random3

17 ms·

421.
by random3 3y ago
Improved over that https://github.com/ahrm/sioyek/issues/1011
422.
by random3 3y ago
Sioyek seems awesome, especially vim inspired features. Too bad u (undo) doesn't work and there doesn't seem to be a way to undo. Am I missing something or is it laking it?
423.
by random3 3y ago
is it possible to point Zotero to a local dir with papers, or am I forced to import documents into it?
424.
by random3 3y ago
Genuinely curious to understand your line of reasoning. - Concretly what's the late-stage capitalism nightmare? How do you define it and what do you compare it against? - What do you define what PG is concretely telling kids and how th
425.
by random3 3y ago
One concern is that measures, out of the box, have issues in 3+ dimensions. Concretely due to paradoxes such as Banach-Tarski, that arise from the Zermelo Fraenkel (ZF) + Axiom of Choice (AC) = ZFC axiomatic formulation for set theory. Sinc
426.
by random3 3y ago
Are we talking about a capability or pricing benchmark?
427.
by random3 3y ago
that makes it even worse for saying 2 times "here's your chart" and the third one appologizing for not having the capability, when in fact is has it? Here you go https://imgur.com/a/MT04viM
428.
by random3 3y ago
Thank you! Quick feedback - lmsys will introduce bias because it lacks rendering support for things like [ x_2 = \frac{1}{2} \left( 1.5 + \frac{2}{1.5} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( 1.5 + \frac{4}{3} \right) = \frac{1}{2} \left( \frac{9}{6}
429.
by random3 3y ago
I'm curious about how the benchmark is done. I suspect it can be improved in order to represent user's / usability expectations. I gave Bard a go, after seeing Jeff Dean's tweet. It's just as frustrating as it was,
430.
by random3 3y ago
If you seek elightment, you seek truth. Look down towards foundations like physics, mathematics, logic and look back towards the past. It' smaybe check out the Computer History Museum. Read Feynman's (or about) books. "Surely
431.
by random3 3y ago
When it initially came out I thought it's amazing. The idea of immersive computing actually is, more than amazing, natural. And I think we're actually on the path towards that, maybe just not through Dynamicland directly. It seems
432.
by random3 3y ago
IEEE Spectrum has a fancy new look, clean nice, maybe fonts adjusted for people that don't like to wear their glasses. Overall good. However, the link highlighting with a red underline looks like a MS Word document with lots of typos o
433.
by random3 3y ago
only half remembered and had a vague feeling it's familiar. It's been a while. Realizing now BASIC is pretty weird.
434.
Verses claims AGI open letter to OpenAI to invoke their assist clause(verses.ai)
1 points by random3 3y ago|0 comments
435.
by random3 3y ago
Three charts are a rant, not a study, and slim to even point anything, let alone draw any conclusion.
436.
by random3 3y ago
So approximately a SQL standard (aggregation "tree-climb") combined with a non-standard (LIMIT) which prevents an error yield an unexpected behavior.
437.
by random3 3y ago
Amdahl's Law applies cleanly to human processes. Perhaps the most revealing example is the origin of "computer" as a human occupation and how scaling the compute process happened at Los Alamos https://ahf.nuclearm
438.
by random3 3y ago
Stop using "Stop using X" arguments, without offering an alternative.
439.
by random3 3y ago
Are the theories beyond axiom fundamentally different if axioms are changed, though? And if not, aren't then axioms merely props or placeholders for invariants?
440.
by random3 3y ago
Surprising how, today, some companies believe integration with your own product is a business model or even a lever
441.
by random3 3y ago
I think (neo)vim has many years ahead, but also think the market overlaps with vscode. I believe that, for the average users, defaults, including a default plugin marketplace makes most of the difference. It would be interesting to see som
442.
by random3 3y ago
You mean you don't follow random topics you don't understand or like? :)
443.
by random3 3y ago
I have a similar line of thinking. However I think it applies generally and that any "broker" (e.g. Amazon) that is not explicitely on your side will be in conflict of interest. The implications are actually deep and wide.
444.
by random3 3y ago
IMO it's bit ironic that people seek maximum diversity within a single platform without taking into account the effort to seek the diversity beyond that platform. There are online communities beyond X and, event within X you can just
445.
by random3 3y ago
Can someone provide some good context/resources on this?
446.
by random3 3y ago
That's a whole lotta text to say AGI would screw SaaS and still, IMO, misses the point completely in terms of the actual impact. What's defensible is BS in this model as the reality is it would push the overeall "system"
447.
by random3 3y ago
The devil is in the details. Presumably they run on zero-trust On one hand this was not a core product breach. On the other, every core product breach has an indirect non-core breach.
448.
by random3 3y ago
Maybe, but it would have surfaced regardless, either directly or through related things. While the transformer may evolve into the next thing, it's equaly likely the next evolution will be unrelated to transformer. Moreover while the t
449.
by random3 3y ago
You seem to make an assumption that the models will only land producers, and not consumers. Why? Asymmetrical compute power? The difference will likely be in size (amount of facts compressed) not capability / ability to detect bullshit
450.
by random3 3y ago
I'd replace "years" with "months". Perhaps the quality of the model can be independent of its content. Either by training or by pruning.

More ›