raganesh

9 ms·

31.
by raganesh 14y ago
You are the founder of evolup.com. Let us say your product/service becomes a huge success. Seeing your success, existing social games developers want to do the same. Which action from those existing developers would be best for users? a) Do
32.
XKCD What If: Robot Apocalypse(what-if.xkcd.com)
22 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
33.
Android’s US Market Share Declined By 5% In Q2: Strategy Analytics(techcrunch.com)
2 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
34.
Mountain Lion(daringfireball.net)
97 points by raganesh 14y ago|28 comments
35.
What If? - A Mole of Moles(what-if.xkcd.com)
6 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
36.
by raganesh 14y ago
As long as CSS opacity is not explicitly specified for any SVG element, I have found FF is not very slower than Chrome/Safari. But the moment opacity attribute is added even for a single element (even if the value is specified as 1), FF rea
37.
by raganesh 14y ago
Has SVG not been around a lot longer than HTML5? The article says "This is a HTML5 tag to draw a vector graphics" And pretty sophisticated JS libraries have been built to make use of this technology in web applications. The best IMHO is d3.
38.
by raganesh 14y ago
"I actually agree with Google. On that note, I think their search algorithms have become essential for the industry. As much as I've tried switching to Bing or Yahoo, I keep coming back to Google's engine. Those algorithms should be de fact
39.
Judge tells Apple how to rework its patent exhaustion case against Motorola(fosspatents.com)
2 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
40.
by raganesh 14y ago
"All eligible products" - in terms of product categories that EPEAT covers. EPEAT registry does not yet include certifications for smartphones or tablets.
41.
by raganesh 14y ago
Maybe once in a while, people just want to appreciate a visionary like Elon Musk. No critique or judging, just appreciation. Why does it have to be a "Personality Cult" or "Reality Distortion Field"?
42.
by raganesh 14y ago
True visionary. Lucky for the rest of us, he has the determination & financial muscle to make his visions a reality.
43.
Greenpeace Boosts Apple’s Grades From F’s and D’s to … D’s and C’s(wired.com)
1 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
44.
Congress to discuss sales bans if key patents infringed(reuters.com)
1 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
45.
by raganesh 14y ago
To quote from the article: "The letter to municipal agencies will cite a 2007 policy that mandates that city funds only be used to purchase EPEAT-certified desktops, laptops and monitors..." Later on: "...the EPEAT registry does not yet inc
46.
FTC set to hand Google record $22.5m fine over Safari privacy breach(thenextweb.com)
3 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
47.
by raganesh 14y ago
>who appear to be quickly running to the Nexus 7 Citation please? Has it even started shipping yet? Google is still talking orders, right?
48.
by raganesh 14y ago
I guess this post by MG Seigler is relevant here: http://parislemon.com/post/15604811641/why-i-hate-android Before anyone makes any Ad Hominem comment, may I please request to focus on the point in that post relevant to the thread here?
49.
Get angry at Apple over Galaxy Nexus ban, but get angrier at Google(imore.com)
9 points by raganesh 14y ago|3 comments
50.
by raganesh 14y ago
Demographic info may not be the only thing they know about. Given a lot of sites embed some sort of Facebook widget on their pages, they have a tracking mechanism. If I had not explicitly signed-out of Facebook before visiting all these oth
51.
by raganesh 14y ago
That article is about a law suit involving motorola; not a license agreement MS has with several companies including Samsung & HTC. What about these other Android companies that have got license agreements with Microsoft? They have neve
52.
by raganesh 14y ago
>>the patent that Microsoft is suing OEM's with is related to ActiveSync Can you provide citation for the above? As far as I know, neither Microsoft nor any of the Android H/W manufacturers have revealed any details on which patents
53.
What’s next for RIM?(mondaynote.com)
1 points by raganesh 14y ago|0 comments
54.
by raganesh 14y ago
Apple should pay. No questions about that. But how much should they pay? In this special case of patents, Motorola is expected to charge Apple the same rates as other licensees. In fact, they have committed to do so. But now, they are going
55.
by raganesh 14y ago
In case of Motorola vs. Apple, it was Motorola that sued Apple first. See this thread: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4184714
56.
by raganesh 14y ago
What I believe is besides the point. And the attempt by Motorola to pre-empt is the Author's point of view, not mine. Why could it not be the other way around? Maybe Apple was preparing in secret, fearing a law suit by Motorola. That is equ
57.
by raganesh 14y ago
Let's talk about that in context. Motorola contributed some patents to a mobile telecom standard; they made a commitment to license these standard essential patents in Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory terms to everyone who wants to b
58.
by raganesh 14y ago
Same blog, earlier article: http://www.fosspatents.com/2010/12/apple-vs-motorola-now-42-... Motorola filed the first suit. Even in the article you have linked, the author says "...why my position is that Apple attacked Motorola even thoug
59.
by raganesh 14y ago
Okay. Let me qualify my point. I find it hard to believe such a high profile bribery can happen in the US (the article you have posted is a case of bribery by an American company in Mexico). And given Apple's profile and a lot of entities a
60.
by raganesh 14y ago
If you are accusing her of bribery, that is a very serious allegation. Imagine if such a thing happens and is eventually exposed. What a scandal would it be. I don't think any large company, let alone Apple, would want to be involved in any

More ›