ramblerouser

12 ms·

61.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Do you know how many views Easter sermons get, or are you just assuming it's not much? I would be quite surprised if the youtube algorithm is looking at video editing style.
62.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Making something illegal means putting people in jail directly or if they refuse to cooperate. In many countries this is what happens to people with what you would consider poor recruiting practices. It's usually called something like
63.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Does "have an issue with it" mean "put people in jail for it"? Because thats what it sounds like you're getting at.
64.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Calling something a "tired and xenophobic trope" doesn't make it not true. On your second point, there's actually a strong argument to be made that it does. The more racially divided a region is, the more likely politics
65.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
I dont see how a low median return plays no role in total returns. If the median were higher surely the total would be higher no?
66.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
A big part of it is wage stagnation too. The average American hasnt had a meaningful raise since 1973, that's half a century. Not good. Growth of the labor supply and repeal of trade protections for industries that employ low-skill wor
67.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Sorry, why not? Shouldn't anyome have that right if urban living constraints don't get in the way?
68.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
>How does military might factor in? I don't think that sentence is grammatically correct. The study does a poor job of explaining why there are so many roads in Turkey and most of the middle east, and yet such little development the
69.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
I don't think you understand what a false dichotomy is. Yes. Training more doctors would mean having more doctors. But for any number of doctors trained, why not prefer to train people more likely to put their skills to good use for so
70.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
From the article in your comment: >“As far as we recall these are already public,” WikiLeaks wrote at the time. >In 2014, the BBC and other news outlets reported on the cache, which revealed details about Russian military and intellig
71.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Im asking you what term you think is appropriate. It seems like you dont think ANY word is appropriate, and that is 1984 newspeak. If your opponent isnt allowed to have a word to describe your position, they cant effectively argue against i
72.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Why is having more female doctors preferable to more medical services in total? This seems like sentimentality getting in the way of a functioning medical system. I suspect that many here denouncing the Japanese goal of improving their medi
73.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
How do you describe "international political entities overriding national sovereignty" without using the word "globalist" or "internationalist"? (Both of which are antisemitic apparently)
74.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
I don't think the original sources choosing what to leak counts as bias on the part of Wikileaks. As for them only acting to confirm leaks in a biased way, do you have any examples of leaks that were published elsewhere because wikilea
75.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
"Anti-anti-senitism" is not a fair characterization of the recent accusations in British politics. ((())) is clearly refering to the attempt by Zionists in th UK press to smear those in the Labour party who oppose Israeli human ri
76.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
No. The point of wikileaks is that they verify the authenticity of things they publish, and the veracity of past leaks gives credibility to future ones. Regarding accusations of bias, I have yet to see an example of authentic non-public inf
77.
by ramblerouser 8y ago
Interesting. What did you object to specifically?