ra1n85

14 ms·

91.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Your "media" was gagged - completely unable to speak about the arrest, sentencing, and secret imprisoning of one of your fellow citizens.
92.
by ra1n85 8y ago
I don't consider arresting and immediately sentencing an individual to 13 months in prison for broadcasting outside of a public trial to be sensible in the least. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews&#x2F
93.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Didn't they buy Linksys? Don't they make their own line of home routers and modems/set top boxes?
94.
by ra1n85 8y ago
It’s only cheaper if you’re operating at large scale. For the vast majority of organizations, Cisco/Juniper/Palo Alto/Arista are the only cost effective options.
95.
by ra1n85 8y ago
So much this. NDP is a horrible mess.
96.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Somewhat of a good point, but I don't think it applies here - some implementations, particularly inexpensive devices like SOC's, do exact search on common prefix lengths like /64 and /48. I can't imagine this would
97.
by ra1n85 8y ago
>I mean, I have no use for giving every single host a /64, but I've got five or six VLAN's and without at least a /56 I've got no way of actually deploying IPv6 on my network. Why can't you subnet the /
98.
by ra1n85 8y ago
>2^64 link layer connections are probably not present in a competently designed IPv6 network. From the article: "Provides a very simple mechanism for a single host or interface to be able to run 2^64 virtual machines" That equa
99.
by ra1n85 8y ago
I'm speaking from the perspective of the router (or physical host) which must maintain NDP entries.
100.
by ra1n85 8y ago
When I see things like this, I suspect people aren't thinking through all of the NDP edge cases. Do you really want the potential to have 2^64 NDP entries on your gateway? What about NUD - do you really want that many potential hosts
101.
by ra1n85 8y ago
I agree with you, primarily because this was a decision made by the individual himself. Unlike a monkey shot off into space 40 years ago, this guy presumably understood the risk to the endeavor. And it's "losses" :)
102.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Why?
103.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Fascinating. A hard ratio seems fair minded, but seemed to have failed here because I think there was a misunderstanding around compensation. Compensation is a product of many variables including value created for the company and supply&#x
104.
by ra1n85 8y ago
Totally agree. Looking back, often no talent has been better than poor talent (or those that actually decrease group productivity). Huge opportunity cost with bad hires, and even more challenging to move them out to somewhere that they wou
105.
by ra1n85 8y ago
This is an assertion without data to back it up. Care to elaborate?
106.
by ra1n85 9y ago
How do you handle buffering? Any challenges with processing new headers/encapsulation schemes, or is it flexible in that regard? [ Edit: Nevermind, found the data sheet: https://www.netronome.com/media/documents&#
107.
by ra1n85 9y ago
Nothing is wrong with immigrant labor. It's the abuse of immigrant labor that's wrong.
108.
by ra1n85 9y ago
Very much this. Take a long look at the companies providing feedback around your time off being troublesome. Likely, you wouldn't want to work with them.
109.
by ra1n85 9y ago
For 8 years of work, the conclusions don't seem very insightful.
110.
by ra1n85 9y ago
Right - the hardware is already built. PHY, chipset, host CPU/disk/RAM, etc. It really comes down to the whitebox being selected. Facebook does do some hardware design, but it's more of chaining multiple merchant silicon c
111.
by ra1n85 9y ago
It makes (business) sense to build your own gear when you operate at scale. Typical use cases are TORs and small table routers used for data center Clos topologies. Both often make use of merchant silicon which come with SDK's.
112.
by ra1n85 9y ago
No, that only pertains to specific parts of the network (which are typically not complex). Google does operate (lots of) vendor gear, particularly at their network edge.
113.
by ra1n85 9y ago
I understand the motivation to leave a field if the practices are dishonest. I've been there, too. However, did you note whether or not these efforts may have been positive contributions to the healthcare of humans? I would imagine g
114.
by ra1n85 9y ago
Does that really provide a counterweight to his role in Ukraine's recent conflict (which resulted in thousands of deaths)?
115.
by ra1n85 9y ago
>And this has been their defense all along I don't think it's any defense - it's plain fact. You're going to have to interopate with other networks. BGP is the protocol franca for doing so (until another rolls along
116.
by ra1n85 9y ago
>This is why so many of us pray for SDN. It’s the only way to wrest control of networking Why not take the standards approach and draft a protocol spec? At some point, you'll need to interoperate with those horribly dogmatic vendor
117.
by ra1n85 9y ago
>construnction
118.
by ra1n85 9y ago
>Secondly—and relatedly—S-corp owners are getting rich because so much of the revenue being generated by their enterprises is going into their own, rather than their staffs’, pockets. This may be occurring even in the absence of any nefa
119.
by ra1n85 9y ago
My knee jerk reaction here was "ugh, more consolidation of the media by US mega corporations." But then I noted that Fox is owned by News Corp, which owns the Wall Street Journal and New York Post.
120.
by ra1n85 9y ago
Happens all the time. The basic Unix tools are valuable assets - it's more than just ssh.

More ›