raincole

15 ms·

451.
by raincole 5mo ago
Wow... what happened to Fortune? I thought they're far above this kind of clickbait.
452.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yeah, cool theory, but they are selling at a loss. We know that because their model is open and available on other providers too. No other provider even sells a quantitized version of DeepSeek V4 Pro at that price. Also, in case of LLM, m
453.
by raincole 5mo ago
First of all, the whole website is based on what the CEOs said they're going to spend. Not the actual money spent. So there is no real 'data' presented here or to contradict. Second, even if you take CEOs' words at fac
454.
by raincole 5mo ago
Now use common accounting standard and amortize the cost. Oh it doesn't fit the narrative. Never mind then.
455.
by raincole 5mo ago
In other words, PG is so rich now that he forgets the existence of less fortunate citizens.
456.
by raincole 5mo ago
They're selling at a loss (obviously). But why not? Gaining market share at a loss isn't the US's patent.
457.
by raincole 5mo ago
^Sorry for this understatement. DeepSeek is actually selling tokens at a far cheaper price than my previous comment implied. DeepSeek V4 Pro price on OpenRouter: deepseek: $0.435 / $0.87 baidu/fp8: $1.521 / $3.042 novita&#x2F
458.
by raincole 5mo ago
Renters will always pay one way or another. You can name it wealth tax or property tax or house tax. It doesn't matter -- the result will be higher rent.
459.
by raincole 5mo ago
Humans work like that too. If you're not comfortable with Claude involves in every step (for whatever reason) then just use different providers for each.
460.
by raincole 5mo ago
DeepSeek is very likely selling tokens at a loss. There're many cloud providers that provide you with DeepSeek V4 Pro via API, and those services at least twice as expensive as DeepSeek itself.
461.
by raincole 5mo ago
All the major coding agents already support DeepSeek.
462.
by raincole 5mo ago
Yes, building rockets costs money and is bad for environments.
463.
by raincole 5mo ago
The whole point of having canary builds is that they're unstable. That's why they're called canary. Rockets failing in test flights isn't a bad thing.
464.
by raincole 5mo ago
No one says that? Of course Bun rewrite is political. And if you deprecate Bun support due to they did something political, obviously this decision itself is political too.
465.
by raincole 5mo ago
> outside of a few large cities Yeah and this is the exact reason why people call the US car-centric. Only in the US the large cities are car-centric too. You just proved the parent comment's point. > They came for a single rea
466.
by raincole 5mo ago
I mean, yeah, if you made a non-interoperable internet2, no one would use that, and therefore no marketer would use that too. In this sense this article is 100% correct.
467.
by raincole 5mo ago
What you described is the internet. The 'inter-' prefix means that.
468.
by raincole 5mo ago
The question is how to distribute X in this situation, and I (mistakenly) trusted the reader's intelligence to infer that.
469.
by raincole 5mo ago
The fact there are more people want X than the total number of X.
470.
by raincole 5mo ago
I agree with the libertarians on this. Scalping isn't an issue. People who are willing to pay more for tickets should get them. Concert tickets are not basic needs like housing or food. If there is room for arbitrage (which is what sca
471.
by raincole 5mo ago
I guess you're intentionally proving the parent comment's point?
472.
by raincole 5mo ago
> In this person's communication culture And it's a bad culture. Yes, there are good and bad cultures. Cultural relativism has its limitations.
473.
by raincole 5mo ago
If you actually watched Jobs you would know it has very little to do with how Apple was actually created in real life. Of course a movie about Steve Jobs is inherently more marketable than one about Qian Xuesen. But one isn't inheren
474.
by raincole 5mo ago
People though asking LLM to output the reasoning steps was astrology until it's standardized and made ubiquitous.
475.
by raincole 5mo ago
The gap between novel result and "new math" is as wide as the pacific ocean.
476.
by raincole 5mo ago
But I want redditor's comments. It's almost my only use case of google now. What I'm complaining about is that google search can't even summary the right reddit comments.
477.
by raincole 5mo ago
I don't know if it's Google AB-testing something, but the summaries below usual search result entries (the non-AI ones) are unbelievably bad today. Sometimes the link is a Reddit or SO post, but the summary is from a reply/an
478.
by raincole 5mo ago
> That's mostly because a movie about someone who's an expert at building organizations is boring. Still issue (seriously). He might be an expert at building organizations in real life, but there is no rule that a movie about h
479.
by raincole 5mo ago
PhDs code like that too. Especially if they're statisticians :)
480.
by raincole 5mo ago
I like how everyone laughed when OpenAI said their models will have "PhD-Level Intelligence" and now the goalpost has been moved to if AI can create new math (i.e., not PhD-Level, but Leibniz/Euler/Galois level.)

More ›