of the browser update)? Because the last thing (in addition to non-competitive behavior and a host of other things) is to send all browsing traffic&#x2
374.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
If py3 never happened, then py2 would have also have evolved at an equal pace. Nobody can accurately calculate missed opportunity cost, but "almost there, everyone please use py3 now, its not a problem anymore" after 10 years is a
375.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
I'm neither pro nor con with Kotlin, but let's look at history and parallels. At its peak, Eclipse released Xtend. At that point, Eclipse was the IntelliJ of today, everyone assumed Xtend would be the next Java with full support o
376.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
I'm not sure what you mean by vocal minority's complaints. Golang generics is the second most voted issue on GitHub itself: https://github.com/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+sort%3Areac... (I'm not sure if Git
377.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Most problems with Rails: - Fat models (huge number of hooks, scopes, many methods stuffed inside in the name of "domain-driven design", etc) - Fat controllers (huge number of shared methods, hooks, shared variables and hooks, con
378.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
I believe when you say "simulating multi-node setup and addons" - you're seeing it from an operations perspective. Thing is, those concerns don't need to be repeated for every single application. When a consumer says &qu
379.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
"Care about security" is bad way to phrase it. Of course everyone cares about security, only the levels and requirements differ. Please note that I'm only responding because this fallacy comes up a lot of times, and one needs
380.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
A load balancing comparison article that says nothing about load balancing. Weird.
381.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
when both the delivery (pipelines) and the units going in them (container images with deployment descriptors) are automated, its really easy and straight-forward to plug-in a variety of automated checks (e.g. https://github.com&#
382.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
This is true, except it has a huge underlying requirement: that all deployments are forwards and backwards compatible. i.e. a running service must be able to talk to the older version of itself, and vice versa (and of course the chain of de
383.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Ideally neither. The article says We’re swapping in parts from our experimental browser Servo but servo.org says Servo is a modern high-performance browser engine . That's quite a difference. Would be quite happy with servo being an
384.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
(for some reason my comment got double posted, pls ignore this dupe, other comment is somewhere on top)
385.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Not saying that everything else is bad, but one thing that strikes me is how much they have run out of interesting things now that they had to use fillers[1] like: Tooltips Support for tooltips (small popup windows with descriptive text)
386.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Not saying that everything else is bad, but one thing that strikes me is how much they have run out of interesting things now that they had to use fillers[1] like: Tooltips Support for tooltips (small popup windows with descriptive text)
387.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
While I neither love nor hate Go - I'm really confused about "Go gets tooling right". Is it mostly about the built-in gofmt and compiling to binary? Dependency management is far from right, for example, and so are stuff like
388.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Security without context is ambiguous and vague. To the parent comment - which asks about shipping and paying for "M" processes, docker is a reasonable (if not great) solution as container/namespace/process isolation are
389.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Unless you're using bootstrap components as-in-the-examples in the same context and elements, they work fine. But try using them somewhere, like an input or button in a table cell, or card in a grid, etc - and you'll spend an eter
390.
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Especially when we know we have browsed a site before but forgot the URL and remember only some portions of the title. Firefox address bar is just more productive in simple things like re-opening frequent/historical sites.

More ›