rat87

38 ms·

481.
by rat87 4y ago
That is because that's what they do. The supreme court is a political organ making very conservative political decisions. Much of the time the sort of headlines you seem to prefer would be navel gazing that's not important to most
482.
by rat87 4y ago
They did by creating departments and delegating to them
483.
by rat87 4y ago
Or you know they could delegate their authority to an agency staffed with experts. I'm all for Congress actually doing its job but we all know they won't and that passing each regulation by hand isn't possible without some so
484.
by rat87 4y ago
Abortions are a constitutional right or were before this ruling As for the 2nd amendment many people think it didn't necessarily refer to an individual right
485.
by rat87 4y ago
That was a correct ruling which was replaced by getting biased refs
486.
by rat87 4y ago
The ruling with regards to interstate commerce was obviously correct. Local businesses even vertically integrated ones are part of a national marketplace
487.
by rat87 4y ago
Because that is the common case in our nations history especially with civil rights, leaving it up to the states lets bad state governments infringe on their citizens rights
488.
by rat87 4y ago
It makes no sense for a state to be able to deny people their rights. Generally in this nations history leaving it up to the states has been a very bad idea
489.
by rat87 4y ago
Just telling you the personal responsibility/slut shaming argument for banning abortion makes your side look weak as hell. At least those who claim fetus are alive have a somewhat respectable looking moral framework but when you reveal
490.
by rat87 4y ago
It wasn't. This ruling is not about the constitution it's about power. Roe vs Wade was fine. This ruling is based on the fact that Republicans after decades got 6 extreme social conservatives on the court who decided they don&#x27
491.
by rat87 4y ago
There may be nothing intrinsically bad but it tends to be associated with bad ideas and cause bad outcomes.
492.
by rat87 4y ago
The constitution is quite explicit that the rights it protects are not limited to those explicitly listed I don't see what antivax has to do with anything
493.
by rat87 4y ago
They are. The constitution explicitly stated that rights outside of those explicitly listed exist. The right to chose is one of those rights. There was nothing wrong with the ruling except that the supreme court majority personally disliked
494.
by rat87 4y ago
> It is not possible for Ukraine to win This is backwards, its not possible for Russia to win since Russia is having much more trouble with getting recruits and training them then Ukraine is and can't easily manufacture replacements
495.
by rat87 4y ago
they've failed to achieve their major objectives and now are struggling with much smaller objectives. But evidence suggests they still want to conquer the whole country no matter how ridiculous. https://www.reuters.com/
496.
by rat87 4y ago
War is always a risk. No matter how over optimistic he was it's too big of a risk for a small poll bounce. This is about revanchist nationalistism/securing legacy/rebuilding the empire
497.
by rat87 4y ago
No it's in Germanys interest to f*ck Russia up as much as they can financially (and in terms of weapon shipments ( in the hope it ends the war sooner. And diversify their energy. Germany's intrest is for Ukraine to win as quick as
498.
by rat87 4y ago
I'm not saying this won't be wasted but in also skeptical of your policy? And why do we care so much about manufacturing anyway?
499.
by rat87 4y ago
Yes it doesn't revolve around America vs Russia You have to consider the EU vs Russia. It's not in EU's or Germany's intrest to keep trading with Russia
500.
by rat87 4y ago
It wasn't thwarted at every turn. Maybe we should have but we didn't, at least not at every turn. We did warn then it was a bad idea. Other countries especially countries in Eastern EU warned them it was a bad idea. And lo and b
501.
by rat87 4y ago
https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/27/india_it_would_be_fab... India is hoping it can convince Intel and TSMC to set up fabs in the country as part of their multibillion-dollar manufacturing expansion bluepr
502.
by rat87 4y ago
I was thinking probably Cobol will be first since it has at least 63 years already but apparently LISP is technically a year older. Fortran is a year older but I'm not sure it will last as long as Cobol/Lisp (it's losing out
503.
by rat87 4y ago
I'm worried about it. My understanding is that the GIL removal was still slower then with GIL, but that he added useful unrelated speedups to compensate. If the speedups get into 3.11 but no gil doesn't will they accept a signific
504.
by rat87 4y ago
I meant more that there are many different denominations that claim to be Protestant, many taking different opinions on abortion. Not that opinion among lay protestants is not 100% which I agree with
505.
by rat87 4y ago
python supports type hints and IDEs can use those hints as well as document genration
506.
by rat87 4y ago
A very broad application of the commerce clause isn't that controversial, it's also pretty obvious/logical since basically everything effects interstate commerce
507.
by rat87 4y ago
While some more traditional Jews dislike legal abortion for cases that don't relate to health/mental health and are after 40 days Jewish law is pretty clear that a fetus is not alive/a person with rights until it born and tha
508.
by rat87 4y ago
Protestants aren't pretty fractured but a number of groups even fairly conservative ones(like southern Baptist convention) didn't care or were pro choice. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments&#
509.
by rat87 4y ago
That is plainly untrue. Tons of legal scholars think the logic is extremely sound. The shortcoming with Roe is that due to a combination of bad luck and not willing to be as ruthless as Republicans on supreme court appointments. The argumen
510.
by rat87 4y ago
> The question before the court in Roe v. Wade was not “Would the world be better if abortion were legal?” The question was, “Does the US Constitution prohibit states from making abortion illegal?” This is a fundamental misunderstanding

More ›