raincole

20 ms·

511.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yes, this is the exact harmful idea that I was talking about. If this were true than there would be no 'reader mode' in browser. Or the reader mode would not modify the html at all. What you see in reader mode is the content layer
512.
by raincole 5mo ago
I think the (misuse of) so-called "separation of concerns" has been the most harmful thing that happened in web front end development. HTML can CSS are the same kind of concerns: the presentation layer. The idea that HTML is purel
513.
by raincole 5mo ago
If Hiroshima were the only big public nuclear plant around the world, then yes, the aftermath of Hiroshima would provide strong evidence either for or against nuclear power.
514.
by raincole 5mo ago
^ this account commented this last month: > Now Claude is writing great commit messages but since I'm no longer looking at code - I never see them. Let it be a learning opportunity for us, folks. This is why you shouldnt take commen
515.
by raincole 5mo ago
Because "the next generation is ruined" is always a popular sentiment. It has been with us for at least two thousand years, and it surely won't go away in our lifetime. When this AI era's devs grow older they'll com
516.
by raincole 5mo ago
It has always been like this. We actually know that the model performance has been mostly steady[0], but you cannot beat the notion of "evil companies secretly serving us worse models." The meme value is too strong. [0]: https:
517.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yeah, but in a professional setting, one's work is for someone else to review. We programmers have code review. Even very established authors have editors. I think it's wisdom instead of a weakness to admit your work needs reviews
518.
by raincole 5mo ago
> what the University is going to look like in 10 years Mostly like they look like now, probably. With slightly more strictly enforced rules around exam. I fail to see why it won't be like that.
519.
by raincole 5mo ago
You should've turned the sarcasm detector on.
520.
by raincole 5mo ago
> I just caught myself about to copy and paste it into Claude to see what it thinks because I'm worried that it doesn't make sense or it reads funny or there's something missing I unironically believe this is a very good h
521.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yeah. Everyone seems to forget that making memory was considered a bad business just a decade ago.
522.
by raincole 5mo ago
Depending on what an average user looks like in your mind. For me openclaw is the opposite of a tool designed for an average user. ChatGPT/Claude's web ui is much more like something for average user, tbh.
523.
by raincole 5mo ago
Political parties and foreign actors, eventually. Propaganda pieces are usually free to access.
524.
by raincole 5mo ago
It's really hard to comprehend how this comment is relevant to the original article or my comment. It seems that you didn't read the whole article, the whole paragraph, nor the whole sentence you quoted. You only read one single p
525.
by raincole 5mo ago
>> American technology companies bid workers away from haircutting and waiting tables to write code. > What? The context is clear is you read the whole paragraph instead of that one sentence: > Once a good is non-tradable, the w
526.
by raincole 5mo ago
I think we're going to witness a very inefficient system getting brought to work by policies alone. And I'm not even bashing EU. The closest example still working today is probably the US's Jones Act.
527.
by raincole 5mo ago
> My reaction to the first demo (recipe) is that it was slower than typing the same thing on your keyboard. For you and me, who have used keyboard in our lives for more than 1,000 or even 10,000 hours. There was a brief period when typin
528.
by raincole 5mo ago
> The very first thing they show this new machine doing is helping people shop for clothes using AI. No one is doing that, these people don't exist. Lol. You're really out of touch, aren't you. That being said, I don&#x2
529.
by raincole 5mo ago
Which is why it failed though. It turns out people won't pay one dollar to read an article like "If AI writes your code, why use Python?" The situation is very unfortunate. We had perhaps once-in-a-lifetime chance to solve mi
530.
by raincole 5mo ago
Ok, so what's the solution? I do agree with your comment. But obviously Cloudflare didn't invent DDoS. If Cloudflare just magically disappears tomorrow, the AI crawlers won't stop. So what's the alternative? It's no
531.
by raincole 5mo ago
I wonder what it means for Slang[0]. Presumably the point is that people want to do GPU programming with a more modern language. But now you can just use Rust... (Disclaimer: I like Slang a lot.) [0]: https://shader-slang.org&#x2
532.
by raincole 5mo ago
Because it's a very strange way to view the economics. Yes, AI uses energy. But using energy itself isn't an inherently bad thing. It'll also incentive people to invest more in renewable energy too. > Additionally, many re
533.
by raincole 5mo ago
But isn't phone number verification usually works like... Google sends you a SMS, not the other way around?
534.
by raincole 5mo ago
> The leader of a product/company does not have to read code. Yeah, because they believe (sometimes wrongly) their subordinates read it. > Understanding of code never existed from the business perspective. It does, it's call
535.
by raincole 5mo ago
The "people" in your hypothetical story have been wrong the whole time. The correct attitude is: When AI can complete lines, you still have to read and understand the code. When AI can complete whole functions, you still have to r
536.
by raincole 5mo ago
What dispute? The parent comment says that Obsidian is not usable without plugins and it's simply nonsense. It would be very charitable to call this a "dispute." Could Obsidian handle plugin permission better? I guess so. But
537.
by raincole 5mo ago
> Right now, the vast majority of users are being bombarded with a one sided narrative of how 'insecure' their devices are. They read almost everyday about someone losing their life's savings due to 'hackers'. In
538.
by raincole 5mo ago
> Obsidian is not a usable system without community plugins. It's horse hockey. Plenty users use the vanilla Obsidian. > Folks will reply "but I use it every day without plugins". Because they do. You're saying tha
539.
by raincole 5mo ago
You think Apple doesn't want you to use local models? That's an interesting way to view the world. I mean, utterly stupid as it is, but interesting. But the previous sentence is even stupider (a Perl script 10 years ago could w
540.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yeah, we know how the economy would look like if the society considers business failures "scandals."

More ›