raspasov

7 ms·

91.
by raspasov 1y ago
This.
92.
by raspasov 1y ago
Grok has consistently been one of the best models I've used for deep research (no API use). Grok 4 looks even more promising.
93.
by raspasov 1y ago
Yay!
94.
by raspasov 1y ago
I think I fully understand it. I was just making an analogy which is imprecise by definition. If you are inputting untrusted content in an LLM that has abilities to run code and side-effect the outside world a vulnerability is guaranteed. I
95.
by raspasov 1y ago
You are just plain wrong. Also, social mobility is preferable to inequality. Inequality is terrible on many levels. Everyone is poor – low inequality (1) Everyone is middle class – low inequality (2) Many poor, few rich – high inequality (3
96.
by raspasov 1y ago
Bulgaria has an internal coherence problem. There are brilliant people but also many who believe bullshit communist fairytales. 1. Many people have unrealistic expectations. In reality, no one is coming to save you, and 99% of the time, you
97.
by raspasov 1y ago
I see no mistake (not associated with Supabase).
98.
by raspasov 1y ago
I have no association with Supabase, but in their defense, apart from adding a caution note, there's nothing else that Supabase needs to do, from my perspective. As far as I am concerned, this is not a serious security hole if the huma
99.
by raspasov 1y ago
I don't understand how that's more subtle than allowing random queries. It only feels different due to the additional probabilistic layer of indirection (the LLM), but the ability is still there. > who can already submit random
100.
by raspasov 1y ago
Sure, it's not a guaranteed fix, given that stored procedures are effectively Turing complete, and if we assume that any stored procedure can be written and combined in arbitrary ways with other procedures. Common sense of caution is s
101.
by raspasov 1y ago
If the LLM has access to executing only specific stored procedures (I assume modern DBMSs can achieve that granularity, but I haven't checked), then the problem mostly (entirely?) disappears. It limits the utility of the LLM, as it can
102.
by raspasov 1y ago
This should be the one-line summary at the top of the article.
103.
by raspasov 1y ago
MCP is the new GraphQL.
104.
by raspasov 1y ago
I was thinking the same thing. Who, except for a total naive beginner, exposes a database directly to an LLM that accepts public input, of all things?
105.
by raspasov 1y ago
The MCP hype is real, but top of HN? That's like saying that if anyone can submit random queries to a Postgres database with full access, it can leak the database. That's like middle-school-level SQL trivia.
106.
by raspasov 1y ago
I keep seeing news articles that claim Grok is flawed or biased recently, but I've been unable to replicate any such behavior on my computer. That being said, I don't ask any controversial or political questions; I use it to searc
107.
by raspasov 1y ago
If someone creates an LLM that is guaranteed to never output the word "apologize" I'll pay them a number of dollars for it.
108.
by raspasov 1y ago
Your argument is unconvincing. Even if the HFT market is 100 times the smallest estimate, it's still a relatively small portion of the world economy, which is approximately $100 trillion. HFT is a fascinating intersection of finance&#x
109.
by raspasov 1y ago
The ghost of Charlie Munger has entered the chat.
110.
by raspasov 1y ago
Not surprising people like Waymos even though they are a bit more expensive. For a few more dollars you get: - arguably a very nice, clean car - same, ahem, Driver and driving style With the basic UberX it’s a crapshoot. Good drivers, wild
111.
by raspasov 1y ago
Sure, the market, but HFT is relatively tiny as a market and the profit it brings. Not to mention, it's essentially a zero-sum game. Brought to you by your favorite Google LLM search result: "The global high-frequency trading (HFT
112.
by raspasov 1y ago
Of course, I have no original thoughts. Something is not created out of nothing. That would be Astrology, perhaps :). But the difference between a human and an LLM is that humans can go out in the world and test their hypothesis. Literally
113.
by raspasov 1y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've heard, Waymo employs heuristics, rules, neural networks, and various other techniques that are combined and organized by humans into a system. It's not an end-to-end neural network.
114.
by raspasov 1y ago
There's a lot in here. I agree with a lot of it. However, you've shifted the goal post from AGI to being useful in specific scenarios. I have no problem with that statement. It can write decent unit tests and even find hard-to-spo
115.
by raspasov 1y ago
I think he's generally optimistic which is a net positive.
116.
by raspasov 1y ago
Anyone who claims that a poorly definined concept, AGI, is right around the corner is most likely: - trying to sell something - high on their own stories - high on exogenous compounds - all of the above LLMs are good at language. They are O
117.
by raspasov 1y ago
In a wild turn of events, this is actually a genius marketing piece paid for by Hims & Hers.
118.
by raspasov 1y ago
"sildenafil and tadalafil — an illegal combination" It is not an "illegal combination".
119.
by raspasov 1y ago
I like it, I think it will be great after ironing out a few obvious issues.
120.
by raspasov 1y ago
Future market?

More ›