ramoz

34 ms·

421.
by ramoz 1y ago
Claude Code does have remote sandboxing, and it’s better & more enterprise ready than any of these alternatives. Can deploy as a github action right now. Tag it in any new issue, pr, etc. Future history will highlight Claude Code as the
422.
by ramoz 1y ago
o3 is a great oracle I use as well - in my dumb reddit/theater mode I mention that. I'm building integrations for both Claude Code and AMP! AMP also provides really important features of a harness that others haven't quite ca
423.
by ramoz 1y ago
It's how these models/their-harnesses (e.g. the Claude Code js program) are being trained together in the RL stages. I think the software is now a very important part of the training process. Which is why I think frontier labs are
424.
by ramoz 1y ago
for you or anyone else that wants this to be real - I would love to test a solution out with you.
425.
by ramoz 1y ago
It doesn't if the agent sits alongside users on their desktops. LLMs are being blocked by standard bot detection - and the use cases are very much the same. People want smarter bots for the same shitty use cases.
426.
There is only one agent in August 2025(backnotprop.substack.com)
3 points by ramoz 1y ago|0 comments
427.
by ramoz 1y ago
There is only one true agent in 2025, Claude Code. That said, Gemini is very powerful for it's quality long-context capabilities: https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1miweuv/comment/n...
428.
by ramoz 1y ago
AI literacy is abysmal. The UX pushed onto people is part of the problem. I don’t feel good about 4o conducting government work.
429.
by ramoz 1y ago
This is a solid enterprise strategy. Frontier labs are incentivized to start breaching these distribution paths. This will evolve into large scale "intelligent infra" plays.
430.
by ramoz 1y ago
Uncompetitive how, what task and Eval? Gemini is consistently the only model that can reason over long context in dynamic domains for me. Deep Think just did that reviewing an insane amount of Claude Code logs - for a meta analysis task of
431.
by ramoz 1y ago
Because they don't blatantly read people's prompts. They have a confidential inference architecture. They don't target and analyze specific user or organizations - that would be fairly nefarious. The only exception would be i
432.
by ramoz 1y ago
Nice, what model & on what hardware?
433.
by ramoz 1y ago
Ive walked 10k steps everyday the past week and produced more code in that period than most would over months. Using Claude Code (and vibetunnel over tailscale to my phone- that I speak instructions into). There is a breakthrough happening.
434.
by ramoz 1y ago
self discovery via primitives is what works well today. I never discouraged that, only discouraged MCP sensationalism. However, an agent that can see the screen and immediately click through whatever desired UI modality is immensely more ef
435.
by ramoz 1y ago
That makes no sense. MCP at best is a protocol transpilation at runtime. It is not redefining things like DB drivers or connections. And I did not say rest apis enable agents. Computer use tooling does. APIs and everything else that already
436.
by ramoz 1y ago
LLMs with tools* MCP isn’t inherently special. A Claude Code with Bash() tool can do nearly anything a MCP server will give you - much more efficiently. Computer Use agents are here and are only going to get better. The conversation shouldn
437.
by ramoz 1y ago
Can you explain what sucks about being on the prescriptions?
438.
by ramoz 1y ago
You don't solve the problem of being able to rely on the agent to call the MCP. Hooks into the agent's execution lifecycle seem more reliable for deterministic behavior and supervision.
439.
by ramoz 1y ago
Sorry, but you had a misleading experience with trash software (crew). Research Agent of all cases - the productionized high-value agent shipped to the masses by all providers. Hard disagree with most of the narrative. Dont start with model
440.
by ramoz 1y ago
Looks great without the backdrop-filter
441.
by ramoz 1y ago
I think you need to provide perspective on your experiences when you don't swim 3x a week. Over a valid period,say, ~3mo or so.
442.
by ramoz 1y ago
Missionaries https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zt7BPxHqbkU
443.
by ramoz 1y ago
FYI - It's rising to the top rn because it is also being flooded with false reporting as an adversary tactic.
444.
by ramoz 1y ago
I'm not sure the graph offers any clear advantage in the demonstrated use case. It's overhead in coding. The source is the doc. Raw text is as much of a fact as an abstracted data structure derived from that text (which is done by
445.
by ramoz 1y ago
Further context: > We’ve seen how Claude Code users have embraced slash commands to customize the CC agent loop. > As a reminder, slash commands let you store custom prompts as Markdown files and invoke them with /your-command. &
446.
Slash commands(docs.anthropic.com)
3 points by ramoz 1y ago|1 comments
447.
by ramoz 1y ago
Wdym Claude Code cloud? Like in a cloud env?
448.
by ramoz 1y ago
But you know just how powerful that middle bit is. An engineer will truly 10x with these, maybe greater. So will the unskilled but they will have diminishing returns over more usage.
449.
by ramoz 1y ago
If you do not know the software design, claude code will fail. If you know the software design, you can guide it toward success.
450.
by ramoz 1y ago
Claude Code is an agent, not an LLM. Literally this is software that was released 4mo ago. lol. 1y ago - No provider was training LLMs in an environment modeled for agentic behavior - ie in conjunction with software design of an integrated

More ›