Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
randyrand
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
At least, thats what we're told ;)
62.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
Source needs to be closed too practically speaking. But I bet AI is pretty good at analyzing binary too. Fix your bugs!
63.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
That’s really clever and quite funny!
64.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
> what do you actually want? A UI option would make sense. That is what most users are comfortable with.
65.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
Next: the back doors are written by the LLM!
66.
▲
by
randyrand
5mo ago
I can go long session with it making great code. But the first time I say “No, it should be …” it’s nearly game over. If you say it 3+ times in a row, you’re basically doomed. Sure, you can get it to fix the bug, but it comes at the cost of
67.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
That's the wrong framing. It's to protect yourself against unhinged people. Nearly every group of people has been persecuted at some point.
68.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Some would! But it changes the value proposition significantly. That's why it needs to be a reasonably high amount.
69.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
definitely. signal to noise on HN has always been incredibly higher than most other platforms.
70.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
I'm all ears if you have a better idea. Paying money for something valuable is not punishment. HN is easily worth the money to me.
71.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Personally, I think new accounts should cost $300. It’s not a perfect solution, clearly. But it should hopefully reduce the floodgates.
72.
▲
Ask HN: Can HN ban new accounts? or charge money?
24 points
by
randyrand
6mo ago
|
57 comments
73.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Normally this solved with an employment contract: "Anything you write, the copyright is transferred to your employer"
74.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
If you cant beat them join them
75.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Okay, so buy a new phone I guess that is yours?
76.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Eventually we will arrive at the correct conclusion: humans are not intelligent.
77.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
But the human needs to be sustained regardless.
78.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Otherwise, you'd be doored during passenger drop-off.
79.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
These are the same reasons I have an EUC. Extreme portability.
80.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
tangent: Can someone implement a way to run iOS apps on linux?
81.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
They bought options.
82.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Signed images don’t get you much. You can just hardwire the image sensor to a computer and sign raw pixels.
83.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
The attack vector basically requires a stolen iPhone. If instead the card itself is stolen, I can understand why they think this exploit is low priority. It’s the same security model people already expect. Physical card = anyone can use it
84.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Sounds like you were sexually harassed and then fired.
85.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
It’s pretty hard to hide warships these days. Imagery satellites with resolution good enough to track a ship capture every location on earth several times a day.
86.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
“You Aren’t Gonna Need It” - one of the most important software principles. Wait until you actually need it.
87.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
jj sounds awesome. I think I’ll give it a shot. But I found this article a bit long winded and ended up asking an LLM about it instead.
88.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Anyone blindly following LLM outputs its incredibly stupid.
89.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
Then I think you misunderstood the question! I’d expect the HN crowd / programmers to know the importance of limiting scope.
90.
▲
by
randyrand
6mo ago
The question is not limited to modern society! Or even humanity! Just “ever”. I mean what does the universe even look like in hundreds of millions of years? Humans won’t even be around.
More ›