rambojazz

56 ms·

631.
by rambojazz 9y ago
What did Disney do to bootstrap themselves?
632.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Is this free software? I wanted to build from source buy it seems like they only distribute binaries?
633.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Repo has no license.
634.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Just choose a free one [1], then share your code somewhere (github.com, notabug.org, your own website...) [1] https://tldrlegal.com/licenses/browse
635.
by rambojazz 9y ago
The [addon page]( https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/mytwocents/ ) says it's released under "Mozilla Public License, version 2.0", which is a free software license AFAIK. So... w
636.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Where is the code?
637.
by rambojazz 9y ago
What about the licensing terms of this OS, and the eventual blobs that can possibly come with it?
638.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Do these books come with a free license?
639.
by rambojazz 9y ago
On Firefox you can ask the browser to disable CSS, or even just to ignore any text color defined within CSS (thus using your browser defaults).
640.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Wrong title. These icons are not "free", they are merely "gratis with some strings attached".
641.
by rambojazz 9y ago
> you do not break interface for downstream users, no matter how wrongly you may think they are using the interface How does Linux manage to never break its API? For example in the event of a refactoring.
642.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Can this be self-hosted?
643.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Is there any demo (screenshot or video) somewhere?
644.
by rambojazz 9y ago
I didn't mean proof of Mozilla involvement with Cliqz. I meant proof that their system will not screw me.
645.
by rambojazz 9y ago
These are just promises and don't mean anything. If you want to be trusted, you need to offer proofs. I will never use your products, and I'll probably stop using Firefox too because I'm tired of all the shit they are pouring
646.
by rambojazz 9y ago
> Yes, I think you could do what you're suggesting (though I don't follow 100%). I was thinking of sharing a Git directory, directly from my computer instead of using any centralized provider such as GitHub/NotABug. > H
647.
by rambojazz 9y ago
> IPFS seems to me to be a bit over-engineered whereas dat is a lot more simple/low level I also love simpler things. I'd be curious to understand where is IPFS over-engineered and where is Dat better, instead.
648.
by rambojazz 9y ago
> For one, bittorrent doesn't allow you to update/add files in a dataset once you've shared the torrent. Dat does. Dat also has versioning built in. Could this be used as a "distributed archive" to store any kind
649.
by rambojazz 9y ago
It looks cool, but I don't completely understand what this is about. Is it a way to share files over a P2P network? Isn't this basically the same as Torrent or IPFS?
650.
by rambojazz 9y ago
Is this open source and can be self-hosted? If not, it's just another Disqus.
651.
by rambojazz 9y ago
An honorable mention to https://notabug.org that is a public instance of Gogs. I don't think there is any public instance of Gitea.