Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
radlad
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
361.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
Au contraire, FOSS allows you to fork and make modifications.
362.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
Added to Git in 2019: https://github.com/git/git/commit/209f0755934a0c9b448408f9b7... Supported on Github in 2022: https://github.blog/changelog/2022-03-24-ignore-commits-in-t...
363.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
No, but he sure is entertaining!
364.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
Coincidentally, Nathan Fielder is currently doing an entire season of The Rehearsal based on the premise that a number of flight crashes occurred after the co-pilot failed to contradict or take controls from the pilot. > Nathan Fielder s
365.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I missed that Uber sold off ATG in 2020: https://www.reuters.com/article/world/uber-sells-atg-self-dr...
366.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I haven't dug into these, so apologies for the naive question, but for a multi-tenant service like WordPress.com, can you effectively limit which WordPress blogs can WebMention you? If the allowlist is formed on the domain, this seems
367.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
So self-hosting refers to hosting the hardware, not the software? Does a colocated dedi count?
368.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I think we might have a fundamental disagreement that we'll have to agree to disagree on. From a brief search, Facebook and Google are responsible for ~60-80% or more of digital advertising spend. This is because of their data-driven a
369.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I think the document you really want to look at is this one, which is the actual regulation the DMA is operating under: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/1925/oj/eng That regulation is very muc
370.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
The problem with Chrome and the DMA has to do with the fact that Alphabet does these "don'ts": - treat services and products offered by the gatekeeper itself more favourably in ranking than similar services or products offere
371.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
My mistake. While Booking.com is HQ'd in Amsterdam, Booking Holdings is indeed a US company (also responsible for Priceline, Kayak, and OpenTable.) > There are zero European companies, including Spotify - the #1 music streaming mark
372.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
That's not really true. You can easily switch to Deezer, Apple Music, Tidal, Qobuz, YouTube Music, etc. You'll have access to just about the exact same library of music. You can't just ignore YouTube, TikTok, Facebook Marketp
373.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
Isn't the question whether they were set because they were US companies, or because they are dominant gatekeepers on the Internet? 5/7 designated gatekeepers are US companies: https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu&
374.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
Is this typical in Europe? If so, that sounds great. Years ago I heard from British friends that it was more expensive and slower. Like the United States, Europe is a big place!
375.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I don't know, where do you draw the line? If I host it myself using nginx running on a VPS, does that count? Or still no, because I don't own the VPS? What if it's a dedicated machine, colocated? What if it's at home, bu
376.
▲
by
radlad
1y ago
I agree with your overall comment, but I think this is basically what OP was getting at: it's not surprising that Gruber is against EU/DMA interference, yet even he has issues with this particular point.
377.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
I don't recall Buzz or Wave having the Circles feature that many (including myself) miss from Google+.
378.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
The word "hate" itself also offers a lot of room for interpretation.
379.
▲
Valkey to replace Redis in the [extra] Repository
(archlinux.org)
6 points
by
radlad
2y ago
|
0 comments
380.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
> internet speed/cost in much of America is insane compared to Europe Can you expand on this? I'm in the US and have 1 Gbps symmetrical fiber for $70/month. The US is a big country and some people will have it very slow, b
381.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
I simply quoted RFC 8375. It specifically called out that while RFC 7788 mentions ".home" (quoted below), it wasn't reserved, which ".home.arpa" aims to fix. But while you say "home.arpa is for HNCP", I al
382.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
RFC 8375 seems to have approved it specifically to use in Home Networking Control Protocol, though it also states "it is not intended that the use of 'home.arpa.' be restricted solely to networks where HNCP is deployed. Rathe
383.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
Whether the poster was "belittling Dropbox as a product" or "helpfully offering notes" seems like a judgment one can make about the exchange, regardless of poster's intent. I never understood this to be the reason i
384.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
This is why I said it depends [on whether the service needs to identify you.] In some cases, identification is not necessary for authorization.
385.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
I think the parent commenter used "understood" to mean "recognized." That said, I don't really understand the supposed misunderstanding you point out. It seems that dang argues that "the exchange was pleasant a
386.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
The first sentence contains a footnote (1) with links to a bunch of examples.
387.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
I wasn't responding directly to Matrix's use of MAS. More generally I aimed to make the parent poster aware of a new technology that allows for private authentication, which they claimed was impossible. Privacy Pass is currently b
388.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
Yeah, I would argue it's less about removing trust from the client (which will ultimately get an auth token in addition to secrets and plaintext messages) and more about allowing for centralized authentication and authorization policie
389.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
With OIDC, both occur: the client is redirected to the authentication server where they directly authenticate, then carries a token cross-domain back to the service. Finally, the service validates the token against the auth server. The alte
390.
▲
by
radlad
2y ago
It kind of depends. See Kagi Privacy Pass ("Allows you to use Kagi Search with Privacy Pass, which cryptographically ensures that Kagi cannot tie that request to an account and allows for further privacy and anonymity."): https:&
More ›