Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
rak00n
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
61.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
They pay on the same par as other big techs. See https://www.levels.fyi/SE/Amazon/Google/Facebook
62.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Also you may not end up in one of those "cool" projects either even if you land on a FANG job.
63.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Ok, that makes sense.
64.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
That's an odd analogy knowing USA went into a bloody civil war to fix that. You're comparing a broken system with an older and even more broken system that we already fixed and trying to find merit in current broken system by that
65.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Does that mean he'll keep getting wiser as he lives more lives?
66.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Problem with your approach is in order to make sure your made up problem isn't banned you have to go through all the banned question everytime you ask your question. That's a lot of unnecessary toil.
67.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
On the other hand software engineering job in US pays a lot so you can do a (relatively) quicker home run to financial independence if you don't fall into consumerism.
68.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
If you don't have any pool, how do you track banned question? How do you know your question isn't already banned?
69.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
HTC only added 2k employees. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/ryanwhitwa...
70.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Why didn't Microsoft partake in any of these ideas then? Smartphone came out 8 years later in 2007.
71.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
You're defining success in non-scalable terms. Sure, not everyone can be millionaire but what if just being "financially solvent" is considered a success? What if maximizing financially solvent people is a definition of succe
72.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
There is a black mirror episode very similar to that blackmailing.
73.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Wait, no source code?
74.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
I'm surprised at the quality of the article. I didn't realize Huffington Post can publish things like this.
75.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
I learned something new. A broker can sell your stock without your consent?
76.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
The other offer of giving travel reward seems too good to be true too.
77.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
Another way to see it is we're interested in what you were saying and we're giving you the podium.
78.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
What did you do in that year off? I'm feeling like I'm pretty close to a burn out and I'm not sure how to deal with it.
79.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
What I described is the same thing in layman's term. Worst case is the colloquial word for upper bound. And in that example n was approaching 1000. If you want to be puritan the only fault I see in my definition is instead of using a g
80.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
If a country's birthrate is low and it needs immigrants to fill in the gap in workforce that low birthrate is creating, it's essentially replacing those people over time. Since your German I'd urge you to read the book Strang
81.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
It's interesting you mentioned Harari because he mentioned Google when describing #2.
82.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
How so? https://www.khanacademy.org/computing/computer-science/algor...
83.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
How's that a feature when you're replacing your relatively highly educated set of people who assimilate culturally with people from poorer countries with lesser education and who don't culturally assimilate? Of course it'
84.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
I have seen it getting used in many places and it's understood as order of. O(n) means at worst case number of steps needed to complete an algorithm would be c.n + a. So it is completely valid use since O(1000) would mean it can be c.1
85.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
I think that saying is only true when you know that company and its prospects very well. The question to ask here is will Facebook continue to be the ad-money tree it is right now?
86.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
You have to increase your metabolism somehow. Either through exercise or weightlifting. It won't be easy and it will take time but it's not entirely impossible.
87.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
How about existing residents who rent in CA cities? Your argument doesn't stand.
88.
▲
by
rak00n
8y ago
For what? The man is happy doing his things. Who are you to judge him?
89.
▲
by
rak00n
9y ago
You're almost trolling. We're on the edge of defining what's good and bad.
90.
▲
by
rak00n
9y ago
I wonder if Project Fi has a good spam detecting system. I don't remember when I last got a spam call.
More ›