randomNumber7

5 ms·

91.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
I had to go to the draft office in that time and behaved so badly that they didn't want to take me. Also at that time only some people had to go to the draft, because they had not the capacity to take everyone. That made it likely easy
92.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
But if you look at serious polls then not many young people will actually fight for this. I remember reading a number of around 15%... And those probably don't have a high IQ.
93.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
> I am wondering if the affected men will demand preferential treatment as a consequence of service. I'm more thinking about leaving asap.
94.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Why not just leave for another more sane country before that happens? It's for sure what I will do.
95.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Even if you draft women a men can not shit a child.
96.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Because we saw what men do in the last thousand years and if women would be in charge everything would be like the paradise /S
97.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
I think it's misleading to credit what is happening in germany to feminism. It's a very toxic ideology and the best thing is to leave if you are discriminated by this (e.g. as young white heterosexual male).
98.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
The population is very diverse about this I would say. Some people would stand at a red light as pedestrians until they starve to death while others don't give a fuck about anything.
99.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Every law is just words unless there is a power that can enforce it.
100.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
You can now simply change the gender in your passport as a german, so practically it would be very easy to get around this. But it is very easy to see from this all that some people are very vocal about equality when in reality they want pr
101.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Dogfights are illegal because it is cruel to let the dogs fight to death. It's s.th. different when events happen anyways and you just place bets on them.
102.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
They spend 2 billion $ on a rocket and can't get a proper camera team? Which then accidentially cuts away the most critical part? Occam's razor checks out...
103.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
No problem. I can explain it to you. > The probability that they accidentially missed the booster separation is very low. > There is also a clear incentive to cut away in case it fails. This is called the "premise" in logic.
104.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
I kind of predicted this a long time ago. They way germany is currently run they will need to act like the DDR and force their people to stay. Otherwise everyone with good education will leave.
105.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
They likely can't separate that with their spaghetti code.
106.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
The probability that they accidentially missed the booster separation is very low. There is also a clear incentive to cut away in case it fails.
107.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
SpaceX can also reuse their rockets by landing them backwards.
108.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Why do they need to convince low IQ people?
109.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
And the different re-entry profile has more velocity and temperature stress. So if their reasoning is wrong (that the failure was due to do lower pressure during the skip) it will very likely fail.
110.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
And the next flight will use a different design. I wonder why?
111.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
With humans on board? Even if they are not necessary for the actual mission?
112.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
You really have no argument except the appeal to authority.
113.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
I agree that its not rational, but it's also not boredom. Its simply stupidity and ignorance.
114.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
There was an interesting thread on HN yesterday about the safety of the heat shield. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47582043
115.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
You can always write lisp but most people can read code better that doesnt have that many (((()))))))
116.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
He is a bit offensive towards traditional academia that favors BNF and parser generators. It's been a while since a read it but I remember e.g. a rhetoric question (not exactly cited but by meaning): "Has anyone learned a programm
117.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
> I do have a suggestion for your app though: Have it compare your basket of goods across different markets in your region to show you the cheapest option. This is a great idea. I just think the use case is not that big since REWE is the
118.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
I can recommend anyone reading pratts original paper. Its written in a very cool and badass style. https://dl.acm.org/doi/epdf/10.1145/512927.512931
119.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
It's not for toy languages. Most big compilers use recursive descent parsing.
120.
by randomNumber7 6mo ago
Your reply proves me right.

More ›