rbrbr

7 ms·

31.
by rbrbr 8y ago
Any ever created decision making algorithm is nothing more than programs. A machine is not thinking. It’s executing code.
32.
by rbrbr 8y ago
At halfway through the article it becomes clear that the writer has kids to take care of and his own job. That’s what should have been in the title to clarify the scope, and I would have saved the time reading this article. It’s obviously a
33.
by rbrbr 8y ago
People are too slow with change. Our worldly scenario is unique because we can basically predict our end now. Like weather forecast becomes more precise the closer it gets to the forecasted day, we know more precisely how and when we will e
34.
by rbrbr 8y ago
Headlines like this are tedious. The obvious question without even reading the article is "for what". Obviously IQ does only matter in some contexts. If you don't see that you might lack some of it.
35.
by rbrbr 8y ago
No, im surprised no one agrees. But if i zoom out a bit and look at our current world im not surprised at all.
36.
by rbrbr 8y ago
I didn’t expect nuclear energy advocates here.
37.
by rbrbr 8y ago
This guy uses rather confusing descriptions of his theories and ideas. I respect his approach but other are much better in explaining these topics.
38.
by rbrbr 9y ago
I stopped reading their reasoning after a few sentences. Let people have their opinion, good and bad and stop whining around trying to be “all is cool”.
39.
by rbrbr 9y ago
Build cars with the driver seat on the left then. All this discussion over an obvious flaw which removed would solve the problem.