rakoo

1250 ms·

3151.
by rakoo 13y ago
> copyright violation I tend to be on the opinion that all forms of art are in the public domain by default, unless explicitely stated. So, there would be no breach of copyright here. However, there is a clear breach on privacy rights, a
3152.
by rakoo 13y ago
He didn't say Moore was less villain. He's saying Moore is not the only one to blame, and that can be understood: would you accept being fired because your boss saw a picture of you having a tennis game ? would you accept if it wa
3153.
by rakoo 13y ago
>Why I stopped [perfectly fine activity]... and why you should too
3154.
by rakoo 13y ago
This is supposed to be compatible with all Ice Cream Sandwich phones and iPhones, rather than only one model. This looks great, I can't wait to see some real footage.
3155.
by rakoo 13y ago
> > It also is significantly easier to trace than current financial systems > No it isn't. He's talking about following a bitcoin's life from wallet to wallet, not about impersonating a wallet. The whole bitcoin prin
3156.
by rakoo 13y ago
That money is gone forever. It is your money, you are responsible for it. No one will be able to "give your money back", because you didn't give your money to anyone. If you fear you might lose your password, back it up. Stor
3157.
by rakoo 13y ago
Perspectives/Convergence really is a great system, but it unfortunately still has several problems: - it completely leaks your browsing history: you basically ask a notary "what's the certificate you see for kinkyneighbors.co
3158.
by rakoo 13y ago
> and you have to trust them to some extend anyway, because they are responsible for the name servers So this is not solving the problem, this is moving it elsewhere.
3159.
by rakoo 13y ago
> that means you pay for your internet connection and for the hardware you run the website on. Why is also paying for a certificate a problem? Because the internet access and the hardware would have been bought regardless of the activity
3160.
by rakoo 13y ago
Microsoft officials went on to recommend that customers stop using SHA1 now and begin using certificates based on SHA2, which is much more resistant to collision attacks. If SHA1 is broken at the algorithm level, one must _not
3161.
by rakoo 13y ago
> All other data would be filtered electronically, without reaching any human eye Well, of course, they are to be trusted.