rafiki6

40 ms·

391.
by rafiki6 10y ago
As with other professions, we can always create a "professional degree" that follows the standard 4 year degree. Similar to how medicine and law behave. Or how you basically have to spend the equivalent of a year studying to recei
392.
by rafiki6 10y ago
Really? Yet it seems that the "standard" CS101 interview is still pretty much the same. Unless you're talking strictly about credentialing for a specific language or framework which I would agree would be stupid. Also, as wit
393.
by rafiki6 10y ago
Good
394.
by rafiki6 10y ago
The discussion I'm reading is absurd. Why has no one suggested a credential yet? Every other profession has it. It's insanely inefficient for our industry to behave like this. Software development and engineering is mature. We nee
395.
by rafiki6 10y ago
What's that?
396.
by rafiki6 10y ago
I think the electoral college is probably the worst approach. The original intention behind the electoral college was basically to overturn the decision of the people if the wealthy elite didn't like it. That's translated into &qu
397.
by rafiki6 10y ago
With all due respect I don't even think America has a "one man one vote system" in practice. The idea of super pacs and an easily manipulated populace combined with a bipartisan political system seems to me like America is li
398.
by rafiki6 10y ago
You made the incorrect assumption that voting is an inalienable right. By who's standard? We've lived most of our history without the right to vote and survival of the fittest was the way humanity and nature functioned (I.e. the s
399.
by rafiki6 10y ago
Trump thinks he's still on the apprentice...doesn't like a news outlet, "You're fired!"
400.
by rafiki6 10y ago
I'm not sure why you jumped to conclusion of subjugating them. Have you heard of epistocracy? Give people a chance to participate but make them earn it. I don't believe voting is a right. When my decisions affect the lives of othe
401.
by rafiki6 10y ago
America always seems to rely on industrialists to move it's country forward. What qualifies Mark Zuckerburg to be a trust source on anything but building an ad platform? Get your shit together America, it's time to change up the w
402.
by rafiki6 10y ago
answer is actually easy, execution is complicated...clearly too many people don't have the required IQ to participate in their own governance, as such maybe it's time to prevent them from doing so
403.
by rafiki6 10y ago
I don't run interviewing.io, so in all honesty I have no idea what they are doing to fix it. But hopefully they do fix it.
404.
by rafiki6 10y ago
Neither choice is valid. Software development interviewing is broken. We are starting to finally collect data to prove this. https://blog.interviewing.io/technical-interview-performance... Humans are bad at evaluating candi
405.
by rafiki6 10y ago
Not seeing how decentralization offers any of the perceived advantages the author mentions. Frankly, I'm curious if he's just following the trend du jour of attaching blockchain to anything to make it sound innovative. The current
406.
by rafiki6 11y ago
I share a lot of the author's sentiments and frankly a lot of the tech interviews I've had were terrible and I've also been on the other side of the table and made great hiring decisions based on conversations about past expe
407.
Ask HN: I do terrible in algorithm questions in interviews
8 points by rafiki6 11y ago|3 comments