random3

8 ms·

91.
by random3 5mo ago
This is more like the popular lay take that are more or less confused about the meaning and implications of the theorems. The fact is that the implications are real yet more nuanced than this - something the article touched on. Hilbert’s pr
92.
by random3 5mo ago
While that may be the case it’s hard to make this claim when: - Anthropic settled a similar case - Anna didn’t show up in court
93.
by random3 5mo ago
he'd probably be a great face for developer relations or whatever Antropic calls the role
94.
by random3 5mo ago
They gotta become a platform, so likely more will come
95.
by random3 5mo ago
It seems a good idea to ban cheating, but how hard is it, especially in new reasoning/agents contexts to validate references? The deeper question is whether legitimate AI generated results are allowed or not? Test - In the extreme - t
96.
by random3 5mo ago
Obsidian doesn't just render markdown though. There's a ton of functionality on top of Markdown which makes switching to any other tool very hard in reality. This is further exacerbated once you start relying on plugins (which arg
97.
by random3 5mo ago
perhaps it's your IP/network. I'm not getting any of that
98.
by random3 5mo ago
If that would have been even remotely a possibility, wouldn’t have Intel (assuming this news is real and realistic) be the best option to do that?
99.
by random3 5mo ago
Since we don’t know the number of atoms, we’d need to let omega be a function, then deal with all the edge cases, rename omega with ∞ and..
100.
by random3 5mo ago
Veritasium has a nice video about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MiUHjLxm3V0 Obviously, there are a lot of reasons why. But it boils down to having the vision, the belief and the strength to follow through over many yea
101.
by random3 5mo ago
The whole take seems to be from the lens of immature software people that have never started or worked in a startup, or have had enough curiosity to learn that the code is not too relevant, especially at early YC stage.
102.
by random3 6mo ago
That how you got the taste for lollipops?
103.
by random3 6mo ago
Makes you think what’s the biggest concerns wrt Mythos — is it finding or fixing the vulnerabilities that’s scarier :))
104.
by random3 6mo ago
Check out https://www.canirun.ai/ (and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47363754 )
105.
by random3 6mo ago
(for everyone else) I know this sounds cynical, but it's just a "flashlight" at a lot of the reality that surrounds entire startup "ecosystems". Founders should be aware whether they want to choose the blue pill or
106.
by random3 6mo ago
You and your friend seem to make a dream team.
107.
by random3 6mo ago
I wish people would understand that extremist thinking is wrong and obtuse - just as it seems to most effective solution in your case it starts looking naive and damaging if you become the target just because you have a bad face or bad luck
108.
by random3 6mo ago
Fair point, but I can’t stop wondering whether the crux of the issue wasn’t the OS and the decisions that go back to iPhone or iPod. I can’t recall the details, but they tried to get MacOS to work and then decided to go with the alternative
109.
by random3 6mo ago
It’s unfortunately the case in 21st century in unexpected places with systemic issues and it can get worse — e.g. repeated surgeries under influence, etc.
110.
by random3 6mo ago
That is the article. There’s no article, just a rehash of the coastline paradox. All while missing most interesting parts. The Wikipedia article is a much better exposition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_parado
111.
by random3 6mo ago
how does Hermes compare to SOTA?
112.
by random3 6mo ago
how can you tell the difference between anything and anything?
113.
Russian cosmism, the older brother of Nick Land's accelerationism, transhumanism(en.wikipedia.org)
5 points by random3 6mo ago|0 comments
114.
by random3 6mo ago
It's the conclusion of the top-rated comment— 50 points, 2nd has 14 and the 3rd has 6 points out of 18 comments. What exactly is dingenius about it?
115.
by random3 6mo ago
Thanks! This summarizes it > Overall, the work lacks a self-consistent and transparent accounting of resources, making its central claims difficult to substantiate and leaving a strong sense of sensationalism and hype, rather than honest
116.
by random3 6mo ago
Yes, cancer, bateries and computing has seen impressive progress. Yet, in general the correlation between results "on paper" and results in practice is over a long period of time, if any. It doesn't mean that new results aren
117.
by random3 6mo ago
These papers are as relevant to engineering/product stage as every other "new battery" or "new cancer" treatment are at the moment. E.g. 4 days ago (same paper) https://www.reddit.com/r/scienc
118.
by random3 6mo ago
Making money is what companies are for. The rest are non-profits.
119.
by random3 6mo ago
The “do it first, apologize later” will be the general principle with anything. It’s going to be hard and futile to prove even if they don’t do it through ToS first. Amazon has one of the largest corporate training sets out there:)
120.
by random3 6mo ago
x86 going away wouldn't be surprising. Ignoring David Patterson was a mistake to begin with.

More ›