rasterizer

10 ms·

61.
by rasterizer 13y ago
The author seems to be attributing some general and unrelated comments to Google Reader - very irresponsible on her part.
62.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Not merely a reinstatement: OAuth 2.0 as well.
63.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Loaning is permitted: https://support.google.com/glass/answer/3064131?hl=en&re...
64.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Google Drive does that as well.
65.
by rasterizer 13y ago
I don't think you know what "proprietary" means, you don't pay Google to use SPDY. They solved a problem and made something better, case in point Facebook and Twitter among others have already deployed it. If you do some research you'll fin
66.
by rasterizer 13y ago
I don't see how you can jump to these false assumptions and then call my comment senseless. Here is the "Blink manifesto" if you will: A proposal for un-prefixing https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/m/?fromgroups... As for SP
67.
by rasterizer 13y ago
This. Chromium alone puts them in the plus column standard-wise. Usually apps are judged on merit, yet in Google's case there is the misconception that they have to defend every engineering decision they make. I don't see how this is a hot
68.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Before someone veers into a misguded USSR analogy (too late: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5753890 ) note that Github also disabled downloads months ago: https://github.com/blog/1302-goodbye-uploads Seems like it's a pain point fo
69.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Oh, so this is about a "Gilt" employee being peeved about the presentation featuring the "Google+ Sign In" integration with "Fancy"(a competitor?)? Well no, it's not anti competitive because when a user logs into a service she implicitly ex
70.
by rasterizer 13y ago
I see, then no convincing case was made to support that unless if you count the lament about experimentation and their numerous products, and no reasonable connection was made between that and 'evilness'.
71.
by rasterizer 13y ago
I'm not quite sure what the author is going on about in that post: 'google is good but they make money so they're not good', 'google makes lots of products, then kills some of them so they're evil', 'google design is not perfect so I don't
72.
by rasterizer 13y ago
That comment reads more like reflex than anything with much thought put behind it: "Google is closing a service; Google is the new Microsoft" that old tired cliche. First of all it's far form an unexpected announcement seeing as they have b
73.
by rasterizer 13y ago
Non-"off the record" chats were always archived, difference is that controlling the archiving behaviour is no longer done by client rather via a new web interface at: https://mail.google.com/mail/#chats http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2