random314

8 ms·

301.
by random314 4y ago
> Then Base(10) 3 aka Base(2) 11 converted to Base(sqrt2) would be 101. But it is actually 1000.000001 I don't see how. As per the expansion definition in the article 101 = 2+0+1 = 3 1000.000001 = sqrt(8) + epsilon.
302.
by random314 4y ago
There are experiments in the opposite direction too if you are feeling really upset. The claims are not unproven and this was not a properly randomized experiment unlike the far more extensive one I cite below https://www.wbur.o
303.
by random314 4y ago
Einstein's speech in the Nobel ceremony was entirely about relativity, which had been accepted as fact since 1908 within the physics community. General relativity was immediately accepted as fact on being published. The same is true fo
304.
by random314 4y ago
Ask physics reddit might be better. But I have never engaged there. I am a physics novice too, but I am familiar with Electro magnetic field theory and special relativity. Any physics discussion on HN is bike shedding, if not outright wrong
305.
by random314 4y ago
How many bits of information was there in the prompt. If it is was a very small amount, this is mind blowing! Being trained off Steve's autobiography dampens how impressive this is, but the grammatical structure and flow of sentences i
306.
by random314 4y ago
Dude, you need to give up already.
307.
by random314 4y ago
None of the HN commentors have a background in theoretical physics. These are low quality bike shedding comments. The ny times article itself is of a much higher quality. The holographic principle has been established for decades now. HN is
308.
by random314 4y ago
Einstein's relativity was purely theoretical when it was accepted world wide based on abstract principles. So, your characterization of how modern physics works is completely wrong.
309.
by random314 4y ago
I am unfamiliar with Collins. However, looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Collins There is a whole section and separate article on her political positions. As an encyclopedic reference it looks like a prett
310.
by random314 4y ago
Where can I subscribe to your newsletter?
311.
by random314 4y ago
It is really frustrating that there are dozens of complaints about inaccuracies and awfulness of articles in wikipedia with none of the complainers able to provide a single example, there are 100s of comments with zero example articles at a
312.
by random314 4y ago
Once again, any articles with incorrect content that you can cite?
313.
by random314 4y ago
Have you tried Simple wikipedia? Also, wikipedia is a reference, not a textbook.
314.
by random314 4y ago
Also maths and science is "too nonsensical".
315.
by random314 4y ago
Are those pages inaccurate? Any examples?
316.
by random314 4y ago
Can you give examples of misleading articles? Are they political or nonpolitical?
317.
by random314 4y ago
> You may as well have said 'coprophagia'. I would reserve that term for your own behavior and comment which are virtually entirely false and incorrect. Your media has been serving you feces that you have been voraciously gulpi
318.
by random314 4y ago
What about loss of facial expressivity? I guess whispering to your neighbor works a lot better. And how is the whiteboarding experience?
319.
by random314 4y ago
> The defining feature of Communism is the State owns everything in a classless society. I invite you to consult any reference. The difference is not semantic; it is a completely different system. What you are talking about is not Commun
320.
by random314 4y ago
Alright my original comment is at -3 and flagged!
321.
by random314 4y ago
I have already stated that state communism does not exist anywhere. In any case, a communist state is supposed to be a utopian state that MIGHT eventually emerge. The defining feature of a communist collective is that workers own the means
322.
by random314 4y ago
I Completely missed that. TIL. "There was disagreement among labor unions at this time about when a holiday celebrating workers should be, with some advocating for continued emphasis of the September march-and-picnic date while others
323.
by random314 4y ago
This is a very weak argument and you know it. This really amounts to thought policing- if someone just happens to think that worker ownership should be more than it currently is - the FBI must be tipped off. I will leave the 1984 analogies
324.
by random314 4y ago
This is the magic of American propaganda that workers will lash out against you if you hint that, perhaps maybe, workers deserve a slightly bigger portion of the pie. Americans today have no idea why they celebrate labor day. It comes and g
325.
by random314 4y ago
If you tell me that you believe in democracy, does it make sense for me to accuse you of supporting the horrors perpetrated by USA in Vietnam, all of latin America and the middle east? Soviet union and CCP were never communist, they used th
326.
by random314 4y ago
If you tell me that you believe in democracy, does it make sense for me to accuse you of supporting the horrors perpetrated by USA in Vietnam, all of latin America and the middle east? Soviet union and CCP were never communist, they used th
327.
by random314 4y ago
Yes, believing that workers should own the means of production is the same as believing that Jews should be gassed to death.
328.
by random314 4y ago
What are the examples of ideological grift? I just found out about Kendi through this comment thread and a simple Google search didn't yield anything.
329.
by random314 4y ago
Good for you
330.
by random314 4y ago
And ads need algorithms

More ›