raggi

8 ms·

61.
by raggi 7mo ago
That certainly probably would have reduced the noise.
62.
by raggi 7mo ago
LGPL applies to the LGPL’d code, not to every piece of code someone might add to the repository or under the same name implicitly. The claim being made is that because some prior implementation was licensed one way, all other implementation
63.
by raggi 7mo ago
Look, forget the details, step back and consider the implications of the principle. Someone should not be able to write a semi-common core utility, provide it as a public good, abandon it for over a decade, and yet continue to hold the rest
64.
by raggi 7mo ago
It’s not a good idea and that’s where I’d really start with the dated commentary here rather than focusing on the polling mechanism. It depends on the application but if the buffers are large (>=64kb) such as a common TCP workload then u
65.
by raggi 7mo ago
The human driver of the project has a comment that is reporting that the project has no structural overlap as analyzed by a plagarism analysis tool. Were comments excluded from that analysis? Is your comment here based on the data in the re
66.
by raggi 7mo ago
nope. Someones going to leak important private data using something like this. Consider: "I got a bug report from this user: ... bunch of user PII ..." The LLM will do the right thing with the code, the developer reviewed the code
67.
by raggi 7mo ago
> You can already configure your initial congestion window, and if you are connecting to a system expecting the use of PQ encryption, you should set your initial congestion window to be large enough for the certificate; doing otherwise i
68.
Syzkaller AI agentic framework and MCP server(groups.google.com)
1 points by raggi 8mo ago|0 comments
69.
by raggi 8mo ago
This problem space is not small enough to stay within current LLM attention span. A sufficiently good agent setup might be able to help maintain docs somewhat through changes, but organizing them in an approachable way covering all the heur
70.
by raggi 8mo ago
It's difficult for us to maintain documentation of exactly the kind you'd want there, though we do try to keep up with docs as best we can. In particular there is a fairly wide array of heuristics in the client to adapt to the env
71.
by raggi 8mo ago
Which CEO?
72.
Deobfuscation and Analysis of Ring-1.io(back.engineering)
57 points by raggi 8mo ago|25 comments
73.
by raggi 8mo ago
nothing is actually stopping people from understanding systemd-init except a constant poorly justified flame war. it's better documented than pretty much everything that came before it.
74.
by raggi 8mo ago
he is counting every c file in the systemd _repository_ which houses multiple projects, libraries and daemons. he equates that to the c file count for a single init. it's a disingenuous comparison. systemd-init is a small slice of the
75.
by raggi 8mo ago
hurd init is a lot like systemd architecturally, it just gets to use kernel provided ipc rather than having to manage its own. if your objection to systemd is its architecture you don't want anything to do with hurd.
76.
by raggi 8mo ago
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/tree/main/src/core doesn't look like 1678 C files to me.
77.
by raggi 8mo ago
The drivers are already done, they're in the Android build. I just want a more open OS. I don't mind if it requires running a vendor signed boot, kernel and driver chain, I'd be using those same vendor chains anyway for non u
78.
by raggi 8mo ago
Please talk to your congresspeople about getting DRM abolished, in the meantime, please don't try to deny my freedom to consume legally obtained content that is only available with DRM.
79.
by raggi 8mo ago
I love my shield, it’s been a staple. If they wanted to really knock it out the park, the next step would be a steamos port with DRM support.
80.
by raggi 9mo ago
Been wanting this ever since doing it in Fuchsia. Really excited to see added focus and investment in this for the Linux ecosystem.
81.
by raggi 9mo ago
> I'd just cloned a copy of Chromium myself, and for all that time and money, independent developers who cloned the repo reported that the codebase is very far from a functional browser. Recent commits do not compile cleanly, GitHub
82.
by raggi 9mo ago
there are a loooot of languages/compilers for which the most wall-time expensive operation in compilation or loading is stat(2) searching for files
83.
by raggi 9mo ago
Unless you leave your ssh agent on, then it very much does.
84.
by raggi 9mo ago
> I am working on a high-performance game that runs over ssh. WAT. Please no.
85.
by raggi 9mo ago
Yep. Observability stacks are a similar blind alley to containers: They solve a handful of defined problems and immediately fall down on their own KPI's around events handled/prevented in-place, efficiency, easier to use than what
86.
by raggi 9mo ago
Just merged https://github.com/tailscale/tailscale/pull/18333
87.
by raggi 9mo ago
At runtime rather than install time yes. I did some prototyping on this back in the day, one of the issues is the language lacks an efficient data structure to store that information and you can’t (easily) build one efficiently because inst
88.
by raggi 9mo ago
What I would do to really squeeze the rest out in pure ruby (bear in mind I’ve been away about a decade so there _might be_ new bits but nothing meaningful as far as I know): Use a cheaper to parse index format (the gists I wrote years ago
89.
by raggi 9mo ago
It’s definitely possible, I wrote a prototype many many years ago https://ra66i.org/tmp/how_gems_should_be.mov
90.
by raggi 10mo ago
I don't want the observability of my applications to be bound by themselves, it's kind of a real pain. I'm all for microvm images without excess dependencies, but coupling the kernel and diagnostic tools to rapidly developing

More ›