rat9988

16 ms·

241.
by rat9988 3y ago
After reading the comments on the PR, I don't understand the doomsaying here in your comment.
242.
by rat9988 3y ago
It makes the advice go from practical to superstitious though.
243.
by rat9988 3y ago
Shouldn't I be skeptical when there is an inclination to change more than necessary? No you should not. This is not a website where they present a new web framework that respects your browser.
244.
by rat9988 3y ago
The usb c tangent is kind of weird. It feels like an anti regulation stand for the sake of it.
245.
by rat9988 3y ago
There are many many studies on melatonin, it's not like we know nothing.
246.
by rat9988 3y ago
Your link proves that european countries are close to US. Some better, some worse.
247.
by rat9988 3y ago
Can you tell us more about your experience? What was the superior solution?
248.
by rat9988 3y ago
He probably won't even get 6 figure consulting gig.
249.
by rat9988 3y ago
Can you tell us more about how the government picked the winner?
250.
by rat9988 3y ago
You are way too apologetic with the original post. It was not just a set of facts. You could feel the superior attitude. It's kind of obvious in the last sentence. The person you answer did well to call it out.
251.
by rat9988 3y ago
Can you tell us why you think people were bullied, and why apple's primary concern is consumer UX and nothing else?
252.
by rat9988 3y ago
Because he wrote the key points in a function instead of properly explained english.
253.
by rat9988 3y ago
Using functions in text just makes it hard to read.
254.
by rat9988 3y ago
Or maybe he would have died 10 years earlier without it.
255.
by rat9988 3y ago
I see why it could be a problem for using it, but you can still try it and then delete your data?
256.
by rat9988 3y ago
I'm not sure how it is related to being first class. You cannot use a function as a variable.
257.
by rat9988 3y ago
Which is expected given the context. The shakiest source is enough for something claimed without source.
258.
by rat9988 3y ago
It is a no depending on what you sell. If they sell original pictures, you cannot copy them. You are allowed to sell the same products, but not to copy them.
259.
by rat9988 3y ago
Paperspace?
260.
by rat9988 3y ago
Click on the link, it's linked inside.
261.
by rat9988 3y ago
Don't worry, the private money will not go to their pocket but to fund future projects of the university, lab or whatever. It's a way to lessen the burden on taxpayers, and to shift it to those who benefit the most from it.
262.
by rat9988 3y ago
Great, but it's ok to write it's not interesting too then?
263.
by rat9988 3y ago
"This is the commonly accepted definition of open source and there’s very few who would consider your custom license open source." You might think so but I disagree.
264.
by rat9988 3y ago
Open Source Initiative is not an authority here. We had this debate many many times. You may not agree with this point of view, but let's not make it as if yours is the universal one.
265.
by rat9988 3y ago
WWouldn't you lose some of the performance benefit?
266.
by rat9988 3y ago
Now, imagine if you had harmless alternatives. Maybe it will help you expand your thinking.
267.
by rat9988 3y ago
Well, sometimes you are not the targeted market.
268.
by rat9988 3y ago
And what if github didn't have such mechanism? They should swallow the loss as they should have known better? And more importantly, as they weren't documented, how could the author be certain there is a safeguard and he won't
269.
by rat9988 3y ago
It is malicious as he knows he will harm the service to be able to draw whatever conclusion. This is not a case where the end justifies the means.
270.
by rat9988 3y ago
While for most people ends won't meet without working, making the ends meet in this context has a bit more specific meaning you glossed over. The difference is subtle but makes the whole difference.

More ›