rco8786

9 ms·

91.
by rco8786 9mo ago
This looks interesting, anyone tried it yet?
92.
by rco8786 9mo ago
Is this significantly different that the subagents that are already in CC?
93.
by rco8786 9mo ago
Think of it as Just-In-Time context injection/enhancement
94.
by rco8786 9mo ago
That’s a separate tool though. You don’t want to have to open another terminal to git diff every 30 seconds and then give feedback. Much better UX when it’s inline. My main hooks are desktop notifications when Claude requires input or finis
95.
by rco8786 9mo ago
I had this exact experience. Growing up I had nothing but good memories of reading Dilbert over my breakfast cereal, and then laughing as I got into the workforce and realized how accurate the satire was. And then seeing what "he"
96.
by rco8786 9mo ago
This is cool but like...a docker container running locally works fine too?
97.
by rco8786 9mo ago
So this article itself is literally content chunking. > So you end up with short paragraphs, sometimes with just one or two sentences The average number of sentences per paragraph in the article is... 2.4
98.
by rco8786 9mo ago
Most of it seems fine, although eating even more meat than we already do is a bit perplexing. The new "guidelines" for alcohol are pretty laughable though. I say that as someone who enjoys his fair share of beers. “The implication
99.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Steve Jobs died 14 years ago. If we're attributing this to those in charge, Jony Ive's departure is much more correlated.
100.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Yea. Nobody wants to be a full-time code reviewer.
101.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Yea I'm not attempting to make any broad statements about regulations or who has or hasn't been laid off. Only that a common mistake I see a lot of people making is trying to apply AI/LLMs to tasks that need to be determinist
102.
by rco8786 10mo ago
I generally agree with you, but am trying to see the world through the new AI lens. Having a machine make human errors isn't the end of the world, it just completely changes the class of problems that the machine should be deployed to.
103.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Neither of them integrate annotations into the language. They’re both bolt-ons and it shows, badly. If either of them were good developer experiences one would have caught on. But they’re both way off the beaten path in terms of what engine
104.
by rco8786 10mo ago
So that it doesn’t have to go through the Ruby development process. Matz doesn’t want it, and even if he did it would take years just to get people to agree on a syntax, much less actually get it implemented and rolled out. Same reason Type
105.
by rco8786 10mo ago
I think it will need to be a strong 3rd party that basically gives it the Typescript treatment. Adds type annotations to the core language syntax. The compiler does type checking, strips the annotations, and outputs plain Ruby.
106.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Fairly hardcore rubyist here. Ruby-lsp is excellent. But in no way is RBS becoming standard. Maybe it will, I don’t know. But adoption is very, very low as of today. Rbs-inline is just someone’s pet project and has very little activity (tho
107.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Almost any modern rails apps that have a job queue will use this at some point
108.
by rco8786 10mo ago
So....LLMs can hallucinate GIDs. I hope that everyone is aware of that.
109.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Again, it depends on the business case. Software is simply too fluid to be able to architect any sort of complex system that guarantees an acyclic data flow forever.
110.
by rco8786 10mo ago
I don't mean that. I mean that eventually the business is going to need some feature that requires breaking the acyclic rule.
111.
by rco8786 10mo ago
Is there any way to actually enforce this in reality? Eventually some leaf service is going to need to hit an API on an upstream node or even just 2 leaf nodes that need to talk to each other.
112.
by rco8786 10mo ago
It's literally just as hard to name things descriptively as it is to name them cutely.
113.
Ask HN: Cloudflare WAF Alternatives?
28 points by rco8786 11mo ago|16 comments
114.
by rco8786 11mo ago
React server components initially came out 5ish years ago, for whatever that's worth.
115.
by rco8786 11mo ago
Except bun is OSS, so they could have just forked if something happened
116.
by rco8786 11mo ago
Ruby needs a Typescript. Leave ruby-core as it is. Let us write Ruby with type annotations, where the compiler does type checking, strips the annotations, and leaves us with plain runnable Ruby.
117.
by rco8786 11mo ago
This is super interesting. Is it possible to turn the runtime checks off in certain environments? I would love to have these type checks just happen during unit tests, for example, and then no-op in production so that performance is unimpac
118.
by rco8786 11mo ago
> No, the tech-illiterate gravitate towards the path of least resistance, which just means the platform defaults. The path of least resistance is by way of brand recognition. > OpenAI doesn't control the platform OpenAI has 800
119.
by rco8786 11mo ago
Ok? Because of their brand recognition?
120.
by rco8786 11mo ago
Hard disagree. If anything brand recognition is more important for technically illiterate. > In the same way that every 90s mom called a video game console a "Nintendo" And this proves that point. Nintendo sales in the 1990s

More ›