rco8786

19 ms·

361.
by rco8786 1y ago
One more reason to be confused about nextjs
362.
by rco8786 1y ago
> So, why do you need it from the US? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that most other countries don't allow people to sell their blood for money.
363.
by rco8786 1y ago
Did my comment make him out to be an asshole? That wasn't the intent.
364.
by rco8786 1y ago
It's not obvious to me. I look around and nobody I know is outsourcing anything anymore than they were 5, 10, 20 years ago. Nor is it obvious that outsourced products are inherently shittier than something made domestically. You can&#x
365.
by rco8786 1y ago
Do you have some data to show that outsourcing is the culprit? It seems just as easy to blame "foreigners" as it is to blame "AI", especially considering your blanket followup statement about those foreigners always maki
366.
by rco8786 1y ago
All of those things are true, and none of that is mutually exclusive to price changes affecting (what is left of) the buyer demand.
367.
by rco8786 1y ago
No, Trump himself constantly claimed to know nothing of P2025. But apparently it’s now “was definitely the plan”. How am I supposed to distinguish between that and his rhetoric around 2028? How do we know it’s “flooding the zone” and not s
368.
by rco8786 1y ago
> Does anyone seriously think Jan 6th, bad as it was, was going to end the republic? Literally everyone sat in fear for our republic that day as we watched that happened. What were you doing?
369.
by rco8786 1y ago
That's what everyone told me about project 2025 too. Plus I thought one of trump's things was "no more BS". Is that not a thing anymore?
370.
by rco8786 1y ago
> Not going to change the buying market. Price changes absolutely change the buying market. What a weird thing to say. A lot of people will never buy a Tesla, a lot still will (they delivered 300k+ vehicles in Q1). The ones who still wil
371.
by rco8786 1y ago
If Obama was best buds with Elon and telling the USA to buy Teslas and calling any vandalism against Tesla terrorism and campaigning together and doing Oval Office press conferences together and having Thanksgiving dinner together and letti
372.
by rco8786 1y ago
That's great, I'm all for seeing that number increase. That doesn't take away the fact that this number just explicitly targets Tesla and nobody else.
373.
by rco8786 1y ago
Just a coincidence that the only company that currently fits the criteria is Tesla then. Everyone else can start rearranging their supply chains and building new factories to comply. Easy peasy right? Be up and running in a few weeks, at
374.
by rco8786 1y ago
Nor do I, I'm sure he's aware it's propped up on nothing but fumes and vibes. I was just commenting on OP wishing they had shorted TSLA months ago. Easy to say in hindsight, is all.
375.
by rco8786 1y ago
Kind of a good example of how AI gets it "almost" right.
376.
by rco8786 1y ago
One interesting thing is that he seems completely unaware that he is the problem. Stepping back from DOGE to focus on Tesla again. He thinks that him getting closer to Tesla will help save the brand, when it's exactly his association
377.
by rco8786 1y ago
Can you demonstrate that this misallocation is worse in the US than it is in other countries?
378.
by rco8786 1y ago
Feels kinda like an American kei truck, maybe it'll catch on.
379.
by rco8786 2y ago
Seriously, talk about self fulfilling. "We stopped showing people content from their friends, and people started spending less time viewing content from their friends. It's inexplicable, really."
380.
by rco8786 2y ago
My second example was "Hey gmail, categorize all my incoming email into one of these 3 categories: [X, Y, Z]"
381.
by rco8786 2y ago
This all jives with my personal experience, as a male. I can't help but read this article and think about evolution. Specifically, that men were more likely to work together "side by side" toward a common goal (hunting an ani
382.
by rco8786 2y ago
I think there's a lot of potential in AI as a UX in that way particularly for complex apps. You give the AI context about all the possible options/configurations that your app supports and then let it provide a natural language in
383.
by rco8786 2y ago
This is a similar reaction folks had to autocomplete/intellisense when it came out also. "What you just press tab and get all the possible options. Psh, how about reading the docs like the rest of us did?". I think AI is a pr
384.
by rco8786 2y ago
> import my data by using my computer You're under the mistaken impression that you will own this data. What you are describing is akin to saying you will just export your friends list, posts, messages, pictures, etc from facebook
385.
by rco8786 2y ago
Was there supposed to be? The article isn't technical in nature. It's predicting upcoming business shifts in the AI industry.
386.
by rco8786 2y ago
The article is about exactly that. The moat for AI products will be, as is so often the case, user data. In this case, your personal history of interactions with a given AI. The author predicts a land grab where AI companies try to scoop up
387.
by rco8786 2y ago
They are doing it, but there's no profit incentive. Github is a bit of a special case because of their commitment to OSS and the broader engineering community, but the moment a downturn occurs and MS takes a harder look at P&Ls, yo
388.
by rco8786 2y ago
> why is it the government's job to do this This is like, exactly the sort of thing that the public sector should be doing. There's no profit incentive for this to happen in the private sector. I don't disagree with your o
389.
by rco8786 2y ago
Every system has problems. The challenge is to address the problems and fix them. Not just delete the entire system and claim a win.
390.
by rco8786 2y ago
> perhaps the thinking is to radically change approaches? If there had been a replacement or reform plan for even one single iota of the things this admin has cut, I might give them the benefit of the doubt. But there's not. It&#x27

More ›