Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
radlad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
11 ms
·
151.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
This is a non-sequitor.
152.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Yes - that's what happened. I mean minus the part where Pretti "started an altercation" with them. He has back to the agents when they start pepper spraying him in the face and then tackle him to the ground. But they heard &q
153.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
That's actually not quite what FMV is: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fairmarketvalue.asp > Fair market value (FMV) is similar to market value, which is the price that the asset would trade for in t
154.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
I assume OP meant something closer to "fair market value" than "fair vs. unfair." Tesla is not priced according to its underlying assets or technical analysis (e.g. P/E ratio), but solely based on hype/sentimen
155.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
> The people who disliked the Islamization of the country and had the financial means to do so left while the people who were fine with it stayed. You say it yourself, the ones who "had the financial means to do so left" - so i
156.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
I just played Cyberpunk 2077 and it's been feeling pretty real.
157.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Watch the video - he's very clear that he's not looking at code. I see no indication that he is being hyperbolic.
158.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
In a recent Yegge interview, he mentions that he often throws away the entire codebase and starts from scratch rather than try to get LLMs to refactor their code for architecture.
159.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
My partner is a radiologist and I'd love to hear more about what you built. The engineer in me is also curious how much this cost in credits?
160.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
After listening to Yegge's interview, I'm not sure this is accurate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuJyJP517Uw For example, he makes a comment to the effect that anyone using an IDE to look at code in 2026 is a
161.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Bring back Pingback! But seriously, Mastodon, etc. are cool, but there's gotta be a way we can augment RSS to get most of what we want?
162.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Nope, it's the default behavior of a typical firewall. NAT rewrites packets but it never drops packets. An un-rewritten packet may fail to route (i.e. "destination unknown".) But that depends on the destination in the packe
163.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
This is because most consumer routers have a firewall, which is separate from the NAT. Creating NAT mappings also creates firewall entries. Otherwise, the router would happily pass the packet along to any IP address it finds in a packet i
164.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Yes, physical tapping of lines / ISP attacks were outside of the threat vector I was discussing. At this point, I think any discussion of NAT starts to look a little orthogonal.
165.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
A default deny firewall is a good idea to protect services everywhere in your network, including those which run on the router itself (e.g. many routers run a local DNS server.) Without NAT, packets are not dropped, they simply do not have
166.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
> Against highly determined malicious actors you will of course want a proper firewall, but for 99% of people, NAT is enough to keep from being bothered by run of the mill malicious actors. Maybe, maybe not, but regardless 99% of people
167.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
NAT is not a firewall: all it does is rewrite packets, it does not drop them.
168.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
That's a great point - the packet is not dropped by the firewall as a result of NAT - but it still won't route anywhere because the IP in the packet is that of the router itself. I've updated the article as a result of your c
169.
▲
IPv6 is not insecure because it lacks a NAT
(johnmaguire.me)
316 points
by
radlad
9mo ago
|
577 comments
170.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
> the NAT-by-default of IPv4 IPv4 is not NAT-by-default. The reality of the world we live in today is that most home networks have a NAT, because you need multiple devices behind a single IP. That said, I agree: it's quite unknowabl
171.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
> I've slept with my watch for a while (stopped because the battery is crap and I need to charge it every day or it won't last past noon the next day) and I've had the same adjustment period. I'm guessing this is an A
172.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Reading the article, it actually doesn't. Many US-made drones are also banned.
173.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
In case any Kagi product owners come across this, this comment received 30 upvotes, so this seems to be a fairly common sentiment among HN users.
174.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
The First Amendment right exists in large part to enable and encourage non-governmental news reporting - to avoid a world in which government officials can dictate "reality" or "truth." The Guardian is actually a British
175.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
I'm currently using LibreWolf on desktop and Firefox on Android.
176.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
I think there is a very large difference between citizen activism (i.e. boycotts which can lead to resignations) and government authoritarianism. I have no problem with people exercising their right to free speech - including both Brandon E
177.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
As a Kagi user for years now, I am very interested in a Firefox/Chrome competitor but I will absolutely not use Orion until it is open source.
178.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Brandon Eich resigned.
179.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
This pretty much sounds like my dream vibe coding dashboard - basically a personal Github populated by AI agents I can assign tasks to. Does this exist yet? Or can something like gitea be setup to behave this way?
180.
▲
by
radlad
9mo ago
Regardless of this particular situation, many figures of speech don't have an actual basis in science. I wouldn't take this as gospel.
More ›