Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ralusek
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
91.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
> since I only use AI for issues/problems I don't understand I only use [coding assistants] for problems I DO understand.
92.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
I woke up, didn't focus on self care, didn't take medication, and got fired immediately. That doesn't feel very realistic
93.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
I work on a kiosk (MedifriendRx) which, to some degree "replaces" pharmacists and pharmacy staff. The kiosk is placed inside of a clinic/hospital setting, and rather than driving to the pharmacy, you pick up your medications
94.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
I JUST had a very intense dream that there was a catastrophic event that set humanity back massively, to the point that the internet was nonexistent and our laptops suddenly became priceless. The first thought I had was absolutely hating my
95.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
> incoming president of Oxford Union > debated Kirk [at Oxford] > cheered assassination of Kirk, which happened within months of debate Is this really dragging American culture war into things? This is clearly relevant to Oxford
96.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
speedrun when?
97.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
If a robot costs $50k, lasts 5 years, and does the dishes and laundry every day, I'd consider it.
98.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Why should it be progressive if it's not even scarce there? Why are you trying to punish people unnecessarily?
99.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Definitely the case. That being said, I think it would be hard, at least in the immediate future, to translate the concept of difficulty to a universal LLM for a bespoke/specific game. I assume most game AIs are tuned by hand to feel f
100.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
The real jump was 3 to 3.5. 3.5 was the first “chatgpt.” I had tried gpt 3 and it was certainly interesting, but when they released 3.5 as ChatGPT, it was a monumental leap. 3.5 to 4 was also huge compared to what we see now, but 3.5 was re
101.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
It’s not obvious that the most profitable path for OpenAI would be saving on costs, it might be that the model is actually tuned to overthink because they can charge on those extra thinking tokens.
102.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
It's interesting, because I was always a bit confused and annoyed by the Giant's Drink/Mind Game that Ender plays in Ender's Game. It just always felt so different to how games I knew played, it felt odd that he would &q
103.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
They're not even in the same ballpark as the SOTA models, and they're not even in the same ballpark as the SOTA open source models, which was supposed to be their niche. But even if they were, it's not immediately clear how t
104.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
To play devil's advocate, I think there is some merit to their point. A common criticism against modern academia is that so much of the low hanging fruit has been addressed, that to be an expert working on the actual frontier means you
105.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Does anybody else have an issue with the like $8/user/month price point that products like this have coalesced around? I feel like a service like this should be like $1-5/user/year, at most.
106.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Speaking for myself: one reason would be because it's one of the things LLMs/tools like Codex are the most useful for. When I have a smallish application, with tests, written in one language, letting an LLM convert those files i
107.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
> The benefit of choosing a dodecahedron is that it is the platonic solid with the lowest vertex curvature, and by this measure it is the most spherical of all the platonic solids. This is key for minimizing cell distortion as the proces
108.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Google manages tech debt by throwing away products after a couple of years
109.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
Isn’t 2.5 pro significantly cheaper?
110.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
> If you've done nothing wrong, you have nothing to hide Ok but in not hiding anything, we all apparently do a lot "wrong."
111.
▲
by
ralusek
1y ago
I'm a gardening and landscaping enjoyer, but I am constantly confused about the bordering magical thinking surrounding dirt, among other aspects of growing things. If you look at hydroponics/aeroponics, plants basically need water
112.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
A world of slop increases the demand for products that help you discern.
113.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
Are Democrats constantly in violation of the constitution, and openly hostile to the first amendment? Yes. Does that make any of this acceptable? No. And a good deal of this is even more concerning.
114.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
Best models for search, in order: OpenAI Deep Research Grok Deep Search Gemini Deep Research Grok + Search Gemini + Search ChatGPT + Search These are just my opinions, but I do use this feature all the time. Haven't used Claude enough
115.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
I thought we stopped -ly company names ~8 years ago?
116.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
It kind of doesn't matter if this is the best choice or not. If Elon wants to occupy the position he does in the government, he needs to remove his companies from the pool of government contracts. I like DOGE's stated objectives.
117.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
Point is that phones and computers are constantly getting software updates, in which many bugs are patched. We don't get headlines announcing that the phones are being recalled.
118.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
Every Finnish word is precious
119.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
I'm extremely sympathetic to the objectives of DOGE, and still find this all to be some of the most unsettling behavior I've ever seen. I was somewhat relieved to hear Musk and Trump say yesterday that they intended to comply with
120.
▲
by
ralusek
2y ago
I tweet occasionally even though I have like 10 followers, of which none have ever responded, basically as an exercise for self accountability. I want to be able to look back on what I said at particular moments in time and know what I thou
More ›