rat9988

11 ms·

181.
by rat9988 3y ago
Why did you post a picture of a deleted post. Op doesn't wish to share it anymore. You could have respected his wish.
182.
by rat9988 3y ago
This has nothing to do with pragmatism. Just update the version number. This is the pragmatic way.
183.
by rat9988 3y ago
Oh I see, after rereading, your explanation matches better.
184.
by rat9988 3y ago
It has nothing to do with google and alphabet. Apart from being a good search engine and a competitor within the same space.
185.
by rat9988 3y ago
Well, not the same defense money he is talking about.
186.
by rat9988 3y ago
This is closer to paranoia than really concerns about the guy you answer. Million of years or billions don't matter much in the context of what he is saying, nor does it really serve his point. I see the mistake but not the malice. And
187.
by rat9988 3y ago
And this is why he (and I) thinks you didn't read. It's mentioned on the first paragraphs too.
188.
by rat9988 3y ago
I find the profit metric more useful.
189.
by rat9988 3y ago
It's open enough. Meta contributed a lot to open source ML, and their llama license is open enough.
190.
by rat9988 3y ago
He didn't get the downvotes because of the technologies though.
191.
by rat9988 3y ago
Thank you for your answer, and interesting repo by the way, hope your implementation of the lite version goes well :)
192.
by rat9988 3y ago
It's in beta, and from the screens I see on the website it's a very similar look and feel.
193.
by rat9988 3y ago
It's not welfare that attracts people but the better economic prospects. No idea about Bruxelles and Amsterdam, but I work in Paris and it is quite safe.
194.
by rat9988 3y ago
Thread per architecture is a topic in and by itself in computer science. I feel like you are talking about it as if the author invented it to solve its needs.
195.
by rat9988 3y ago
I'm pretty surprised you think the author should have bothered talking about actors. Why ?
196.
by rat9988 3y ago
I'm not why we should see him as a "bro".
197.
by rat9988 3y ago
if it's owner operated then the owner isn't concerned by this salary discussion.
198.
by rat9988 3y ago
They are both the same. Edit: to people who downvote, can you tell me why it is different? Aren't companies in USA censoring fearing governmental reaction, and the same for chinese companies?
199.
by rat9988 3y ago
Citizens should be shareholders, but let's not stretch the analogy.
200.
by rat9988 3y ago
"So DDG's upper bound seems to be however good Bing is and honestly Bing isn't that good. What is their path to improving? I'm not sure they have one. But I don't think Google's relationship with Apple is the c
201.
by rat9988 3y ago
They probably never said they explicitely support steam deck. It's probably steam deck users that are interested in it, and valve doesn't provide a testing platform.
202.
by rat9988 3y ago
So no one should release on linux? Because no one can test every linux distribution.
203.
by rat9988 3y ago
This is not a goalpost shift. It's THE argument. I'm not sure what arguments are there for alternative narratives.
204.
by rat9988 3y ago
People were given two reasons, at least one of them must be wrong. Probably both.
205.
by rat9988 3y ago
Indeed, but corporate speak is a lote more warmer usually. They at least know his resume, have talked a bit, and then they sugar coat everything.
206.
by rat9988 3y ago
This number is often cited on reddit too. It's only true if you cherry pick studies.
207.
by rat9988 3y ago
Sure, that's how it works, and reservation is the solution to it, not the other way around.
208.
by rat9988 3y ago
I have yet to see, with the exception of the software world, engineering with such loose process.
209.
by rat9988 3y ago
"something that will net out to a few thousand dollars max per employee" This is quite significant.
210.
by rat9988 3y ago
Does it mean you won't go on them at all?

More ›