raphinou

13 ms·

151.
by raphinou 2y ago
I thought to have seen some negative comments about its security, anyone knowing more about it?
152.
by raphinou 2y ago
FSharpPacker works on scripts (with extension .fsx) written with F# and usually run with `dotnet fsi`. For the F# advent calendar [1] I recently blogged about how those scripts are a viable starting point for developing an application in F#
153.
by raphinou 2y ago
I agree it depends on the situation, but there still are some situations (like small apps) where I see swarm as the way to go. Yours is probably different.
154.
by raphinou 2y ago
That's indeed the opinion of the author. Note however that at this time all elements used in the setup described on dockerswarm.rocks are maintained. I started using swarm in 2022 and I documented my decision [1], and my reasoning for
155.
by raphinou 2y ago
I am particularly happy with docker swarm with traefik as described here: https://dockerswarm.rocks/traefik/ Incredibly easy to setup and manage for usual small scale deployments. I use it as one node swarms, and I ha
156.
by raphinou 2y ago
Not pretending my project is large or important, but it is an example of a non trivial project written in fsharp: https://gitlab.com/myowndb/myowndb/
157.
by raphinou 2y ago
Here are 2 possibilities: - https://monazita.gitlab.io/monazita/ (i developed it for a project of mine while learning fsharp. Basically works but could be more polished and is pgsql only) - https://github.co
158.
by raphinou 2y ago
Not lunni's dev, but a Swarm fan :-) I'm a swarm user, but using single node swarms. It's the best solution I found for deploying apps. A lot of projects publish docker compose files, and those are easily usable with Swarm af
159.
by raphinou 2y ago
How's Lunni going? Is swarm working well? I remember an announcement of it some time ago :-)
160.
by raphinou 3y ago
I'm sure you can find a similar example for any significant FOSS project, including GNOME, but that doesn't mean it is a general stance adopted by developers when a new bug report comes in.
161.
by raphinou 3y ago
Interesting to see this as I recently did a show HN without much success about an F# library also handling raw sql. I enjoy working with SQL directly, though I understand it has pros and cons. If you need specially crafted queries, it is a
162.
by raphinou 3y ago
I'll share my own project: https://www.myowndb.com/ , running since 2006. I neglected the project for a couple of years but recently launched the new version. It's open source: https://gitlab.com/m
163.
Show HN: Monazita, F# library for working with PostgreSQL(monazita.gitlab.io)
4 points by raphinou 3y ago|0 comments
164.
by raphinou 3y ago
It was onivim2. Iirc it was a one-man show, and stopped when funding dried up. I also hoped to see a a lot from it. Maybe the dev took too much work on his plate, with an unproven language with limited libraries? https://github.c
165.
by raphinou 3y ago
I had explored the opportunity [1] to help send files securely based on the Firefox Send fork available at [2]. It proved very difficult to sell with actually no interest in such a product (and I probably sold it the wrong way). I still use
166.
by raphinou 3y ago
Wow, gave a strange feeling to see DabbleDB mentioned. I had launched a product in the same category. It didn't get traction, and I lost interest in it for some time, but I kept it running and it's still available and has just bee
167.
by raphinou 3y ago
I should have made it clearer, but I wrote my comment in reaction to his mention that he "never properly evaluated Jsonnet".
168.
by raphinou 3y ago
I'm guessing here, but maybe you see these configuration languages as templates? However a configuration language is much more than that. For example, jsonnet lets you combine objects and override deeply nested fields [1]. I'm not
169.
by raphinou 3y ago
jsonnet[1] and kapitan[2] are the tools I currently use. Their learning curve is not optimal (and I tried to contribute to smoothen it with a jsonnet course[3] and a 'get started wit kapitan' blog post[4]), but once used to it it&
170.
by raphinou 3y ago
Docker Swarm uses compose files too. Swarm is still used and maintained, though I agree it is much smaller than k8s. But that's not a reason to dismiss it I think. I went for it because it's so easy to use that if I need to migrat
171.
by raphinou 3y ago
Genuine question: I'm curious to know why you deploy with docker-compose and not Docker swarm (eg like described at https://dockerswarm.rocks/ ). I'm deploying the same kind of apps, and ended up with Swarm which
172.
by raphinou 3y ago
Thanks for your feedback, I'll fix it later today!
173.
Show HN: New Version of MyOwnDB(myowndb.com)
3 points by raphinou 3y ago|2 comments
174.
by raphinou 3y ago
I've been very happy with until now, though i must admit i'm using one node swarms. But i'd rather use that (1) than sticking together a custom solution using docker compose as i see it mentioned sometimes. (1) https:/&
175.
by raphinou 3y ago
I'm using Playwright [1] (dotnet version) to test my web app, and I mainly use XPath to identify elements on a page. I found it to be to the best choice in my use case, mainly because it is composable. I can define an XPAth to a table
176.
by raphinou 3y ago
NvChad[1]is the first vim/neovim config that worked for me for coding. What I also like in NvChad is that all my custom configs can be placed under a `custom` directory, leaving the provided config as is and easing upgrades of NvChad i
177.
by raphinou 3y ago
I think it shows in the community management that F# originated in a closed-source environment. For example, it is required to be a member of the F# Software Foundation to get access to F# Slack. Putting such a roadblock early in the discov
178.
by raphinou 4y ago
https://inl.info.ucl.ac.be/cnp3.html
179.
Help Us Sustain Open-Vsx.org(blogs.eclipse.org)
2 points by raphinou 4y ago|0 comments
180.
by raphinou 4y ago
In java I know of https://www.webtoolkit.eu/jwt/

More ›