ralegh

5 ms·

31.
by ralegh 2y ago
I agree it's a bit of a pipe dream. I'm more thinking of performance here, e.g. web services using Django. You could start off in dynamic/interpreted land and have a seamless transition to performant compiled land. Also lets
32.
by ralegh 2y ago
Great! Something I've always wanted. I'd love to be able to use a bit more type-y Go such as Borgo, and have a Pythonesque dynamic scripting language that latches onto it effortlessly. Dynamic typing is great for exploratory work,
33.
by ralegh 2y ago
Wow totally forgot that… but wouldn’t it be (10^23)^3 = 10^69!?
34.
by ralegh 2y ago
For a second I thought we'd seen a lot of the universe, the HDF being 1/5th the radius away and on googling Earandel is 2/3rds the radius... of the known universe. "According to the theory of cosmic inflation initially i
35.
by ralegh 2y ago
Ironic that this has been downvoted a bunch
36.
by ralegh 3y ago
Huge potential, it's annoying in a way that gets me to keep playing but maybe slightly too annoying- I have a couple suggestions that would change the gameplay a lot so feel free to ignore: Attacks that lose when they are exactly 1 let
37.
by ralegh 3y ago
Yeah I'd agree, we learn addition/multiplication/etc as processes of smaller problems. If you gave an LLM a prompting framework to do addition I'm sure the results would be better (add the units, add the tens, Food for t
38.
by ralegh 3y ago
GPT?
39.
by ralegh 3y ago
I'd assume it's more about redundancy - 1/18 failed motors vs 1/4 would be much safer to land. Also means the replacement motors would be cheaper (individually). Like the starship booster.