ramraj07

6 ms·

61.
by ramraj07 5mo ago
There is no true scientific discussion possible about the nature of consciousness. This is squarely in the realm of philosophy. I personally think its moot to discuss whether LLMs are conscious. If they are, then we have diluted the definit
62.
by ramraj07 5mo ago
For 1, the general thinking is that companies like these perform the job of abstracting the CLI complexity in their application while the harness presented to the llm can be independently as suave as needed for it.
63.
by ramraj07 5mo ago
No matter how smart you think you get, I personally dont trust the models in an environment where they can read the secrets one way or another, in any high volume production environment.
64.
by ramraj07 5mo ago
> It assumes the existence of a sandbox that is by definition ephemeral or "cattle-like". Why? Because the moment you use k8s, you have to assume that, apparently. Or so Im told by all the infrastructure people I speak with. Ge
65.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Not even close to the same thing though.
66.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Backing up multi terabyte production postgres databases is not merely cos playing ha ha
67.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
What exactly do I need to say further? My first comment was that "scientists today still don't understand correlation =/= causation" and the replies are all scientists who try to explain again how correlation can still m
68.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Wouldn't mind knowing how.
69.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Im not gonna try to correct you because its probably going to be futile, but I implore you to paste this thread into chatgpt and ask where you could be wrong in your logic. Correlation not causation is all the more important in a topic like
70.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
> Autopsies of brains of Alzheimer's patients were rife with amyloid Do you want think carefully about how this can possibly suggest this is a causal link? > People with mutations that caused amyloid got Alzheimer's earlie
71.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
There were no cointerarguments? There was a very simple counterargument: where was the causal data? If none exist why should I counter argue when you hadn't proven it to begin with.
72.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
https://www.asc.ox.ac.uk/people/245 perhaps you can take a look and decide?
73.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Did they finally enable full SIMD or keep insisting its okay not to have it?
74.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Curious idea (found your hn post) but cant figure out what the use case is..
75.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Its outrageous that no one pointed out git. Its the perfect example of this. I consider code version control a solved problem post git.
76.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Apparently the phrase cargo cult software engineering is not common anymore. Explains these things perfectly.
77.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Yep, spend 100 billion on what should have cost 1/50that cost, and send people up to the moon with rockets that we are still keeping our fingers crossed wont kill them tomorrow, and we have to congratulate them for dunking on some irre
78.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
The problem they solved isn't easy. But its not some insane technical breakthrough either. Literally add redundancy, thats the ask. They didnt invent quantum computing to solve the issue did they? Why dunk on sprints?
79.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
It got them to where they need to be to then worry about ECC. This is like the dudes who deploy their blog on kubernetes just in case it hits front page of new york times or something.
80.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
I take the opposite message from that line - out of touch teams working on something so over budget and so overdue, and so bureaucratic, and with such an insanely poor history of success, and they talk as if they have cured cancer. This is
81.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
As someone who's been trying to figure out the same problems in a marginally different situation, it is breathtaking to see the number of architectural decisions they have made and have also decided to discuss publicly. I would still n
82.
Scaling Managed Agents: Decoupling the brain from the hands(anthropic.com)
3 points by ramraj07 6mo ago|1 comments
83.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
I can anticipate this starting to happen: shoot into the sky, wait for flock drone to start coming in, then shoot it! Free target practice!
84.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
To rich people, the privacy attack isn't an issue. We already track their private jets, how is this any different?
85.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Im a libertarian at heart so cant argue too much with people's personal choices, but I can only say that given what I know can go wrong in even the best maintained lab, I wouldn't ever do what youre doing. Yes its all great today,
86.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Thats the point. If even such a sycophantic ai disagrees with your points you have a problem
87.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
So you agree that this whole topic is in a sliding scale of lunacy, youre just on the saner side a bit?
88.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Test what, exactly? Purity? LPS contamination? They cant test for every last picogram of material in it. Did they test for viral contamination? Even drug addicts heat up the thing they inject so theyre actually safer than you can ever be. D
89.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
Im sorry for your quality of life problems but calling doctors bad at statistics and then giving anecdotal evidence as proof has to start ringing some logical bells right? You dont even have to take our word. Use an LLM as judge. Paste your
90.
by ramraj07 6mo ago
You're applying US law. I dont think this passes muster on all Indian laws.

More ›