raspyberr

11 ms·

31.
by raspyberr 2y ago
>what the hell are y'all doing on your computers that is so freaky anyway? Discussing homosexuality in Russia or critising the government in China. Not everyone lives a stressless cushy life like yours.
32.
by raspyberr 2y ago
Don't implement the scanning for images, photos, videos, links. Just send the image as a base64 encoded text string. Decode when received.
33.
by raspyberr 2y ago
To the people saying it's your fault just pay for it. You do know they'll end up putting ads in to the paid versions too right? Why wouldn't they? It's free money for them.
34.
by raspyberr 2y ago
That sounds like the script of a Marques Brownlee video he did recently.
35.
by raspyberr 2y ago
You pay for everything in life and it's getting more expensive. You got shares in google or something?
36.
by raspyberr 2y ago
But Signal specifically used phone numbers to leverage the already existing social graph on your phone. The numbers were never transferred or stored by Signal. You can literally see what information they gave when they were subpoenad: http
37.
by raspyberr 2y ago
I stopped and uninstalled. It is very simply an overreach just to play a game.
38.
by raspyberr 2y ago
Imagine having a coordinate system be owned by a private company.
39.
by raspyberr 2y ago
Is there an RSS feed of this at all? Tried a few pages and they don't add to my reader.
40.
by raspyberr 3y ago
I think that second retort that everyone says is so weak. People are trading their privacy for services not for nothing. Think how many people would actually give you their phone if you said you'd give them $20 or cleaned their house o
41.
by raspyberr 3y ago
They are free by default. Digital goods don't follow regular economics. A carpenter who makes a table can make ONE sale from that table. How many sales of a digital good can you have? What entitles you to potentially unlimited money fr
42.
by raspyberr 3y ago
Don't worry. If he pirates it, he won't be depriving anyone else of playing it. No one will miss out.
43.
by raspyberr 3y ago
>"infinite spinner" >"This site uses features not available in older browsers." >Enable Javascript. Black plaintext on white background with hyperlinks. Revolutionary.
44.
by raspyberr 3y ago
I've always rationalised it as: When you're one years old, 1 year is your whole life. When you're 100 years old, 1 year is 1/100th of your life.
45.
by raspyberr 3y ago
>For sixty years, computing has emphasized speed I wish day to day software emphasized speed
46.
by raspyberr 3y ago
Why so much hostility towards suckless? They've made a handfull of programs and some of the work well. The author hasn't even linked any software they've made despite saying that they "spent most of my free time writing
47.
by raspyberr 3y ago
http://www.phrack.org/issues/49/14.html#article
48.
by raspyberr 3y ago
>Rewritten with the 'tone'... Sounds just like the tone you're talking about.
49.
by raspyberr 3y ago
I use GrapheneOS without a Google account and it's great.
50.
by raspyberr 3y ago
They still exist... sounds like you're addicted to big tech.
51.
by raspyberr 3y ago
This is literally the first of these articles where the examples work without JS. Everything else I've ever seen posted here usually has the snippets hosted on some CDN and requires JS to work.
52.
by raspyberr 3y ago
So is this a trailer for a new TV show? I don't see anything that says anything about the game.
53.
by raspyberr 3y ago
How come this video isn't just showing caching at work?
54.
by raspyberr 3y ago
And we can't forget about Windows of course! With WSL it's basically Linux with a bunch of Windows cruft added on.
55.
by raspyberr 3y ago
No Facebook account, no Google account, no Reddit account, no Twitter, no TikTok, no Instagram, no WhatsApp. My last parasite to remove is Microsoft/Hotmail and frankly this place.
56.
by raspyberr 3y ago
How can you have an article about how things look without plenty of pictures? This article has one picture at the start to catch your attention but it isn't a picture of anything that's specifically referred to in the text.
57.
by raspyberr 3y ago
I would lean towards 10 years but only because leaning towards an extreme number would probably result in a reasonable number like 20/30/40 anyway. The only part of copyright that I haven't convinced myself of is whether bein
58.
by raspyberr 3y ago
>It is not a crime to deprive someone of their income stream You can't just fire people without a reason though right? Some job rights are protected to some extent in some countries.
59.
by raspyberr 3y ago
Yawn. Stuff from the 1920s is only now entering the public domain. Argument doesn't stand when copyright is extended to such absurd lengths.
60.
by raspyberr 3y ago
Nina Paley has made comics, films, shorts, and she sells merchandise. Clearly something's working for her.

More ›