Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rakoo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
181.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Apparently what stops it from wide adoption is people commenting on Mastodon while not knowing it. If you want to curate your timeline you use lists; one I use is "those accounts who rarely post and I want to see it all"
182.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Capitalism isn't about standards of livings, it's about exploitation of the majority by and for a minority, whether you give the exploited shackles or golden shoes.
183.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Ran some stats on my mails of the last 4 years, here are the daily characteristics: N = 24k Min = 1 Max = 211 Median = 11 Avg = 16.023907 Stddev = 18.312062 A lot of them are actually chat messages through DeltaChat so not representative of
184.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
The windows registry is more a unified configuration file for the whole system, I think what GP talked about is more about a general store for data
185.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> Search is a very different story, you wouldn't want to have to do a full directory scan for text based search. So some level of indexing would be useful for a client mail service. While notmuch and mu exist, I myself use the mblaz
186.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Thanks for the comparison ! I see there are some advances compared to recutils, those would benefit being put to the front !
187.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
If your research has added value over the existing state of the art I would love to read more about it !
188.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
I'm not sure the paper-like presentation of the article shows that the author was in pure discovery mode, eager to share something new and interesting. My message is an echo to earlier comments of earlier posts that talked about a simi
189.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Is this a serious article ? The state of the art of knowledge ? There are at least two (2) existing prior art implementation that have done this for years, only better (as in, with better tools): - recutils: https://www.gnu.org&#
190.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> In this case, openai says they got a voice actor though so I'm not sure if IP applies here The effect of the DMCA on youtube has shown that IP seems to apply even if something vaguely looks or sounds like the original. "Apply
191.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> If I was super rich I'd rather put my money in my own charities where I can control how the money is managed and where it goes spoiler alert: this is already what is happening. You don't get and remain rich by putting your mo
192.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> But I also have a hard time believing they went thru this careful process of voice selection and it never occurred to them that the voice sounded like her, and didn't think about the legal repercussions You do know the whole modus
193.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Maybe that's the root of the problem. Making technological toys for fun is absolutely ok, but when we pretend to solve people's problems we should probably take a look at old ideas first
194.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> I join the sibling commenter in saying "PLEASE, NO MORE IDEAS WE HAVE ENOUGH". Funnily enough, that was my comment :) I agree with you if email is enough, and I tend to believe it is enough for much more than we use it for.
195.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Being cheap and easy is not a problem, quite the contrary. That we as a society make this a good thing for spam is a problem, but I don't want to make the system shittier just because of the bad use of it.
196.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> If email didn't need fixing, spam wouldn't exist. Spam is not a technical problem, it's a societal problem. As usual the tech reflex is to find a technical solution but it is mistaken, once again. Societal proplems requi
197.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Totanly agreed. We as a profession do not learn what existed before, only what the latest are doing and it's tiring. We value creating instead of reusing and maintaining, as seen in the extreme in the evaluation process at Google. We h
198.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
That popup is not the half-height YOUR PRIVACY IS IMPORTANT TO US blocker, it's a banner at the bottom. Totally different (but still worth a block from my side if possible)
199.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
You don't need to ask if the information you collect is necessary for your site to work.
200.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
2nd-gen email exists in the form of xmpp. Reuse HTML constructs if you dare ( https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0071.html ) or use simpler, safer markup ( https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0393.html ). Si
201.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
I like them, it's a sign that the website is shit and helps me go away from it.
202.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
The pop-up is not part of the law. The law says user should be aware and able to do informed changes, not that they should be annoyed. That part is entirely on companies
203.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
It checks for the license header that developers should put in the served file. It does some exceptions for trivial code
204.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
It is code, so it is the most flexible that can exist. You can call the code with an application that includes it, you can make your own server with your own API although that isn't really useful if the server is going to be local anyw
205.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
> think it would makes much more sense, to have a dedicated project which is focusing on just collecting the data and have a community to maintain updates. Then all those frontends could connect to whatever API this would offer. It alrea
206.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Isn't that better isolation though ? A memory corruption will at worse break the OS which is the app and nothing else. Push the model further and you can have one unikernel per user and reduce even further the consequences of bugs
207.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
GNU licenses don't mandate for the source code to be sent all te time. It only says that it must be available upon request, and the author must give pointers to get it (an url to download content or inspect it, an email to ask, ...)
208.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
And how do we propose we catch the rabbit without chasing it then
209.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Not an expert here, what is alpha ?
210.
▲
by
rakoo
2y ago
Because saying "AES" is enough to talk about encryption ? Nothing else is involved ? Because if we're going in this direction everyone should just use XORs for encrypting and everything would be fine, and the rest would be im
More ›