rakoo

7 ms·

31.
by rakoo 1y ago
According to the post above, if you earned enough reputation then you might be given that one-hour window for fixing before disclosing. The issue isn't so much about whether or not there should be a "private" window but how l
32.
by rakoo 1y ago
I was talking about comments on a discussion board.
33.
by rakoo 1y ago
elevates* Language has meaning, and the puplic domain is a better situation for society. It is more interesting to say it ascended
34.
by rakoo 1y ago
Piracy is only bad if you want to earn money for each eye watching a minute of a movie. What we're doing right now is piracy, no one pays anyone anything for content The question shouldn't be about how much it costs but why do thi
35.
by rakoo 1y ago
Which is also way way easier to do than all the existing solutions: create a folder on the computer, add the computer to the phone, share the folder with the phone. Anything you want to share goes in the folder.
36.
by rakoo 1y ago
There's no formal standard, but I keep seeing this complaint from people who just haven't installed syncthing. At this point it's not inexistence but mere ignorance
37.
by rakoo 1y ago
Alternatively, your write doesn't have to be fire-and-forget: downstream datastores can also write to kafka (this time fire-and-forget) and the initial client can wait for that event to acknowledge the initial write
38.
by rakoo 2y ago
Individual freedom doesn't exist in a vacuum, it is only effective if collective freedom is aimed and enforced. Having the freedom to live under a roof at the condition that you have enough money isn't something I'd conside
39.
by rakoo 2y ago
I've always learned that "speed" is something that can be used to describe an object aka something with mass. When something without mass travels (basically information) you use "celerity", because it's not tal
40.
by rakoo 2y ago
Or stop defending individually and start attacking collectively ? This is an issue on scrapers side, they have to fix it > make following robots.txt a legal requirement Even better: make them publish their IP addresses so we know what to
41.
by rakoo 2y ago
You should really try the thing in question before commenting
42.
by rakoo 2y ago
If your device is confiscated your entire history is in the clear. Forward secrecy doesn't magically solve problems, it's useful if you use ephemeral messages. In DC if there's a window of time where you want messages to not
43.
by rakoo 2y ago
The age of write-only programs is back, perl is relevant again
44.
by rakoo 2y ago
If a peer doesn't respond quickly enough they can be disconnected from and marked as bad. Even if they had good intentions their latency might be too high and it's good to disconnect from them. Check out this very nice link from a
45.
by rakoo 2y ago
If the torrent is already well-seeded it's ok, a 1567th seed won't make a difference so don't bother with them. It's the less seeded torrents where you can put some efforts and do something good.
46.
by rakoo 2y ago
A single node distributing everything "because it's fast" isn't really the architecture that bittorrent is aiming for, and I don't think it's one we should be aiming for. Try downloading any well distributed to
47.
by rakoo 2y ago
Sufficiently evolved torrent clients follow a tit-for-tat protocol: - If you're nice with me I'll be nice with you - If you're mean with me I'll be mean with you This is the best answer for the Prisoner's dilemma (
48.
by rakoo 2y ago
Take time with the people to do the boring stuff on their phone/computer: - install [the thing] - start it, show how it works - search for yourself, start a convo, exchange messages - add them to the group IME the friction comes from h
49.
by rakoo 2y ago
Ok I'm curious: since this strategy sacrifices consistency, has anyone thoughts about something that is not full fan-out on reads or on writes ? Let's imagine something like this: instead of writing to every user's timeline,
50.
by rakoo 2y ago
Irrelevant. The point is that there shouldn't be a single archive for anything, because then it has the longevity of the operators. Who can say whether Harvard or the IA will close its service first? Why choose ?
51.
by rakoo 2y ago
Ok but you can say the sace thing about deepseek: maybe it says what it says because of the training data
52.
by rakoo 2y ago
This is for cases where the server in the middle can't ssh into the target server
53.
by rakoo 2y ago
The whole point of capitalism is for a minority with the means to profit off of the majority without the means. It doesn't care about the quality of products as long sa they make money. Since owning all the means of production means ow
54.
by rakoo 2y ago
Capitalism. We should call it out loud and clear where ever we see it. Don't buy from for-profit entities, or soon there will be no non-for-profit entities.
55.
by rakoo 2y ago
And some will say the exact opposite: contrary to what would seem obvious, code is primarily meant to be read by humans, then written by humans. Because you'll spend way more time unfucking code than actually spitting it.
56.
by rakoo 2y ago
Surely there's a step between self-hosting on your home computer and colocating a server you buy Surely a $15 per year vm would be enough to receive a few thousands POSTs per day ( https://tinykvm.com/ ), or if that&#x27
57.
by rakoo 2y ago
Aws lambdas and sqs are not
58.
by rakoo 2y ago
That's why websub (formerly pubsubhubbub) was created and should be the proper solution, not a proprietary middleware
59.
by rakoo 2y ago
> You have someone else to point the SOC2/HIPAA/etc auditors at. I would assume you still need to point auditors to your software in any case
60.
by rakoo 2y ago
sfeed ( https://codemadness.org/sfeed-simple-feed-parser.html ) has basic infrastructure to do that

More ›