Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ratww
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
81 ms
·
841.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
TuneCore has really gone to hell after it was sold. I know horror stories from musicians that used them years ago but since had to move away because of technical and support issues.
842.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Yep. And it doesn't even have to be a call center, manual verification would be enough.
843.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
This is one of my major Hacker News pet peeves. People talk about any law whatsoever and people immediately jump to "yeah but what about this crazy edge case" as if the legal system itself doesn't take those into account. T
844.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Publishing to Maven definitely works. Updating SQL drivers, etc, is not trivial because you don't have control over the code, but if you have enough integration tests (or at least proper failure handling) for your separate library then
845.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> That's maybe a bit unfair. There are a lot of microservice shops, but I haven't heard many who do this Franken-monolith thing. Remember that infamous microservice dependency graph from Uber? I guess Facebook was famous for d
846.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
For a grid-style gallery you can have a container for each image with a fixed size (the maximum size you want an image to be) and the image itself can use max-width and max-height with the same size of the container. If your aspect ratios a
847.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> The only two websites I've encountered where I actually notice it, and remember that I did that, is Google Translate and a particular government website I use about once a year. That's probably because of the Google Materia
848.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Sure, but complaining and proving it is possible to have smaller/faster websites is important because it can inspire and lead to better tools, libraries, services, standards, techniques and even new fads (!) in the future. I understand
849.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> I said I don't know which library would let me make C# method calls from a Java Spring runtime, presumably in the same process. Do you? Feel free to share a link. You don't need a library for that, it's is part of the
850.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
I agree with you. But I think GP has a point, he just picked wrong qualities... I believe in software engineering especially it is important to have empathy (to code in a way that others understand) and humbleness (to accept your limitation
851.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> I don't know what that library is right now Are you serious? In which language do you program that you don't have to use multiple libraries daily? You just talked about NPM. In your example, the C# could output DLLs that ha
852.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Oh wow… If it is, I will probably rethink my subscription. I have uploaded a lot of music I bought in other services or ripped legally from CDs I physically own, adding DRM to things I own feels immoral to me. Wish there were more alternati
853.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Running a single instance doesn’t mean not having a backup.
854.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> I'm not sure how I would accomplish this in a monolith. With a library. Depending on what you’re doing (process ran a few times a day?), maybe even spawning a process is enough. > what options would I have if I, say, needed
855.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
If you are already doing code reviews, it is trivial to setup. If you’re using microservices + monorepo, you need exactly the same thing, otherwise people will just commit in your service. If you’re relying on multiple repositories, you can
856.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> With a monolith any random developer can go and flip some private method to public, import it way across the modules, and presto you are now building a ball of mud. If "any developer" can do it, then the problem is not with
857.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> without a server component PostgREST is the server component.
858.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
It works pretty well with frontend frameworks, as long as you keep the interfaces simple and don't try to cheat and put business logic into the frontend. IMO the the source of truth for Views and Stored Procedures should be a git repos
859.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Wether it makes sense to put business logic in procedures really depends on what's involved in "business logic". For data-heavy apps with very complex schemas, your code can actually get more readable inside stored procedures
860.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
My point was that the point of Rails vs React isn't about features but rather about architecture. I agree with you, I'm just trying to strengthen your argument.
861.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
To answer your edit: > However if that is the case then I find it weird that the sample wouldn't have been cleared by their big hip-hop labels and that the Winstons were aware of it's use but nobody cared enough to do anything
862.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
> All I was saying that there was also a lot of sample swapping going on and given the prevalence of the Amen break I'd wager a lot of producers had the sample included with a percussion set without knowing its origin I never said
863.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
They do have Edge Functions, which is similar to Lambda. Same with Netlify and Cloudflare. For DBs you have to seek somewhere else. It's not really something that will run your Rails backend, but it has the potential of doing a lot for
864.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Netlify is also at 2bn [1] I think it makes complete sense. There's a lot of room to grow in this space. There's a lot of money going into tech salaries, and even then it's hard to find people. Anything that saves developer t
865.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
The Creator app he runs on the Atari ST is a MIDI sequencer, not a DAW or sampler. The machine is probably not fast enough for realtime sampling. For sampling he is very well known for having used a pair of Akai S950s, each with 2.25MB of R
866.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
There is a lot of overlap between Rails and React, and you probably could use both to make 90% of the apps out there or more, but what really matters is the 5% that you can only make on Rails and the 5% you can only make on React. Plus the
867.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
I don't disagree, but saying that people adopted React because of things like "client-side updates without full page refreshes" kinda walks right into the GP's trap: doing it it was already possible with Rails several
868.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
In the case of HTML pages, there is ongoing coordination. The server expects the client to have accessed something before that said "please input amount in dollars" or maybe "please input amount in cents". But if there i
869.
▲
by
ratww
5y ago
Because I was a journalist in a previous life, I remember that around the same timeframe (a few years before time), the Brazilian media also adopted the same model. There were two huge radio stations that co-owned other major ones in differ
870.
▲
How the Telecom Act of 1996 changed music for the worse
(threadreaderapp.com)
8 points
by
ratww
5y ago
|
3 comments
More ›