Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rcme
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
241.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Maybe dignity is part of it, but the main issue (in the U.S.) is that everything is very spread out and very few places have the requisite density to support walking. I don't care if it's the most dignified experience ever. I'
242.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
What’s the average age of death though?
243.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
That’s pretty much the opposite of memory, as the behavior is completely innate.
244.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
That is crazy, but, on the other hand, seeing this rotate faster than once every two seconds would be insanely fast.
245.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
You could find a US company with an office in the UK that will let you work there for a year before brining you to the US on an L1. You could also apply for an O1 if you’ve published a lot.
246.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
> That's not a matter of rationality anymore; it's faith. There's no evidence either way. If there is no evidence either way, then it is only rational to reject any positive assertion. The reason is that negative assertion
247.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
What’s the alternative? Ultimately, the issue isn’t “a dependency graph of a million tiny packages” but rather running other people’s code. If you read the attack details, this is a targeted campaign where people are being tricked into runn
248.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
I think the main reason mainline SQLs continue to be popular is that, unlike general purpose programming languages, the implementation of the query runner is the most important aspect, not then language spec. Take Python for instance. The o
249.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
> If we're to be exact, we can't prove that if I throw an object upwards with 5 N of force right now, the gravitational field won't suddenly shift (for some reason) and send it out of the atmosphere. Ok then let’s rephrase
250.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
So your argument is that science can’t prove anything because it can’t prove everything? Also you said science can’t prove or disprove , but it seems trivially easy to construct many things science could disprove. E.g. you could disprove t
251.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
> but science can't prove or disprove anything, ultimately. What? From where do we derive our knowledge of the natural world and universe? How do we know, for instance, that the Earth revolves around the sun and not vice versa? Are
252.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
That’s different. That involves a house, and the word house appears in the 4th amendment.
253.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Yes, “X is true because it feels good to believe so” is not a rational basis for belief. Most people act rationally and irrationally. So you can hold an irrational belief, i.e. that your religion is the One True Religion, and then take rati
254.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
How comprehensive was your search? https://twitter.com/rothschildmd/status/1683289016723202050
255.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
How is this not bigger news? He actually proved God exists???
256.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
How is believing in religion rational?
257.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
It was a bug that they fixed.
258.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
American WeChat already exists. It’s called the iOS App Store.
259.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
X.com redirects me to .twitter.com, which fails to load.
260.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
I think you wife is wrong for the right reason. Her observation is astute, but is essentially the same observation that network effects impact all programming languages. E.g. there are more JS libraries so people are more likely to use JS,
261.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
This is a really cool idea. Do you do any management of subscription status so that users can unsubscribe from emails? That would be really useful.
262.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Yea I definitely wouldn’t use Instacart. The incentives aren’t aligned between the store, picker, and customer.
263.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Do you have a Whole Foods? For basically the same amount of time it takes to make your grocery list, you can have your groceries delivered. This saves the shopping time and the driving time.
264.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Order groceries online. It's much more convenient for large orders.
265.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Enlighten me
266.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
> instead of allowing small groups of narrow-minded do-gooder elites to do so. Isn’t that the entire history of UK governance? They literally have something called the House of Lords.
267.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
I think the real takeaway is the professor adamantly demanding his postdoc get an interview. In business or academia, leveraging personal connections is the only guaranteed way to make career progress.
268.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
That was a really long response, but I think you missed this: > and the body was only “designed” to tolerate a narrow band of substances that are encountered in the natural world.
269.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Care to provide some examples?
270.
▲
by
rcme
3y ago
Nanoplastics are 1nm - 1 micrometer. So that is smaller than a bacteria.
More ›