Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rasz
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
its a decomp, it wasnt your code to begin with
32.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
What was the point of the fundraiser? As far as I understood it at the time those were funds needed for lawyers to sue Bambu Labs. Are they backpedaling? This reads like 'we will use the funds to talk about it a lot' :|
33.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
Why wouldnt they? no senior Post Office executives or Fujitsu employees have gone to prison after Horizon IT scandal.
34.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
ORB coolers were AMD die killers because you twisted them to latch.
35.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
>THERMTRIP And this wasnt the only mechanism. Before THERMTRIP# triggers there is also diode based temp sensor embedded in later CPUs (THERMDP, THERMDN) Mobo designer can use to trigger either STPCLK# directly Pentium® III Processor Acti
36.
▲
by
rasz
1mo ago
Dont forget the fun when screwdriver slipped and gouged delicate CPU data lines near the socket.
37.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
We tried that, doesnt work out in general computers running more than one task. DSPs do that, Atari Jaguar, Sony PS2 and PS3 did, all the GPUs manually manage cache. More than one task and you start a fight over resources, have to manage hi
38.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
>concessions its like those people never learn
39.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
1995
40.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
> mid-development DSP chips (sort of proto 56002) "The physical pinout of the DSP56001 is different from the DSP56002" https://digisolutions.de/downloads/Differences56001_56002.pd... Buying new unproven wo
41.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
> faster chip from Motorola could have been only MC88100+MC88200 So all Next had to do was 1 Develop another set of ASICs for fully incompatible CPU bus in parallel and in secret 2 Develop another motherboard in parallel and in secret 3
42.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
The point is there were no chips to put on the Next Cube that would make it faster in 1988, and the whole system was designed and tuned for specific fixed clock so bus overclocking is also very unlikely. The only possibility is April 1989 a
43.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
I dont know if im buying magic CPU upgrade story. CPU/FPU are soldered and non overclockable. Motorola didnt have a super beefed 68030 version, extra special 68882 fpu, nor faster pin compatible 56001. The only socket on board is for
44.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
> "solve" by playing over and over nah, you were supposed to buy official Hint Books https://www.sierragamers.com/hint-books/ or call 0-700 tip line. This cruel design printed money.
45.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
https://decafjedi.itch.io/stair-quest surprisingly fun
46.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
Sure, but the question wasnt about solving world hunger, wars and global piracy :) Its a solution for limiting pirate-ability of this particular CDs contents. Encode data in a way short ECC code dictated over the phone is enough to reconstr
47.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
> since there is only 1 master disc you destroy every retail disk a little https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49343326
48.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
Very firsts Philips/DEC LMSI controller did DMA https://github.com/AkBKukU/CM153-Repro https://github.com/AkBKukU/CM153-Repro/blob/main/EDA/ISA-Car... Panasonic (MKE) was
49.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
>gave users control over the directory structure try making an AUX directory, or CON file, or PRN
50.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
Every game separately encrypted then compressed into solid archives. Pressed in a way every game lands on different precise height of CD, padded before compression if necessary so it takes enough space on CD. Separate machine burning tiny h
51.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
This is often a gilded cage. Think about it. On one hand Great, you dont have to redesign your SBC, that would take whole ~1-2 engineering man months (small simple SBC at not bureaucratic nightmare small to middle size company, obviously ma
52.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
CH32v303 costs more than much more capable ARM based RP2354A
53.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
VIA rights did not come from Cyrix. Cyrix famously had to skirt IP laws by using TI and IBM foundries because those two companies had full Intel 3rd party licenses. Cyrix was sued and paid big bucks settlement just to be able to use Intels
54.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
With current US administration? Do nothing, win.
55.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
>It's impossible to run full UBO (not Lite MV3 version) on current versions on Chrome. Current version of Chrome seems to be 152.0.7977.39 released August 14, 2026. August 14, 2026 Chromium 152.0.7977.38 based vivaldis napshot http
56.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
For all possible MV2 extensions this is unsustainable for a small company. Supporting just uBO used by tens of millions of people? pretty doable as it only relies on few hooks into C functions that arent going anywhere.
57.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
uBO still works in newest Vivaldi.
58.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
Vivaldi 8.1 still supports it (Chromium 150) as loaded unpacked extension. Edit: and latest August 14, 2026 Chromium 152.0.7977.38 based Snapshot https://vivaldi.com/blog/desktop/address-field-calculator-an... has
59.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
Size cap doesnt mean much when its a constant stream of small writes.
60.
▲
by
rasz
2mo ago
>Examples of games that either required or benefited from MMX enhancements in their software renderer were Eraser Turnabout, POD, and Extreme Assault POD "Designed for Intel MMX" meant _one_ optional audio filter effect. It was
More ›