radlad

30 ms·

541.
by radlad 2y ago
That's what an identity provider (e.g. AD, OneLogin, Okta, Duo SSO, Google OAuth, etc.) is supposed to be, ostensibly.
542.
by radlad 2y ago
> This is of course hideously inefficient as you scale larger, but that is not the question posed. It's not just inefficient, you literally can't scale larger. Mirroring is all that RAID 1 allows for. To scale, you'd have
543.
by radlad 2y ago
This is a misunderstanding of the problem. See my comment downthread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42701912 "hd" is Google's solution to this problem, and "hd" is also the source of this vul
544.
by radlad 2y ago
How can you achieve 2-disk fault tolerance using btrfs and RAID 1?
545.
by radlad 2y ago
Traditionally, SAML / OIDC trust is established using public/private keypairs. Each IdP/SP pair gets a unique combination. In this case, a domain changing hands would not allow the new owner to gain access to the old owner&#x
546.
by radlad 2y ago
I hear this sentiment all the time. But as a kid, I first rode a bike with training wheels. The day my dad removed them, I went outside before him, hopped on the bike, and just started riding. There was no "learning to balance" or
547.
by radlad 2y ago
The hinge allows you to peel in both directions (i.e. forwards and backwards across your potato/carrot/etc. without lifting the peeler.) It also means it can track a rough surface more easily. I haven't had any issues with th
548.
by radlad 2y ago
This is a bit of a random place to mention it, but while I very much like OXO goods, IKEA makes the best (in my opinion) potato peeler for $5 - cheaper than anything OXO makes: https://www.ikea.com/us/en/p/ike
549.
by radlad 2y ago
this is why I use arch btw
550.
by radlad 2y ago
I think the point is that one can only devote a finite amount of time and energy searching for a job each day before they hit diminishing returns, due to both mental fatigue and physical limitations. Though as another commenter pointed out,
551.
by radlad 2y ago
Dows it auto start at boot?
552.
by radlad 2y ago
There is already conflict in his life at this point. The question is how best to resolve it. The school is in a position of authority and is telling the student that after spending tens of thousands of dollars at his school, he can't r
553.
by radlad 2y ago
Wonderful read, thanks for sharing!
554.
by radlad 2y ago
> And secondly... Are the second vacation homes really the problem? I'd guess the problem begins around 3rd or 5th, not the second one, which is a fairly common and usually also a good thing to have - for both the owner and the soci
555.
by radlad 2y ago
LFS is about building a Linux distribution from scratch (i.e. using the Linux kernel.) The book in question is about how to build your own operating system (i.e. a non-Linux) kernel from scratch. > We'll implement basic context swit
556.
by radlad 2y ago
More than a shared password?
557.
by radlad 2y ago
The links are one-time use so you need to take this into account anyway or users simply can't login. It's usually done with a required button click after following the magic link. Or you can try JavaScript techniques to detect a r
558.
by radlad 2y ago
> And yet, it's also unclear if any other course of action would help. Despite decades of pleading, the trolls never starve no matter how little they're fed. Downvotes that hide posts below a certain threshold have always seeme
559.
by radlad 2y ago
Have a family member who works as an assistant at a dealership and they are often pressured into buying a newer car for this reason.
560.
by radlad 2y ago
1P will support it in a standards-compliant way soon: https://blog.1password.com/fido-alliance-import-export-passk... KeePassXC also supports export but not yet using the aforementioned standard: https://github.c
561.
by radlad 2y ago
A huge amount of physician / provider time (cost) is dedicated to insurer billing, coding, and documentation.
562.
by radlad 2y ago
That's certainly true, but I think it's also true that you have more contextual information about the trustworthiness of what you're reading when you pick up a book, magazine, or load a website. As a simple example, LLMs will
563.
by radlad 2y ago
> So are you saying, some gen Z men are in a relationship, but don't know it? Or, you know, are leading women on.
564.
by radlad 2y ago
Fascinating - I'm from Michigan, and I would say "y'all" sounds more casual to my ears than "you guys." Formal speaking (in contrast to casual speaking) often eschews contractions.
565.
by radlad 2y ago
I maintain that the sentence shows no disrespect to my Midwestern sensibilities. It's considered common courtesy to ask someone how their day is going, and I don't consider "you guys" to be a sign of disrespect. In fact,
566.
by radlad 2y ago
"Fiance/fiancee" is not a middle-ground, it means you have proposed and your partner has agreed to marriage. There are plenty of couples who may as well be married, but choose not to participate in that social construct. Your
567.
by radlad 2y ago
I wonder why you find the term "partner" insufferable? As a Midwesterner comfortable with "you guys," I refer to my partner as my partner because it feels far more appropriate after dating for 7 years than "girlfrie
568.
by radlad 2y ago
I'd hardly call Red Lobster formal. "Red Lobster Hospitality, LLC is an American casual dining restaurant chain," according to Wikipedia.
569.
by radlad 2y ago
I am another Midwesterner who has largely switched from "you guys" to "y'all" (nit: ya'll is not considered correct spelling) after some lengthy and heated Slack discussions between Midwesterners and West Coast
570.
by radlad 2y ago
Right. The only time I sometimes leave a commented out line of code is if it's temporarily broken and will be uncommented soon; or if it's by-far the most obvious way to do something, but does not work for some reason, and then th

More ›