raincole

32 ms·

751.
by raincole 7mo ago
Of course not. It's a framework of a framework of a framework, unilaterally suggested by Iran.
752.
by raincole 7mo ago
I agree. The AI witch hunting has made people abandoned em-dashes. It also made me abandoned listing. At this point it will make us abandoned any structural writing in a few years.
753.
by raincole 7mo ago
And OpenAI's influence is hugely exaggerated compared to, say, Google.
754.
by raincole 7mo ago
> I wanted to say I appreciate the depth of thinking & care that went into this. The irony lol. The whole ticket is just AI-generated. But Anthropic employees have to say this because saying otherwise will admit AI doesn't have
755.
by raincole 7mo ago
This is the most AI-generated thing I've seen this year, and I was only one fifth into it before I bounced. Not saying this problem doesn't exist, but if the model is so bad for complex tasks how can we take a ticket written by it
756.
by raincole 7mo ago
Yet, somehow Major League had been selling tickets just fine for more than a century without smartphones.
757.
by raincole 7mo ago
More than one million of young people have been sent to the front line and Russia and Ukraine haven't collapse. But somehow Trump posting memes will collapse the US.
758.
by raincole 7mo ago
Which one? If you mean Iran, "100s of" seems like a weird understatement.
759.
by raincole 7mo ago
They physically moved 300 tons of gold from the US to Germany during 2013~2017. I think actions weight more than words.
760.
by raincole 7mo ago
If you're a retail business that sells RAM then yes, this is the way. If you're a fund that holds RAM in some indirect manner (like you hold hypothetical RAM futures) then it depends on whether your country's laws ask for mar
761.
by raincole 7mo ago
If you buy $100,000 of RAM and just hoard them, and a shortage happens, you won't update their value according to their market price, until you sell them. That's it. It has nothing to do with whether your RAM is stored in New York
762.
by raincole 7mo ago
This is highly unpopular... on HN. Which heuristically implies it's popular in the real world.
763.
by raincole 7mo ago
The funny thing is that Joel Spolsky predicted most of it 20 years ago[0]: >> Jon Udell found a slide from Microsoft labelled “How Do I Pick Between Windows Forms and Avalon?” and asks, “Why do I have to pick between Windows Forms and
764.
by raincole 7mo ago
> I never understood.NET's purpose. What problem it exactly went out to solve? Java. Java is the problem .NET attempted to solve.
765.
by raincole 7mo ago
The reasoning is to be consistent with C and it's more than enough reasoning for me. I don't know if 1-based indexing is fundamentally better. However, I know the probability that I will need to use other languages in the future i
766.
by raincole 7mo ago
For all the reasons, but the 1-based index alone makes me uncomfortable.
767.
by raincole 7mo ago
Even 們 was used in Journey to The West all the time . I really don't know where the author got the idea that plural suffix is something from English. Perhaps this whole article is AI-generated.
768.
by raincole 7mo ago
As far as I know only the latest (unstable) version uses SDL3.
769.
by raincole 7mo ago
Luxun's works and opinions are far, far less well known in Taiwan than in the mainland.
770.
by raincole 7mo ago
Btw, Love2D is based on SDL2. If you hate Lua but needs the same cross-platform capabilities, you can use an SDL2 binding in other languages or make your own.
771.
by raincole 7mo ago
> The constant use of “I” (Wo) is a modern invention; classical poetry usually omits the subject to create a universal feeling. 我(Wo, "I") has been constantly used for a very very long time. Just less in poetry. For example, th
772.
by raincole 7mo ago
> Traditional Chinese relies on context: “Rain heavy, not go”, “雨大，不去了”. > Modern Chinese demands explicit logic: “Because the rain is heavy, therefore I will not go.””因为雨下得很大，所以我决定不去了。” No, what? Most native speakers today definitely
773.
by raincole 7mo ago
To increase table turnover rate for the restaurant.
774.
by raincole 7mo ago
Usage meter has always been completely opaque anyway. They could (and probably did) shrink the limit whenever they like.
775.
by raincole 7mo ago
Yes. > This format replaces average per-message estimates with a direct mapping between token usage and credits. It's to replace the opaque, per-message calculation, not the subscription plan.
776.
by raincole 7mo ago
When it comes to LLM you really cannot draw conclusions from first principles like this. Yes, it sounds reasonable. And things in reality aren't always reasonable. Benchmark or nothing.
777.
by raincole 7mo ago
I'm quite sure in every passing second people are pumping more AI slop to the internet. I just don't see why this is something special (unless it's a well-known project among HN users that I'm not aware of.)
778.
by raincole 7mo ago
Serious question: What is this post about and why should we care? It's a repo with 35 stars. Is adding 12,000 posts in a single commit somehow technically difficult or significant?
779.
by raincole 7mo ago
At the end the book is published.
780.
by raincole 7mo ago
> LLMs don't care about files They do. I highly suggest not try to derive LLMs' behaviors (in your mind) from first principles, but actually use them.

More ›